![]() |
|
CW minimizes the carbon footprint of you station
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming
will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) |
CW minimizes the carbon footprint of you station
Stefan Wolfe wrote:
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) Stefan: That post is so full of "hot air" it'd run a rig for a month off the methane! ROFLOL! Regards, JS |
CW minimizes the carbon footprint of you station
On Feb 28, 12:26 am, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
That says it all. CW is green. Hams interested in reducing global warming will convert to QRP which operates much better under CW. Sure, I have no problem with those AM 1.5KW power hogs as long as they can spend the money but even affluent Hams with a conscience will convert to CW QRP to reduce energy. All hams should be given a carbon ration. Then, those who use tiny amounts of it on 5W CW QRP can sell their extra credits to allow the new and old uncoded 20m phone SSB blasters to continue their wasteful ways. Ham carbon credits could be traded and sold as a commodity at the ARRL site as a service. Solar, biodesil, ethanol, human powered generators and other carbon neutral energy sources would not need to accout for carbon ration questions. FCC would define an equitable ration for each ham. This might also inspire the creation of new off grid station power sources which would have several logistical advantages. How do you like my idea? :-) When I hear Algore communicating with CW, I'll give it a second look. It just didn't impress me the first time around. |
CW minimizes the carbon footprint of you station
wrote:
When I hear Algore communicating with CW, I'll give it a second look. It just didn't impress me the first time around. Algore's too busy inventing the Internet and paying his $3000/mo electric bill for his 10k/sqft house. |
leave the NG by your own standard
|
CW minimizes the carbon footprint of you station
|
More Pathological Lying By Mork Moron, KB9RQZ
|
More Pathological Lying By Morkie Moron, KB9RQZ
On Mar 1, 3:26?pm, wrote:
On 1 Mar 2007 11:36:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:03?pm, wrote: just another stlaking thread Another WHAT thread, collegeboy? And why the dodge of my questions in the previous post in this thread, ya COWARD..?!?! QUOTE: What abusing of the new NG, fatboy? I don't see you there. Lennie's crossed over, but he only made two posts before starting in on his own ad homien attacks. We'll see ho long it takes him to really dig in...I don't give him a week. he can't help himself. Now..to address my previous comments in this thread...What's the REAL excuse keeping you from erecting an HF antenna when you had already claimed to have one? UNQUOTE You gonna avoid answering these questions, too? Steve, K4YZ |
More Pathological Lying By Morkie Moron, KB9RQZ
On Mar 1, 3:44�pm, "K4YZ" wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:26?pm, wrote: On 1 Mar 2007 11:36:55 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: On Feb 28, 3:03?pm, wrote: just another stlaking thread * * Another WHAT thread, collegeboy? * * And why the dodge of my questions in the previous post in this thread, ya COWARD..?!?! QUOTE: * * *What abusing of the new NG, fatboy? * * I don't see you there. * * Lennie's crossed over, but he only made two posts before starting in on his own ad homien attacks. *We'll see ho long it takes him to really dig in...I don't give him a week. *he can't help himself. * * Now..to address my previous comments in this thread...What's the REAL excuse keeping you from erecting an HF antenna when you had already claimed to have one? UNQUOTE * * You gonna avoid answering these questions, too? Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com