Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ARRL doesn't need to file a petition on the Morse issue, unless, of course, they wise up and decide to ask the FCC to eliminate Morse testing ASAP so they won't continue to alienate a portion of the US amateur population that's larger than their current total membership :-) (They don't need to file a petition to keep code testing, because that is the status quo ...) Well would there be much of a point in submitting a petition that would be a duplication of those already submitted? I'd just as soon let them focus on BPL.... And of course those wheels turn slowly. We shall see ... 73, |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC explains their licensing petition | Equipment | |||
NCVEC explains their licensing petition | Equipment | |||
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) | Dx |