Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: Dwight: Because of that, few who oppose code testing, and even fewer Technicians, attend that club's meetings or socialize with the members. Find me a survey that is truly unbiased and I'll be glad to discuss the results. Until then,discussing the results of surveys is simply a waste of time. N2EY: Then consider the comments to the restructuring NPRM. I agree...surveys, votes, etc hold little sway with the FCC anyway. So you think Bill Cross is obfuscating when he says that FCC wants the ham community to decide what our rules are to be, for us to reach a concensus?? Not at all, but I also believe that when it is obvious to the FCC that a rule change is appropriate...even if a majority of hams oppose that change...the FCC will do what it believes is right and in the public interest. 98-143 serves as a bellweather to that since, if most hams favored 5wpm General and 12 wpm Extra, the FCC didn't buy it. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |