| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
If he's convicted, the kid's parents should be nailed with something too. Anyone who allows a pubescent child that a 40 something guy wants to pick up, take to his amusement park home and hop into bed with the kid (all those things are widely known) should be held responsible. (snip) I've thought about that too. But, how would we hold them responsible - stupidity isn't a crime in this country? Letting a child sleep with an adult is certainly stupid, but we'd have to prove more than that to actually hold the parents responsible. And I can't think of anything specific in the laws we can apply to the parents in this case. Child endangerment is the only thing that comes close, but I don't even think that would fly. To convict, you'd have to show the parents should have known there was a clear and present danger. Since JUST sleeping with an adult is not illegal, that may be a tough case to prove. Anyway, since you said "something" in the first paragraph (not anything specific), perhaps you're having the same problem I'm having. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES | General | |||
| FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew | |||
| FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew | |||