BPL endorsed by FCC, another threat to HF ham radio
 

In article , Dick Carroll
writes:

It won't be just hams and other minor users of spectrum below 80 mHz
who will be very seriously impacted by BPL.

The lower limit of frequency allocations by both ITU-R and FCC is
3 KHz.

80 milliHertz is in the range of natural phenomena and not in any
radio regulations.

And a new attack method is born, to supplement Ad Hominem:

Ad Erratum

- Defined as attacking the typographical errors in a post, rather than
the message content of the post itself. This enables the functionally
illiterate to divert arguments based solely upon typing minutae....

A Usenet first. Well done, OM!

73, Leo

On 25 Sep 2003 20:56:27 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:

In article , Dick Carroll
writes:

It won't be just hams and other minor users of spectrum below 80 mHz
who will be very seriously impacted by BPL.

The lower limit of frequency allocations by both ITU-R and FCC is
3 KHz.

80 milliHertz is in the range of natural phenomena and not in any
radio regulations.

"Dick Carroll" wrote in message
...


Leo wrote:

And a new attack method is born, to supplement Ad Hominem:

Ad Erratum

- Defined as attacking the typographical errors in a post, rather than
the message content of the post itself. This enables the functionally
illiterate to divert arguments based solely upon typing minutae....

A Usenet first. Well done, OM!



Oh......you're still paying any attention to Putzie Poo??? Most of us
stopped even opening his postslong ago. We just toggle right on past
them. There never was anything worthwhile therein. No reason to suspect
anything has changed, or evver will. He's just another usenet troll.

Dick



Until Dick accidentally responds directly to a post.... ;)

Kim W5TIT