Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just saw another accusation of Pro-Coders as technically backwards.
Yet some of the most progressive RF Engineers and Technicians I know (who are Hams) are really enamored of Morse CW. I would challenge the NCTA's to show some proof that those who believe that the morse code test should be retained are in a technical backwater. I would also challenge them to do it without being abrasive or insulting. Just facts or intelligent informed opinions. Pro coders can help by refraining from name calling too. My statement is that there is no direct relationship. Anyone ready for a real discussion without the barbs? Can we do it? First person to start throwing insults only makes it look bad for his/her side. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |