LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 03, 06:22 AM
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Dick Carroll; wrote:
"D. Stussy" wrote:
Apparently, you've never been to Southern California. There were times where
one could count the violations on our "animal farm" repeater - and sometimes
the number of violations per minute would exceed the number of seconds in a
minute. Most of those misfits are still licensed. Watch out HF - here they
come!


Yep, just as they came to VHF/UHF ham radio from the never-never
land of 27 mhz via a no-code (and virtualy no-test) ham radio license.
Seems like the FCC just doesn't care, or they'd never allow it.


There's one and ONLY one reason why the So CA amateur community allows it - it
keeps them off the rest of the repeaters! :-)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition Steve Robeson, K4CAP Policy 1 July 6th 03 08:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017