LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old July 25th 03, 11:18 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Keith" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:05:43 -0700, "Elmer E Ing" Elmer E
wrote:

Better read URL:
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/07/22/1/?nc=1


Too bad the ARRL has put itself in such a bad situation. As soon as morse

code
is removed from HF operating requirements those that are mad about the

ARRL not
stopping code removal will quit. All those no code techs and new hams that

come
into the hobby will never join a organization that did everything it could

to
keep the average citizen out of the HF bands. The ARRL has kept ham radio

in
the dark ages by requiring horse and buggy morse code technology.
--
The Radio Page Ham, Police Scanner, Shortwave and more.
http://www.kilowatt-radio.org/


I was not aware that the ARRL was responsible for keeping the code
requirement. All this time I thought it was the FCC. Dang....thanks for
the correction Keith.

Dan/W4NTI


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017