ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
|
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 5:16�am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: * *Hello? *This is February 12, 2007. *FACTUAL ERROR!!! * *There's one little problem, "Stefan." *Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" * *in the FCC CORES database. *The best that can be found * *are two Steven Wolfes: * *Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 * *Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. *Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. Tsk, tsk. I've never "boasted" about being an amateur extra. I've always said I don't have an amateur radio license. I've also always said I've had a Commercial Radiotelephone license since 1956 (test taken at an FCC Field Office, one sitting). By the way, I *am* registered with the FCC CORES and have been since July 30, 2000. CORES is NOT exclusively for radio amateurs. Haven't you been able to understand that in SEVEN YEARS? Tsk, tsk, tsk. Must be the terrible sound of all that organ grinding you dance to... Wurst regards old weenie, LA |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 9:48�am, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: * *Hello? *This is February 12, 2007. *FACTUAL ERROR!!! * *There's one little problem, "Stefan." *Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" * *in the FCC CORES database. *The best that can be found * *are two Steven Wolfes: * *Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 * *Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. *Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave Mark, ignore that old weenie. "Out of the box" has always been available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes. The old weenie is just trying some stupid, juvenile emotional- baggage "come back" because that's all he has left in his repertoire of "replies." He's tried the same macho-middle- school baggage thing with "years of interest and no ham license." :-) I've kept saying that my advocacy has always been to eliminate the morse code test from FCC licensing regs. The FCC has finally, legally AGREED. Now all the morsemen are "unhappy" and are trying to take out their frustrations on those they think are "lesser" individuals. Boo hoo for them. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 13, 9:48?am, wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Hello? This is February 12, 2007. FACTUAL ERROR!!! There's one little problem, "Stefan." Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" in the FCC CORES database. The best that can be found are two Steven Wolfes: Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave Mark, ignore that old weenie. "Out of the box" has always been available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes. The old weenie is just trying some stupid, juvenile emotional- baggage "come back" because that's all he has left in his repertoire of "replies." He's tried the same macho-middle- school baggage thing with "years of interest and no ham license." :-) I've kept saying that my advocacy has always been to eliminate the morse code test from FCC licensing regs. The FCC has finally, legally AGREED. Now all the morsemen are "unhappy" and are trying to take out their frustrations on those they think are "lesser" individuals. Boo hoo for them. It seems that kb9rqz gives you the opportunity to post from the spring board of absurdity so you can dive into the darkest reaches of ham radio existentialism. I do enjoy your posts and consider them negative feedback of our worst characteristics. That is, you are a the negative feedback loop of hign gain op amp that stabilizes kb9rqz's wild oscillations. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 3:56�pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 13, 9:48?am, wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: *Hello? This is February 12, 2007. FACTUAL ERROR!!! *There's one little problem, "Stefan." Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" *in the FCC CORES database. The best that can be found *are two Steven Wolfes: *Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 *Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave * *Mark, ignore that old weenie. *"Out of the box" has always been * *available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have * *to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes. * *The old weenie is just trying some stupid, juvenile emotional- * *baggage "come back" because that's all he has left in his * *repertoire of "replies." *He's tried the same macho-middle- * *school baggage thing with "years of interest and no ham * *license." *:-) * *I've kept saying that my advocacy has always been to * *eliminate the morse code test from FCC licensing regs. * *The FCC has finally, legally AGREED. *Now all the morsemen * *are "unhappy" and are trying to take out their frustrations on * *those they think are "lesser" individuals. *Boo hoo for them. It seems that kb9rqz gives you the opportunity to post from the spring board of absurdity so you can dive into the darkest reaches of ham radio existentialism. Nope, Mark isn't "my springboard." EVERYONE is a springboard and it ain't any "existentialism." Now, quit misdirecting and explain WHY you are claiming all this "ham radio experience" and there isn't any record of a "Stefan Wolfe" at the FCC. Are you a ham in Canada? In Mexico? Where? I do enjoy your posts and consider them negative feedback of our worst characteristics. That is, you are a the negative feedback loop of *hign gain op amp that stabilizes kb9rqz's wild oscillations. "Stefan," the only "wild oscillation" is YOURS about Mark. You seem to have a wild hair itching on him. Not my problem. It's yours. LA |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 6:16�pm, wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:56:33 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... On Feb 13, 9:48?am, wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: *Hello? This is February 12, 2007. FACTUAL ERROR!!! *There's one little problem, "Stefan." Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" *in the FCC CORES database. The best that can be found *are two Steven Wolfes: *Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 *Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave funny mr wole but you violate USENET convention and flasely claims lens words as your own * Mark, ignore that old weenie. *"Out of the box" has always been * available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have * to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes. Mark, I noticed it right away but hoped this Wolfe in anonymouse clothing would set it right. He didn't. He couldn't...he doesn't exist in this time-space continuum. Color him is lovely violation. LA |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 13, 3:56?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message It seems that kb9rqz gives you the opportunity to post from the spring board of absurdity so you can dive into the darkest reaches of ham radio existentialism. Nope, Mark isn't "my springboard." EVERYONE is a springboard and it ain't any "existentialism." Oh yes he is. You often use his posts as an excuse to launch "negative feedback". And your posts almost universally question the purpose the the existence of amateur radio's existence. That is the fundamental basis of existentialism. Now, quit misdirecting and explain WHY you are claiming all this "ham radio experience" and there isn't any record of a "Stefan Wolfe" at the FCC. Are you a ham in Canada? In Mexico? Where? My FCC amateur status is not relevant on any usenet newsgroup; however, since you ask, I happen to be a 13wpm extra. I do not care to prove it. I do not care what you believe about my FCC status since no license is required to post here in any case. I do enjoy your posts and consider them negative feedback of our worst characteristics. That is, you are a the negative feedback loop of hign gain op amp that stabilizes kb9rqz's wild oscillations. "Stefan," the only "wild oscillation" is YOURS about Mark. You seem to have a wild hair itching on him. Not my problem. It's yours. I am not sure exactly what a wild hair itching is. It is not a complete metaphor. Frequently you seem to use metaphors that have a good sound but really make no sense. If I were to to say "len has a wild air itching on amateurs who support code", that would seem to imply, but only indirectly, that you have a psychological aversion of those who have a talent that your cannot duplicate and never will. For all I know, the root cause may have more to do with, say, your wife, than with amateur radio. It is simply a wild hair itching. Now, if I were to say "morse code is the wild hair that grows inside len's ear which he fears to cut because he knows it will never go away but will come back with a vengeance"...That is a complete metaphor. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message ... and my problem since he likes to stalk me which is ok with Morsemen like Mike D but then their morsehood gives em specail rights in their own mind You started by attacking me because I said something favorable about code a few eeks ago. You are the hit and run stalker. Stop undermining my posts and I will leave you alone. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
"Stefan Wolfe" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... and my problem since he likes to stalk me which is ok with Morsemen like Mike D but then their morsehood gives em specail rights in their own mind You started by attacking me because I said something favorable about code a few eeks ago. You are the hit and run stalker. Stop undermining my posts and I will leave you alone. I. a Mrseman?? Marcus, you trained chimp you, how wrong you could be about some much and now we can include this. But then again the circular logic of Bry and his trained monkey ( a trained monkey having a trained monkey???) since I fail to speak out ion defense of Marcus, I must be against him.I stay silent because in the cosmic scheme, he and Bry and the old you from the left coats are insignificant. They are fun toys to fool with, like watching a cat chase a piece of string. twitch the string and the react..loads of fun to a point..and then as with all tiresome things, they become objects to be ignored and discarded I'd say Marcus the trained chimp, being prickish BUT (1) he might take it as a compliment or possible as an invitation to join him and his"wife" in some perverse act or (2) Brian Burke of Pickerington, Ohio, callsign N0IMD might see this a yet another threat in some endless chain of perceived threats and file yet another report in an endless procession of reports Mark -- you are the "man" Totally inferior in your existence, but "the man" none the less, or even more is less Dean |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message ... You are the hit and run stalker. I am no stalker at all I have not threatened you with harm of any sort Stop undermining my posts and I will leave you alone. but that statement techincaly was a crime: extortion but of course LE does not realy care about that so you are likely fine, and wise to hide your ID So we have an understanding. Thank you. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:32:50 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: So we have an understanding. Thank you. yes we know you are a criminal as well as a coward Clean your yard. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
|
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 9:41�pm, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Feb 13, 5:16?am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: ? ?Hello? ?This is February 12, 2007. ?FACTUAL ERROR!!! ? ?There's one little problem, "Stefan." ?Isn't ANY "Stefan Wolfe" ? ?in the FCC CORES database. ?The best that can be found ? ?are two Steven Wolfes: ? ?Steven H. Wolfe, KC4UZW, Tech, FRN 0004408340 ? ?Steven B. Wolfe, KC9KTN, Tech, FRN 0016067183 You have something in common. ?Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. * *Tsk, tsk. *I've never "boasted" about being an amateur extra. How could you? *You aren't an Amateur Extra. What an absolutely BRILLIANT deduction! You must have an IQ of at least 73, yes? * *I've always said I don't have an amateur radio license. * That's probably a good idea, since it happens to be true. How do you KNOW that? Have you looked through all the old callbooks? :-) Did I mention anything about CORES being exclusively for radio amateurs, Len? Is your name 'Stefan Wolfe?' :-) * *Haven't you been able to understand that in SEVEN YEARS? You didn't tell me anything new, Len. *There has been no "Extra right out of the box" for you despite your bragging of SEVEN YEARS ago. "Bragging?!?" :-) Oh, my, you really want to persist in your little emotional- baggage game, don't you? :-) Tsk, all you are doing is taking up message storage space with that, senior. Waste of Google resources. * *Tsk, tsk, tsk. *Must be the terrible sound of all that organ * *grinding you dance to... I don't hear organ music and I don't feel like dancing, Len. That must be why your romance with Cranky Spanky is coming to an end. Well, it's better to have loved once than not at all. Still paying alimony to the first wife? You're still just a sidewalk superintendent. Nope. Don't work for the city or the utilities here. I've only been in the BIGGER world of radio of OTHER civil radio services for half a century. You ever use an aircraft radio while at the controls on your own time? You ever use a maritime radio on board while it was afloat...on your own time? Poor baby. All I've been advocating in here was the END of the code test. And it WILL happen! Sunnuvagun! No "bragging" there. The FCC announced it. And here you are with jackboots dancing on the cobblestones looking to start Krystallnacht II. Poor guy, must be frustrating as hell for you to have to take so much. I feel your pain. LA |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
|
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message ps.com... On Feb 13, 6:16?pm, wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:56:33 -0500, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: Mark, I noticed it right away but hoped this Wolfe in anonymouse clothing would set it right. He didn't. He couldn't...he doesn't exist in this time-space continuum. Color him is lovely violation. As long as I can send bits of information to the news servers, I exist. Cognito Ergo Sum. |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
wrote in message ... he does exist he is just fying false colours making him a pirate in naval terms and showing these Morsemen as priates amsues me Heh heh, I love the term "Morsemen", as if to confer special honors to those whose very existence so tortures you. You two probably don't remember this but there was a little jingle that we had way back when ARRL was discussing the no-code tech license: "No-code, no-code, rah rah rah. dididit didididit ditdit dah" Not knowing the language, you likely cannot understand the second line. :-)) |
ARRL Now Only Wants No Code Hams - Holding Midnight Exams
On Feb 13, 12:04�pm, "
wrote: On Feb 13, 9:48?am, wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:16:01 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: You have something in common. ?Despite your boast of seven years ago, there is no one listed by the name of Leonard H. Anderson with an Amateur Extra. but no extra out of the box is avalable yet Dave * *Mark, ignore that old weenie. *"Out of the box" has always been * *available when the FCC set regulations so that one did NOT have * *to wear radio training pants as a novice or "lesser" classes. * *The old weenie is just trying some stupid, juvenile emotional- * *baggage "come back" because that's all he has left in his * *repertoire of "replies." *He's tried the same macho-middle- * *school baggage thing with "years of interest and no ham * *license." You mean "stupid, juvenile emotional baggage "come back" like the one YOU just used, YTour Putziness? There was nothing emotional or non-factual stated. YOU stated that you were going to get your "extra lite right out of the box". The FACTS are that you lied. You let the box lay around, get moldy, and then complained about the roaches it was attracting. * *I've kept saying that my advocacy has always been to * *eliminate the morse code test from FCC licensing regs. * *The FCC has finally, legally AGREED. *Now all the morsemen * *are "unhappy" and are trying to take out their frustrations on * *those they think are "lesser" individuals. *Boo hoo for them. You mean that folks kept whining until they finally caved in and gutted the service. And I am not speaking solely about the Code test, Your Sliminess. You waited it out for a total of three different code test AND two writtens. Pretty lame, Mr 14-Years-Of-Night-School-To-Be-An-Engineer. Pretty lame. Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com