Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Phil Kane"
writes: On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:53:58 -0400, Scott Unit 69 wrote: How about essay or fill-in-the-blank type questions instead of multiple-guess type questions? This presumes that the examiners are at the professional level and can properly grade an essay-type question. No sweat for me and I'm sure for several others here. I have a PE in several states and have taught electronics at the University level. What about all the other VEs out there? I have BSEE and MSEE from University of Pa. and Drexel, respectively. Also can do 40 wpm Morse and build my own ham rigs. (It ain't braggin' if ya really done it...) The big problem with essay and fill-in-the-blank questions is that the answers are not 100% objective. There's always a measure of judgement involved. For example, take a simple question like "what is the length of a half-wave dipole cut for 7.1 MHz?" With multiple choice, the QPC says that one answer (say, 66 feet) is the correct one and all others are incorrect. But with essays and fill-in-the-blank, what tolerance do we put on the correct answer? Is 67 feet acceptable? 68 feet? 66 feet 3 inches? The person being tested could write a long dissertation on tapering elements, the effect of ground, wire/tubing sizes, etc., and come up with a whole raneg of arguably-correct answers. And that's just a simple question. When you start getting into explanations and diagrams, it gets really hairy. From what I have researched, FCC went to multiple-choice questions for all ham exams no later than 1961. At least 42 years ago, probably more. Try convincing them that they've been wrong all this time. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|