Good Christ Almighty...
 

People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!

How many YEARS is this going to go on??? Jeeeezzzzussscrrrryst!

Dee D. Flint wrote:
"Signal In The Noise" wrote in message
news:Z%42b.15074$S_.4430@fed1read01...

Well David -- you can track NG's threads by going to URL:
http://groups.google.com/

Type in the desired callsign or handle

Get your desired information --- as early as Feb 6, 2000

So the answer is at least 3 years !!!

And there were 11,000 Plus posts related to this callsign !!!!!! ---
Exclamation Signs



"David Stinson" wrote in message
...

People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!

How many YEARS is this going to go on??? Jeeeezzzzussscrrrryst!



If she had received this as a normal sequential assignment, it's doubtful
that anyone would say much. It's just very puzzling why anyone would
request the call sign.

But, just as with trading messages with a few noteworthy members of the
group, no purpose is served discussing it any more.

Kim is a nice enough lady AFAIAC, and beyond that I just look at the
situation as a bit of a quirk. Everyone in the newsgroup has one or more.

- Mike KB3EIA -

People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!

How many YEARS is this going to go on??? Jeeeezzzzussscrrrryst!



Untill the Fat Winch changes her Call

If you read a lot of posts, a number of folks have nothing better to do with
their time. :)

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


"David Stinson" wrote in message
...
People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!

How many YEARS is this going to go on??? Jeeeezzzzussscrrrryst!


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/03

WA8ULX wrote:

People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!
Untill (sic) the Fat Winch (sic) changes her Call

You're a rude little fella, aren't you?
I think I'll apply for WD1CK, or move overseas and
get PU5SY, then come on here just to raise your blood pressure.

Some children....good grief......

You're a rude little fella, aren't you?

Damn right

I think I'll apply for WD1CK, or move overseas and
get PU5SY

Go ahead Morron

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
gy.com...

"Signal In The Noise" wrote in message
news:Z%42b.15074$S_.4430@fed1read01...
Well David -- you can track NG's threads by going to URL:
http://groups.google.com/

Type in the desired callsign or handle

Get your desired information --- as early as Feb 6, 2000

So the answer is at least 3 years !!!

And there were 11,000 Plus posts related to this callsign !!!!!! ---
Exclamation Signs



"David Stinson" wrote in message
...
People are STILL raising hell with Kim W5TIT about her callsign?!?!

How many YEARS is this going to go on??? Jeeeezzzzussscrrrryst!



If she had received this as a normal sequential assignment, it's doubtful
that anyone would say much. It's just very puzzling why anyone would
request the call sign.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


The reason I originally got it is quite different than why I keep it.

Kim W5TIT

Dee D. Flint wrote:

If she had received this as a normal sequential assignment, it's doubtful
that anyone would say much. It's just very puzzling why anyone would
request the call sign.


She may be a birdwatcher. Tits are a kind of small bird. If you're
thinking of
something else, well..... ;-)

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

heh heh, David. It's hilarious, ain't it?


Hey, just look at all the free publicity you've gotten from that callsign.
If this keeps up, you'll be famous by the time Larry is finished pointing
out your callsign to everyone.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

If she had received this as a normal sequential
assignment, it's doubtful that anyone would say
much. It's just very puzzling why anyone would
request the call sign.


I can offer a few ideas why she might request it. Years ago (the 60's),
part of the women's movement involved the idea that breasts were nothing to
be ashamed of - women had them and men had to accept that fact (as many men
from that time may fondly remember, this eventually led to women burning
their bras).

Later, the women's movement urged women to accept their own bodies as
uniquely theirs without placing some type of negative connotation on that.
This had to do with the idea that a woman is no less important simply
because her body is different than a man's.

Still later, all this evolved into the idea that breasts were a sign of
power equal the a man's penis (the phrase "breast power," an alternative to
"women's power," came out of that). This had to do with the psychology
thinking of the time which said many supposedly male things (guns, missiles,
and so on) were actually phallic symbols.

In the end, it may simply be that Kim likes how her callsign sounds.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/