Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote:

I happen to think it's a case of turf defending...the PCTAs feel they
must defend their exclusive little slices of the RF spectrum at all
costs, regardless of what harm is done to the ARS in the process.
They'll kill the mother to save the baby.

What is a permitted method of expression, John?

I had been skipping over some of the "KC2HMZ" posts, mistaking
them for Bert...But NOW I remember why "HMZ" was familiar!

I find it unique that John takes the "turf defending" position
and makes the humorous suggestions about "kill the mother to save the
baby".

John was the listowner of an e mail reflector that used to "ban"
members from who didn't heel to his particular viewpoints and
opinions.

Unique how people who like to prevent others from expressing an
opposing viewpoint will jump on others for doing (allegedly) doing the
same thing.

How ya been, John?

Steve, K4YZ

"Steve Robeson, K4CAP" wrote in message
om...

I had been skipping over some of the "KC2HMZ" posts, mistaking
them for Bert...But NOW I remember why "HMZ" was familiar!

John was the listowner of an e mail reflector that used to "ban"
members from who didn't heel to his particular viewpoints and
opinions.

Hey, I think I've heard of John! Does he run the E-mail lists at TAPR? They
ban hams who don't go along with the TAPR "party line". They even banned
Hank Oredson W0RLI, who more or less invented packet BBS's and most of the
operating standards for them - from the TAPR BBS special interest group!
Hank offended TAPR by suggesting that hams use radio to communicate.

I dunno.... Maybe I'm getting him mixed up with John Ackerman. It was some
kind of "John", anyway.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL

Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote:


I happen to think it's a case of turf defending...the PCTAs feel they
must defend their exclusive little slices of the RF spectrum at all
costs, regardless of what harm is done to the ARS in the process.
They'll kill the mother to save the baby.

What is a permitted method of expression, John?


I had been skipping over some of the "KC2HMZ" posts, mistaking
them for Bert...But NOW I remember why "HMZ" was familiar!

I find it unique that John takes the "turf defending" position
and makes the humorous suggestions about "kill the mother to save the
baby".

John was the listowner of an e mail reflector that used to "ban"
members from who didn't heel to his particular viewpoints and
opinions.

Unique how people who like to prevent others from expressing an
opposing viewpoint will jump on others for doing (allegedly) doing the
same thing.


There are many people, that believe that one of their rights is
depriving others of their rights.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote:


I happen to think it's a case of turf defending...the PCTAs feel they
must defend their exclusive little slices of the RF spectrum at all
costs, regardless of what harm is done to the ARS in the process.
They'll kill the mother to save the baby.

What is a permitted method of expression, John?


I had been skipping over some of the "KC2HMZ" posts, mistaking
them for Bert...But NOW I remember why "HMZ" was familiar!

I find it unique that John takes the "turf defending" position
and makes the humorous suggestions about "kill the mother to save the
baby".

John was the listowner of an e mail reflector that used to "ban"
members from who didn't heel to his particular viewpoints and
opinions.

Unique how people who like to prevent others from expressing an
opposing viewpoint will jump on others for doing (allegedly) doing the
same thing.


There are many people, that believe that one of their rights is
depriving others of their rights.

Yep. Kaput-ski was one of them.

Steve, K4YZ