|
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
On Sep 29, 4:15 pm, an_old_friend wrote:
On Sep 29, 3:11 pm, wrote: On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 27, 8:53 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Leo" wrote: That's just weird. It is silly, really. Anyone with any net.knowledge can have an unlimited number of names, IP addresses, etc. There's really no way to "ban" someone. I could still be posting there today, if I really wanted to. insteresting observartion MD you are right of course OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Ayup! And the others, too. They couldn't stand it when I decided to quit getting all the spam in my regualr email box. indeed I use much the same theory alough what migth realy fix the problem kis robomoderations reqiure somesort of auntentacation of the sender nothing more that would stop all the problem children but robeson Robesin thought that even though I said the same things in the same way and in the same language that I was somehow trying to "trick" him with my new throwaway email addy. What a moron. Welp, I just checked hot-ham's email box and there are hundreds of: "PAYPAL" phishing expeditions, I just won the Australian Lottery, the British Lottery, Russian girls that want to meet me, Viagara, Longer weenie medicine, and untold spam that I have no interest in seeing. Hmmmm? I wonder if Larry tRolls old Russian girlfriend is trying to reach me? Or did he marry her? Maybe he married her and she's still trying to reach me? Then we had BlackTower and Quitefine, posing as Mike and Jim. Good Grief!!! but Procoder have specail prevledges and as MD said the "ban in Mod is easy to get around. They have no need for a "work-around." They are probably posting sticky sweet garbage that passes through with flying colors. |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:30:26 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote: insteresting observartion MD you are right of course Naturally. All my postings are 100% factually accurate. no the are only rarely so OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Not quite sure what this means. I stated something is technically feasible. I didn't state I supported one way or the other if someone did or didn't do it. not oday you did't but i made no time reference you have ritzed me for using that flexibilty "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:34:49 -0700, wrote: On Sep 29, 4:15 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 29, 3:11 pm, wrote: On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 27, 8:53 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Leo" wrote: That's just weird. It is silly, really. Anyone with any net.knowledge can have an unlimited number of names, IP addresses, etc. There's really no way to "ban" someone. I could still be posting there today, if I really wanted to. insteresting observartion MD you are right of course OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Ayup! And the others, too. They couldn't stand it when I decided to quit getting all the spam in my regualr email box. indeed I use much the same theory alough what migth realy fix the problem kis robomoderations reqiure somesort of auntentacation of the sender nothing more that would stop all the problem children but robeson Robesin thought that even though I said the same things in the same way and in the same language that I was somehow trying to "trick" him with my new throwaway email addy. What a moron. yes he certanly was nd likely still is a moron but not a victum like me Welp, I just checked hot-ham's email box and there are hundreds of: "PAYPAL" phishing expeditions, I just won the Australian Lottery, the British Lottery, Russian girls that want to meet me, Viagara, Longer weenie medicine, and untold spam that I have no interest in seeing. well in joy reding the nigrain bank fraud myself but i cant wriet abut it Hmmmm? I wonder if Larry tRolls old Russian girlfriend is trying to reach me? Or did he marry her? Maybe he married her and she's still trying to reach me? Then we had BlackTower and Quitefine, posing as Mike and Jim. Good Grief!!! but Procoder have specail prevledges becuase they work harder for there licensses and as MD said the "ban in Mod is easy to get around. They have no need for a "work-around." They are probably posting sticky sweet garbage that passes through with flying colors. well if i coose one of lessor addresses they will even pass my poss i did that today to counter some really advice being given on the rules "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:30:26 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote: insteresting observartion MD you are right of course Naturally. All my postings are 100% factually accurate. no the are only rarely so and donnt meet my approval OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Not quite sure what this means. I stated something is technically feasible. I didn't state I supported one way or the other if someone did or didn't do it. not oday you did't but i made no time reference you have ritzed me for using that flexibilty simply ofer my refual to use spell chceck porgram "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
On Sep 29, 3:34 pm, wrote:
On Sep 29, 4:15 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 29, 3:11 pm, wrote: On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 27, 8:53 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Leo" wrote: That's just weird. It is silly, really. Anyone with any net.knowledge can have an unlimited number of names, IP addresses, etc. There's really no way to "ban" someone. I could still be posting there today, if I really wanted to. insteresting observartion MD you are right of course OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Ayup! And the others, too. They couldn't stand it when I decided to quit getting all the spam in my regualr email box. indeed I use much the same theory alough what migth realy fix the problem kis robomoderations reqiure somesort of auntentacation of the sender nothing more that would stop all the problem children but robeson Robesin thought that even though I said the same things in the same way and in the same language that I was somehow trying to "trick" him with my new throwaway email addy. What a moron. are you sure robeson was in fact thinking? |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Sep 29, 3:34 pm, wrote: On Sep 29, 4:15 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 29, 3:11 pm, wrote: On Sep 29, 12:05 pm, an_old_friend wrote: On Sep 27, 8:53 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Leo" wrote: That's just weird. It is silly, really. Anyone with any net.knowledge can have an unlimited number of names, IP addresses, etc. There's really no way to "ban" someone. I could still be posting there today, if I really wanted to. insteresting observartion MD you are right of course OTOH you object if somebody uses that fact if you don't likeem Ayup! And the others, too. They couldn't stand it when I decided to quit getting all the spam in my regualr email box. indeed I use much the same theory alough what migth realy fix the problem kis robomoderations reqiure somesort of auntentacation of the sender nothing more that would stop all the problem children but robeson Robesin thought that even though I said the same things in the same way and in the same language that I was somehow trying to "trick" him with my new throwaway email addy. What a moron. indeed thus i not cpaable of spell inglike you do becuase of my infrimarty but i agree |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:58:09 -0500, "an_old_friend"
wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message why the fraud ? "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well G -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Moderated newsgroup daily activity
wrote in message ... On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:58:09 -0500, "an_old_friend" wrote: an_old_friend" wrote in message i win woger woger verytime you post you recularous flithy crap I win "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kd8ctl.blogspot.com/ and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com