Brian wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Thanks for the link to your proposal, Carl.


A question though. I notice that the proposal to drop element one is
there, but why doesn't the proposal rename the other elements so that
they are in sequence?

I've been around enough of these sort of documents to know that sooner
or later it will have to be changed.

- Mike KB3EIA -


I dunno, Mike. Were you around during the last restructuring?

nope.

The
NPRM was the most amateurish piece of literature I've ever seen from a
government agency. The R/O was the second most. Left more questions
than answers. Of course, there was a lot of interference from the
ARRL in the process, so...

Hmm, too bad. Hard to imagine having an element 2, 3, and 4, but no
element 1. It would make good joke material, or maybe the start of a
legend. "The ghost of Element 1" 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -