LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 4th 03, 05:00 AM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes:


In article ,
(Brian) writes:

And we've already heard from the Extra's how if they don't get their
way they are going to destroy the amateur radio service. Dick, Larry,
Dan, Bruce...



Wait a minute ... don't tar all of us Extras with the same brush that
Dick, Larry, et al deserve ...

For example the vast majority of the Directors of NCI are Extras (or
their national equivalent thereof).

Additionally, there are a significant number of Extras amongst our
membership ... at least in proportion to the % of Extras to other
license classes.

So, it's not "the Extras" ... it's the PCTAs ...

Please don't lump all Extras in with that crowd ... it just 'aint so.

Carl - wk3c


Carl:

Brian made the statement that "Extras" such as Dick, Dan, Bruce, and
myself wish to "destroy the amateur radio service." Obviously, he thinks
we want to do this because we *are* PCTA's, and see the value of retaining
code testing (what's left of it) in the ARS. In other words, because we
don't agree with him and the NCTA's, we want to "destroy" the ARS.


No, no, no, no, no. It has nothing to do with your disagreements with
me.

Larry, right after you told that guy not to let the door hit him in
the ass on his way out of the ARS, you said that the FCC ought to take
all the VHF and up amateur bands and sell them to the highest bidder.
Or was that after you said who was your favorite black on the bus? Or
was it after you said something about the knuckle dragging 4-lander
with the southern accent? Maybe it was after you talked about the
welfare mother of color with her hand out?

In any case, you wanted to destroy the ARS for the no-code
Technicians, and it had nothing to do with me.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox Policy 87 August 19th 03 12:41 PM
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox General 1 July 31st 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Phil Kane Policy 0 July 31st 03 03:30 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017