Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This is
what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or
don't join our ranks!

73, Dan W7RF


"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...

"Twice Fired" wrote in message
...
Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central
indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle
and ocd. Truly pathetic...


HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys
passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and
violate
the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC?

I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate
filter to keep out the "CBplussers".

Clint
KB5ZHT

..
Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central
indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey
bottle
and ocd. Truly pathetic...


HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys
passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and
violate
the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC?

I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an
adequate
filter to keep out the "CBplussers".

Clint
KB5ZHT

Good point there Clint .... but you are assuming that these idiots, if
indeed they are doing the QRMing have passed a "CW test". I just wonder
since the FCC has gone to the test your own mode ...how much money has been
slipped to the testers for a CW pass. I am not going to go through the
trouble to play Jim Rockford or Bulldog Drummond on the above calls to see
if they were "gen-u-yine" FCC tested. I really believe that this crap
should have been stepped on in the years gone by. Police our "own" ....boy
that is something that sure works. The FCC should be in this area as in the
past This would entail a price for a ham ticket which knowing the
"generosity" of most hams I know, would stand the snowball's chance in Hades
of happening. Also on these same lines are the situations which guy's get
busted for doing neat things like interfering with aircraft, police et al.
You see in a lot of these cases that the FCC has reduced the fine ... huh
???.

I can say that I have been purposely QRMed on CW over the years in just a
handful of times. Most CW QRM is non intentional due to propagation
factors. I guess that the satisfaction for the QRMer is just not there to
justify a response he can't copy. Like was said before there Clint ... ya
can't fart on CW.


God Bless 73 Tom Popovic KI3R Belle Vernon Pa

You people are really dumb. Anybody can say anything and accuse anyone they
want, and you believe it. Amazing.

Dan/W4NTI

"Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message
news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02...
Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This
is
what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or
don't join our ranks!

73, Dan W7RF


"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...

"Twice Fired" wrote in message
...
Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central
indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey
bottle
and ocd. Truly pathetic...


HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys
passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and
violate
the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC?

I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an
adequate
filter to keep out the "CBplussers".

Clint
KB5ZHT

"Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message
news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02...
Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that.

Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of
thinking
to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses
you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like
that;
given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument
fails. Not
only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with
morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code
testing does not filter out the "yahoos".


You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it.

Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual
reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time.

This is
what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or
don't join our ranks!


....until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham.
THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing.

Clint
KB5ZHT