![]() |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
Paul is throwing a private party at RRAM. Too bad nobody is showing up.
|
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 23, 10:01 pm, "Len Slanderson" flatusr@socal wrote:
Paul is throwing a private party at RRAM. Too bad nobody is showing up. N2EY's unsupervised numbers are there. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will
far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. You do realize that there is a difference between "whining about" and "laughing at" don't you? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
You do realize that there is a difference between "whining about" and "laughing at" don't you? Sure. "laughing at" is what those excluded claim they are doing. "whining about" is what those who are excluded are actually doing. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:08:17 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: You do realize that there is a difference between "whining about" and "laughing at" don't you? Sure. "laughing at" is what those excluded claim they are doing. "whining about" is what those who are excluded are actually doing. Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? Odd, that's not how it was promoted to the big 8 when it was approved. Why wasn't it promoted as an exclusive newsgroup from the beginning? No skin off my nose. Can one really be excluded from a neighborhood that one wouldn't have gone to anyway? Have a good day. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? I'm not sure who "you guys" are. However, that said... Based on the behaviour of people in this newsgroup, it is safe to conclude that if these same people posted the same messages to RRAModerated, those postings would be excluded. Odd, that's not how it was promoted to the big 8 when it was approved. Why wasn't it promoted as an exclusive newsgroup from the beginning? I believe the newsgroup's charter was outlined very well, and to date I have no reason to believe that Paul or any of the other moderators have violated that charter. If you feel they have, why not bring it to the attention of the B8MB? No skin off my nose. Can one really be excluded from a neighborhood that one wouldn't have gone to anyway? Then why are you whining? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote:
I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:30:43 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? I'm not sure who "you guys" are. However, that said... You typed it, you snipped it, and now you say you don't remember it? Sorry, couldn't get past the first lie. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 23, 10:01 pm, "Len Slanderson" flatusr@socal wrote:
Paul is throwing a private party at RRAM. Too bad nobody is showing up. TRUE!! Moderated Usenet newsgroups are just about as exciting as listening in on your average 75M NTS Traffic Net with the same tired senile old farts passing on "Happy Birthday" NTS messages for the same cheap-assed old joos who send them to each other year-after-year because their too goddammed cheap to buy 2-for-$1 birthday cards at the local Dollar General Store. Thank glub however we have freqs like 14.275 with that kooky Kanadian Karl and his suck-boys who play all day long and provide us with alternative radio-fun when the usual stuff in RRAP slows down at times. Hey...I hear that Pauls'Party is "clothing optional" and all the invites are allowed into his hot tub!! OMG can you imagine that??? All those OBESE FAT CHEAP HAMS sitting NAKED in the hot tub and talking about how ham radio used to be??? Jeezus H Fricken XMAS I'd bet you the hot tub water looked like EGG DROP SOUP after those dirty old men got out! Prolly the first BATH they've all had in a long time! PFHBLTTTTTTTT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ps: Don't forget to drop by www.nimbusters.com and say hello to Lloyd in Alabama and his gay-boys who have an ongoing 24/7 CIRCLE JERK on the message boards. Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ! ! ! |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 3:08 pm, Bob Brock wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 09:30:43 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote: Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? I'm not sure who "you guys" are. However, that said... You typed it, you snipped it, and now you say you don't remember it? Sorry, couldn't get past the first lie. Then there will be no more need to respond to MD. You'll just get more of the same. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
|
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? I'm not sure who "you guys" are. However, that said... You typed it, you snipped it, and now you say you don't remember it? Nope, never said that. "you guys" is plural. I'm one guy. Hence "I'm not sure who 'you guys' are." Can you tell me who the "other" guys are that are "claiming the moderated ng is excluding people already"? I just want to make sure who the others are I'm alledgedly speaking for. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:39:53 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote: Are you guys now claiming that the moderated ng is excluding people already? I'm not sure who "you guys" are. However, that said... You typed it, you snipped it, and now you say you don't remember it? Nope, never said that. "you guys" is plural. I'm one guy. Hence "I'm not sure who 'you guys' are." Can you tell me who the "other" guys are that are "claiming the moderated ng is excluding people already"? I just want to make sure who the others are I'm alledgedly speaking for. When you answer the question for your part in it, I'll consider it. Until then.... |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote: I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
When you answer the question for your part in it, I'll consider it. Until then.... Just like I thought... you can't. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.) |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Bob Brock" wrote: When you answer the question for your part in it, I'll consider it. Until then.... Just like I thought... you can't. That wasn't an answer. Try again. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 7:53 pm, "Bob Brock" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote: I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? But he's here "talking" about it. Or is he whining? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.) Cox's what? Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:00:03 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.) Have fun if when you get it. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
|
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
|
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
wrote:
Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. I have no interest in using Google to post messages to USENET. When Cox gets around to adding the group to their servers, and there's a topic I wish to comment on, I will. I suspect I'll see more of my own postings in that forum that I will of yours. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 8:25 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. I have no interest in using Google to post messages to USENET. When Cox gets around to adding the group to their servers, and there's a topic I wish to comment on, I will. You'll try. I suspect I'll see more of my own postings in that forum that I will of yours. Enjoy reading yourself. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote in message .. . wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote: I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? So also are a whole bunch of us. And your point is? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:12:25 -0500, "Len Slanderson" flatusr@socal
wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote: I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? So also are a whole bunch of us. And your point is? Do you have a real name and not one that you slandersoned off someone else? Qute really, but worthy of filtering. Get real and I'll treat you that way. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
Bob Brock wrote in
: On 24 Feb 2007 17:17:29 -0800, wrote: On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote: KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.) Cox's what? Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. You volunteering to elmer him? ;-) Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You are participating in rram, you're just doing it in a different group. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote in message ... On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:12:25 -0500, "Len Slanderson" flatusr@socal wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote in message . .. wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 24, 8:45 am, "KH6HZ" wrote: I predict the number of posts in this group whining about RRAModerated will far exceed the number of posts in the group itself. KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? So also are a whole bunch of us. And your point is? Do you have a real name and not one that you slandersoned off someone else? Qute really, but worthy of filtering. Get real and I'll treat you that way. How big-headed and generous of you. To be honest? I couldn't care less how you treat me. You don't count. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
Mike Coslo wrote:
... Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You are participating in rram, you're just doing it in a different group. - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - I think that is the proper way to do it. The catholics make fun of the mormons, and we do so OUTSIDE their church ... I don't know for certain, but I would suspect they do the exact opposite--and obviously, outside the catholic church. JS |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You noticed that too, huh? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Mike Coslo" wrote: Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You noticed that too, huh? Ho Hum. Paul's new moderated group will most likely end up being relegated to the Has Been file within a few short weeks, if that. Once the Upitty-Up Hams tire of being censored by Paul, they will return to this wild and wooly newsgroup. A little bit of Paul goes a looooong way. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Len Slanderson" flatusr@socal wrote in message ... Paul is throwing a private party at RRAM. Too bad nobody is showing up. Indeed I monarate my blog blog that is is deferant tahn newsgropes I is in charge of taht indeed tehy wanted me teo leed man intwo batle as an member of teh chemcal cops indeed they won let me retire indeed http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 25, 5:50 am, "Dudley" anon@anon wrote:
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... "Mike Coslo" wrote: Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. You noticed that too, huh? Ho Hum. Yep, neither Cosmo nor Deignan are on RRAMod, but they're here talking about it. Paul's new moderated group will most likely end up being relegated to the Has Been file within a few short weeks, if that. I think Jim's unsupervised numbers will be a fixture here and there. Once the Upitty-Up Hams tire of being censored by Paul, they will return to this wild and wooly newsgroup. They'll still post here anonymously. They need a reason to live. A little bit of Paul goes a looooong way. I appreciate what Paul has done. For example, he helped us recapture some old Air Force AR Club calls and keep them in Air Force their respective communities. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:34:42 -0600, Mike Coslo
wrote: Bob Brock wrote in : On 24 Feb 2007 17:17:29 -0800, wrote: On Feb 24, 8:00 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Bob Brock" wrote: KH6HZ is absent from RRAMod. That is odd isn't it? Why would it be odd? I haven't submitted a posting to it yet (as of 8pm, Cox's news servers don't have it.) Cox's what? Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. You volunteering to elmer him? ;-) Gawlee, Bob. For someone who doesnt want to have anything to do with rram, it sure consumes a lot of your posts. I was just trying to figure out what people K6HZ was saying were being excluded from RRAM. Now I find out that he is one of them. You are participating in rram, you're just doing it in a different group. Laughing at is not equivalent to participating in. Sorry, I couldn't help myself. This post made the number of replies to this thread equal to the total number of posts to RRAM since inception. I notice that this group has settled down nicely now that they have a home base. I like it. I will however be happier when those who feel excluded have access to the group. Then their excuse for whining will be gone. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
"Bob Brock" wrote:
I was just trying to figure out what people K6HZ was saying were being excluded from RRAM. Now I find out that he is one of them. Who is K6HZ? |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:59:51 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"Bob Brock" wrote: I was just trying to figure out what people K6HZ was saying were being excluded from RRAM. Now I find out that he is one of them. Who is K6HZ? A typo. You aren't the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree are you. I guess you just like to argue. I'll put you with Slanderson for 60 days or so. It's for your own good. |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
|
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 24, 7:17 pm, wrote:
Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. Not yet. Google has yet to allow posting although they are allowing folks to read it. It may take a few weeks for the NG to be picked up by the majority of news servers. Not that you cannot post from Google.. You just have to go direct to the submission address with an E-mail which is a lot more trouble. -= Bob =- |
Paul Schleck Is Giving A Party at RRAM
On Feb 26, 6:51 am, "KC4UAI" wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:17 pm, wrote: Lame excuse. Anyone can post via Google. Not yet. Google has yet to allow posting although they are allowing folks to read it. Hey, Just tested this again and found that they are now accepting postings. So, I correct myself.. :) -= bob =- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com