RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   ARRL you can Kiss my $39.00 a Year Good Bye (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/26839-re-arrl-you-can-kiss-my-%2439-00-year-good-bye.html)

Larry Roll K3LT September 3rd 03 12:53 AM

ARRL you can Kiss my $39.00 a Year Good Bye
 
In article k.net,
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:


The ARRL board is in favor of retaining CW on HF.

Dan/W4NTI


Dan:

Does that also mean they favor retaining code testing for a General or
Extra class license? If so, how hard are they going to work to keep the
current code testing requirement in place?

If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would have
come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for
Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing
dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and
becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda.

Supporting "CW" and supporting code testing are two separate and
entirely different things.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Ryan, KC8PMX September 11th 03 05:35 AM

I still am curious why the "middle" code test speed was set at
thirteen...... Why not 12 or 14????


--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...


If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would have
come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for
Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing
dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and
becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda.





Dan/W4NTI September 12th 03 01:40 AM


"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message
...
I still am curious why the "middle" code test speed was set at
thirteen...... Why not 12 or 14????


--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
.. --. .... - . .-. ...


If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would

have
come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for
Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing
dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and
becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda.





Because, for most people, the speed of 13 WPM meant you could ACTUALLY COPY
Morse Code.

For most folks, up to about 12 WPM you could copy it and NOT actually know
it.

Most countries in the world required 12 WPM. The US Military only wanted 10
Groups per minute. Groups meaning 5 letter 'groups' in a 1 minute period.

That help?

Dan/W4NTI



N2EY September 12th 03 02:48 AM

In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes:

I still am curious why the "middle" code test speed was set at
thirteen...... Why not 12 or 14????


FCC decision in 1936.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Ryan, KC8PMX September 15th 03 06:56 AM

Just wanted to know why 13 was some type of magic number.

Thanks,

--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...



Because, for most people, the speed of 13 WPM meant you could ACTUALLY

COPY
Morse Code.

For most folks, up to about 12 WPM you could copy it and NOT actually know
it.

Most countries in the world required 12 WPM. The US Military only wanted

10
Groups per minute. Groups meaning 5 letter 'groups' in a 1 minute period.

That help?

Dan/W4NTI





Len Over 21 September 16th 03 06:09 AM

In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes:

Just wanted to know why 13 was some type of magic number.


Ever stop to think about all the morsemen dooming themselves with
an "unlucky" number? :-)

LHA


PS: Good to hear you survived and all you need are some pain-killers.

Brian September 16th 03 11:59 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes:

Just wanted to know why 13 was some type of magic number.


Ever stop to think about all the morsemen dooming themselves with
an "unlucky" number? :-)

LHA


Great. As if Morse weren't religious enough, you get these guys
started on numerology.

Len Over 21 September 17th 03 02:47 AM

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX"
writes:

Just wanted to know why 13 was some type of magic number.


Ever stop to think about all the morsemen dooming themselves with
an "unlucky" number? :-)

LHA


Great. As if Morse weren't religious enough, you get these guys
started on numerology.


Maybe morsemen could use numerology to "prove something" new
about morse? So far, they only thing they've "proved" is that 'they did it
so everyone else has to, too.' It would be nice to see something new
about their addiction...er, affliction...no, I mean attitude of the ages.

LHA



Dee D. Flint September 17th 03 11:50 PM


"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message
...
Just wanted to know why 13 was some type of magic number.

Thanks,

--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
.. --. .... - . .-. ...


Also there is some evidence that once one has reached the 13wpm level, they
will not forget it even if they don't use. They might grow rusty and become
slow. But it stays in the brain, ready to be called upon. See the book
"The Art and Skill of Radiotelegraphy," which is available for free
downloading from the internet. The author deliberately chose to make this
available to the public for free so that there is no copyright infringement
involved.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



Because, for most people, the speed of 13 WPM meant you could ACTUALLY

COPY
Morse Code.

For most folks, up to about 12 WPM you could copy it and NOT actually

know
it.

Most countries in the world required 12 WPM. The US Military only

wanted
10
Groups per minute. Groups meaning 5 letter 'groups' in a 1 minute

period.

That help?

Dan/W4NTI






Brian Kelly September 20th 03 04:59 AM

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message . com...
"Brian Kelly" wrote in message
m...




. . . I think I lost some of my ability to get it down solid on paper at
speed and I'm working on that.

However I do not agree with a hypothesis that simply cramming for then
passing a 13 or even a 20wpm code test assures a lifetime ability to
copy Morse at any usable speed. I've seen too many examples of "cram &
pass" types who never actually used the stuff on the air to any extent
all but completely forget how to copy Morse. Apparently there is some
combination of both a speed and a number of hours of experience at
that speed which embeds Morse for life.


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


w3rv


It appears to me that the reason 13wpm and higher works, according to the
reference, is that you CAN'T successfully cram to pass the higher speeds.
You've got to have those neural connections solidly in place. However for
10wpm and down you can cram and pass the tests.


I'm not particularly convinced that's the case but there isn't even
any soft evidence which indicates that is or is not the case.

Regardless, there is definitely a point at which a person won't forget even
if they believe they have done so (your experience being a case in point).


Agreed. In spades.

To me, this is the level that Extras should reach, i.e. a level that they
won't forget.


We agree 200% on THAT point!

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


w3rv

Glenn October 17th 03 10:10 PM



Brian Kelly wrote:

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message . com...

"Brian Kelly" wrote in message
. com...




. . . I think I lost some of my ability to get it down solid on paper at
speed and I'm working on that.

However I do not agree with a hypothesis that simply cramming for then
passing a 13 or even a 20wpm code test assures a lifetime ability to
copy Morse at any usable speed. I've seen too many examples of "cram &
pass" types who never actually used the stuff on the air to any extent
all but completely forget how to copy Morse. Apparently there is some
combination of both a speed and a number of hours of experience at
that speed which embeds Morse for life.



Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

w3rv


It appears to me that the reason 13wpm and higher works, according to the
reference, is that you CAN'T successfully cram to pass the higher speeds.
You've got to have those neural connections solidly in place. However for
10wpm and down you can cram and pass the tests.



I'm not particularly convinced that's the case but there isn't even
any soft evidence which indicates that is or is not the case.


Regardless, there is definitely a point at which a person won't forget even
if they believe they have done so (your experience being a case in point).



Agreed. In spades.


To me, this is the level that Extras should reach, i.e. a level that they
won't forget.



We agree 200% on THAT point!


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



w3rv



There's another point to this that I haven't seen anything on yet. It
seems to me that the faster you can copy the easier it gets (to a point,
of course). 13 wpm is a definite PITA to copy, considering they
generally use 10 WPM weight and try to run it together to get the faster
13 wpm. I usually have trouble copying anything slower than 15 wpm, and
I don't like 15, either. Too slow.

Back around 1989 some friends of mine and I were conducting code
practice sessions on one of the local repeaters. We had one young man
who was going for his Advanced (he had passed all the written tests,
including Extra at 12 years old...smart young man!) and tried for the 13
wpm test numerous times, failing every one. My friends and I were
perplexed, since he regularly copied 20 and 25 wpm in our practice
sessions (we threw those speeds in without telling anyone once in a while).

One night before one of his tests, you could tell he was really
discouraged and ready to give up, so I pulled him aside to another
repeater and told him of a technique that a friend of mine told to me. I
told him that, when the test came up, he should take the first test,
which of course was the 20 wpm Extra test. I told him he should not
expect to pass it, but to do his best to copy it and, when the 13 wpm
came up next, it would sound slower and he should pass it with ease. Of
course, he passed the 20 wpm with a perfect copy. He was on the
repeater the following night gloating and bragging. ;-)

Back in the '90s I was driving an 18 wheeler over the road (no, I had my
license WELL before I ever drove trucks). I liked to operate cw while
driving and naturally had to be able to copy code in my head. 20 wpm
and above, the code ceased being letters and formed words. At that time
I was up to around 35-40 wpm, all copied and remembered in my head.

13 wpm has always been a PITA for me to copy, and I think for the reason
I stated above. Everyone talked about the "13 wpm barrier" and it sure
was. I think 15 wpm would have been a much better speed, and easier to
attain, besides. But, as some have said, that's a moot point now. I'm
glad I don't have to take the 5 wpm test. Someone would have to keep
waking me up for the next letter.


--
73 from Glenn - KG5UC


Dan/W4NTI October 17th 03 11:45 PM


"Glenn" wrote in message

Someone would have to keep
waking me up for the next letter.


--
73 from Glenn - KG5UC


Of course you realize that what you just said here will PO the unwashed and
unaware don't ya Glenn?

You will be accused of bragging and being 'superior'.

When those of us that actually can copy QRQ Morse understand you totally.

Dan/W4NTI





Dee D. Flint October 18th 03 12:19 AM


"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message
nk.net...

"Glenn" wrote in message

Someone would have to keep
waking me up for the next letter.


--
73 from Glenn - KG5UC


Of course you realize that what you just said here will PO the unwashed

and
unaware don't ya Glenn?

You will be accused of bragging and being 'superior'.

When those of us that actually can copy QRQ Morse understand you totally.

Dan/W4NTI


Although I passed my 20wpm, I can't do more than 15wpm on a sustained basis.
Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


S. Hanrahan November 5th 03 12:41 PM

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:


Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.


Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.

Stacey/AA7YA


S. Hanrahan November 5th 03 12:44 PM

On 18 Oct 2003 00:05:26 GMT, Dick Carroll
wrote:


That's where listening at considerably faster than you can
copy comes in. You'd be surprised how fast your abilities
improve. W1AW code practice sessions are good.


Yep. Listening to W1AW, if you can copy 7½ WPM or even 10 WPM, 5 WPM
comes easy.

When I tested for my 20 WPM back in 1993, I had code tapes that were
sending 22 WPM code, coupled with actual on-air QSO's and listening to
W1AW, the 20 WPM code test was a breeze.

Stacey/AA7YA

Mike Coslo November 5th 03 02:19 PM

S. Hanrahan wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:



Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.



Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -


Steve Robeson, K4CAP November 5th 03 06:05 PM

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
S. Hanrahan wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:
Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.


Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)


Ahhhhhh! But Mike! To SOME of us it IS music to the ear!

=)

How's your fall looking? It's absolutely spectacular here this year!

73

Steve, K4YZ

Mike Coslo November 5th 03 06:53 PM

Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

S. Hanrahan wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:

Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.

Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)



Ahhhhhh! But Mike! To SOME of us it IS music to the ear!


You know, I'm starting to get frustrated again. I can do nearly 20 wpm
listening to NuMorse with headphones and in a quiet room. But the leaast
bit of background noise, or the conditions on the air, and my speed
drops like a rock. I hope I'm not running up against my personal
limitations.





How's your fall looking? It's absolutely spectacular here this year!



It started out looking like it was going to be pretty blah, with rain
and not much color. But then it did an about face, and got warm and
beautiful. The leaves decided not to listen to the newspaper"leaf color
experts" - whoever they are.


- Mike KB3EIA -


Dan/W4NTI November 5th 03 10:00 PM


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

S. Hanrahan wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:

Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.

Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.

I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)



Ahhhhhh! But Mike! To SOME of us it IS music to the ear!


You know, I'm starting to get frustrated again. I can do nearly 20 wpm
listening to NuMorse with headphones and in a quiet room. But the leaast
bit of background noise, or the conditions on the air, and my speed
drops like a rock. I hope I'm not running up against my personal
limitations.





How's your fall looking? It's absolutely spectacular here this

year!


It started out looking like it was going to be pretty blah, with rain
and not much color. But then it did an about face, and got warm and
beautiful. The leaves decided not to listen to the newspaper"leaf color
experts" - whoever they are.


- Mike KB3EIA -


Now that you KNOW you can actually copy International Morse Code. Throw
out the canned stuff. Fire up the HF rig and use it.

You must teach your brain to 'isolate' and hear ONLY what you are trying to
hear. It takes practice, but it certainly can be done.

Use the most narrow filter at first. Then widden it out. Picking up more
and more interference, and try to pick out the characters.

Its fun.

Dan/W4NTI



Dee D. Flint November 5th 03 11:55 PM


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
S. Hanrahan wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:



Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.



Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -


My OM would practice Morse on the computer at night working to relearn Morse
after I went to bed at night and sure enough, I drifted off to sleep to the
sounds of the code!

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Dee D. Flint November 5th 03 11:58 PM


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

S. Hanrahan wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:19:54 GMT, "Dee D. Flint"
wrote:

Yet 5wpm will even put me to sleep.

Me too. I can copy 45-50 WPM in my head, but I can't write it down
fast enough for a full complete one minute of copy.

I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)



Ahhhhhh! But Mike! To SOME of us it IS music to the ear!


You know, I'm starting to get frustrated again. I can do nearly 20 wpm
listening to NuMorse with headphones and in a quiet room. But the leaast
bit of background noise, or the conditions on the air, and my speed
drops like a rock. I hope I'm not running up against my personal
limitations.



Just keep at it. It probably means you're not quite solid at that speed
yet. Once again you may be expecting too much too soon. FYI, my comfort
zone is 15wpm although I passed the 20. I just don't work it enough to stay
at and be comfortable at 20.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


S. Hanrahan November 6th 03 02:36 AM

On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:19:49 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote:

I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)


I've worked pileups in my sleep the night after Field Day is over. heh
heh ;)

Stacey/AA7YA

Mike Coslo November 6th 03 03:38 AM

S. Hanrahan wrote:
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:19:49 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote:


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)



I've worked pileups in my sleep the night after Field Day is over. heh
heh ;)


I'm guilty if that too!

- Mike KB3EIA -


Ryan, KC8PMX November 6th 03 06:08 AM

Hey Mike!

Believe it or not, that does work for some people. I do know of one person
who took a different letter per night and used a program like NuMorse to
send that letter/character for a certain length of time. (create a text
file with enough characters to keep the program sending long enough, and
have the program read from that file.) After a while he got 'em all.


--
Ryan KC8PMX

Why is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but
it takes a whole box to start a barbecue?



I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -




Tony Lacy November 6th 03 09:51 AM

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
You know, I'm starting to get frustrated again. I can do nearly 20 wpm
listening to NuMorse with headphones and in a quiet room. But the leaast
bit of background noise, or the conditions on the air, and my speed
drops like a rock. I hope I'm not running up against my personal
limitations.

NuMorse Professional has a feature to add QRN in various flavors plus
QSB to the code. Tony. G4AUD. NuMorse developer.

Dee D. Flint November 7th 03 02:31 AM


"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
S. Hanrahan wrote:
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:19:49 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote:


I keep getting these images of you two listening to a ARRL Morse code CD
to fall asleep to, instead of the music most people would use! 8^)



I've worked pileups in my sleep the night after Field Day is over. heh
heh ;)


I'm guilty if that too!

- Mike KB3EIA -


Although I am only a casual contester, sometimes I'll hear CW in my sleep if
I've worked one harder than normal.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com