Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"opcom" wrote in message ... This was posted to ARLI, I don't know how many subscribe, but in spite of the numerous comments against BPL (transmitting wideband internet data over power lines, which will destroy the HF radio spectrum), the FCC seems disposed to encourage it anyway. evil! evil! just look up BPL on the web. T the noise from the radiated signals trashed the ham bands thoroughly. I guess you never heard that money talks and bull**** walks eh? Did you *REALLY THINK* that a couple hundred aging HF operating tightwad ham radio operators are going to stop an emerging technology that will conceivably network home appliances to the internet and be worth $BILLIONS$ in potential revenue ?? Jeezehus-H-christ...get F-N real !! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"recalcitrant ham op" wrote in message ... Another no-callsign anti-ham Troll. (yawn) Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
recalcitrant ham op wrote: Did you *REALLY THINK* that a couple hundred aging HF operating tightwad ham radio operators are going to stop an emerging technology that will conceivably network home appliances to the internet and be worth $BILLIONS$ in potential revenue ?? Hams are the least of the problems. There are many other users of the HF range who will be effected other than hams. Here's just a few: US Coast Guard makes high use of HF All branches of the military Many long distance marine comms are still on HF TransAtlantic and Pacific Air Traffic Control Comms are HF (Imagine if the ATC ground station can't hear an Aircraft call is position). And that's just a few services who are heavy uses of HF. George http://www.MilAirComms.com With DSL who needs BPL? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Right on --
retired merchant marine R/O N4GL GeorgeF wrote: recalcitrant ham op wrote: Did you *REALLY THINK* that a couple hundred aging HF operating tightwad ham radio operators are going to stop an emerging technology that will conceivably network home appliances to the internet and be worth $BILLIONS$ in potential revenue ?? Hams are the least of the problems. There are many other users of the HF range who will be effected other than hams. Here's just a few: US Coast Guard makes high use of HF All branches of the military Many long distance marine comms are still on HF TransAtlantic and Pacific Air Traffic Control Comms are HF (Imagine if the ATC ground station can't hear an Aircraft call is position). And that's just a few services who are heavy uses of HF. George http://www.MilAirComms.com With DSL who needs BPL? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"recalcitrant ham op" wrote in message ... "opcom" wrote in message ... This was posted to ARLI, I don't know how many subscribe, but in spite of the numerous comments against BPL (transmitting wideband internet data over power lines, which will destroy the HF radio spectrum), the FCC seems disposed to encourage it anyway. evil! evil! just look up BPL on the web. T the noise from the radiated signals trashed the ham bands thoroughly. I guess you never heard that money talks and bull**** walks eh? Did you *REALLY THINK* that a couple hundred aging HF operating tightwad ham radio operators are going to stop an emerging technology that will conceivably network home appliances to the internet and be worth $BILLIONS$ in potential revenue ?? Jeezehus-H-christ...get F-N real !! Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Here's what we do --- we built a (legal) KW rig into a van, install a
vertical- radiating antenna, cut out the roof and replace it with a fiberglass sheet. Drive directly underneath a power line with BPL running. Run lots of QSO's, and have at it. We're legal. Induced RF just might make them think twice about it. Yes, I know Ashcrofts boys are reading this --- Hi, muthers -- I live at the callbook address. Bring some beer when you come visiting. N4GL Frank Dresser wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Walter Treftz" wrote in message ... Here's what we do --- we built a (legal) KW rig into a van, install a vertical- radiating antenna, cut out the roof and replace it with a fiberglass sheet. Drive directly underneath a power line with BPL running. Run lots of QSO's, and have at it. We're legal. Induced RF just might make them think twice about it. Yes, I know Ashcrofts boys are reading this --- Hi, muthers -- I live at the callbook address. Bring some beer when you come visiting. N4GL Do you mean the way CBers made channel 5 unwatchable 25 years ago? I don't know much about BPL, but I think the TV analogy might hold. Given the bandwidth of BPL, there must be dozens, maybe hundreds of channels on the powerline. Can every one, or most of them, be wiped out? I'm thinking somebody came up with some pretty robust ways to deal with interference. But what if it does stop BPL? BPL isn't being backed because it's a technically elegant system. It's being backed by politics. Rural areas were critically important in the last Presidential election, and any candidiate would love to say something like "MY OPPONENT IS STOPPING ONE FORM OF HIGH SPEED INTERNET DISTRIBUTION ON BEHALF OF HIS PALS IN THE TELECOMMUNCATIONS INDUSTRY, BUT I PROMISE TO BRING IT IN, RIGHT ON YOUR POWER LINE, AS SOON AS I'M ELECTED!!" Of course, that would be a political misrepresentation, but politicans get away with worse every day. Politics turns into a numbers game. How many politicians or bureaucrats are saying anything negative about this goofy scheme? Politicians may not know physics, but they do know how to count. Frank Dresser |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message link.net... Sure we will. All we need to is put up KW level beacon stations. End of BPL. Dan/W4NTI Why would that end BPL? Frank Dresser The transmission lines are radiators. As such they will also receive. Power lines are right up next to the rigs. The RF from the radios will trash the BPL. Probably by causing drop outs and adding lots of extra delays. Basically it will make BPL useless anywhere near a ham station. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398  May 28, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | General |