"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...

Whether you've noticed it by now or not, Kim, I have already acknowledged
the fact that you could have made a mistake in the use of the word
"hilarious"
in it's given context. However, your reaction is, as usual, to go on the
defensive, not accept responsibility for your mistake, and attempt to
backpedal
your way to a position of good standing. Did it ever occur to simply take
responsibility for your mistake, offer Dwight and the rest of the
newsgroup
a simple, heartfelt apology, and take your fat little fingers off the
keyboard
for a while? I didn't think so -- and the results were as predictable as
ever.

73 de Larry, K3LT


Y'know what, Larry? Phuck (HansTM) you and your patriarchal high horse you
ride around on. I owe *you* nor anyone else, *but* possibly Dwight, an
apology. I can nearly guarantee you that Dwight would know that I was not
commenting on the part about his brother. Now sit the phuck down and shut
the phuck up.

Kim W5TIT

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:


Y'know what, Larry? Phuck (HansTM) you and your patriarchal high horse you
ride around on. I owe *you* nor anyone else, *but* possibly Dwight, an
apology. I can nearly guarantee you that Dwight would know that I was not
commenting on the part about his brother. Now sit the phuck down and shut
the phuck up.

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

I neither stand nor speak while I'm typing at my computer keyboard.
And you're still a childish, boorish, ignorant person. You screwed up
and you'll never admit it, because you are totally self-centered. Whether
Dwight took offense or not, others have -- and that is what you should
be apologizing for. However, you're too self-centered to ever be able
to figure that out. You're pitiful.

73 de Larry, K3LT

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"

writes:


Y'know what, Larry? Phuck (HansTM) you and your patriarchal high horse
you
ride around on. I owe *you* nor anyone else, *but* possibly Dwight, an
apology. I can nearly guarantee you that Dwight would know that I was
not
commenting on the part about his brother. Now sit the phuck down and
shut
the phuck up.

Kim W5TIT

Kim:

I neither stand nor speak while I'm typing at my computer keyboard.
And you're still a childish, boorish, ignorant person. You screwed up
and you'll never admit it, because you are totally self-centered. Whether
Dwight took offense or not, others have -- and that is what you should
be apologizing for. However, you're too self-centered to ever be able
to figure that out. You're pitiful.

73 de Larry, K3LT



As stated, no one (*other* than possibly Dwight) was owed an apology. Have
you ever seen me demand an apology for being offended by you, Larry? And,
as has come to pass, Dwight was quite reasonable (something which you
neither understand nor are capable of) about how he understood the post.

And, as to your opinion of me--or anyone else, Larry--you are the last soul
on this Earth with whom I find any merit for anything done or not done by
others. Now, back to forgetting about responding to you since you drone on
with your impish, childish, boring, self-centered ignorance...

You and your *"Dr."* should have some tea...

Kim W5TIT

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

As stated, no one (*other* than possibly
Dwight) was owed an apology. Have
you ever seen me demand an apology for
being offended by you, Larry? And, as
has come to pass, Dwight was quite
reasonable (something which you neither
understand nor are capable of) about
how he understood the post. (snip)


Perhaps it might be a good idea to simply drop the matter while you're
still ahead, Kim. Your words were certainly questionable and could easily be
interpreted the way many others did. But I made a choice to interpret those
words differently to avoid additional confrontation. But that doesn't mean
that my chosen interpretation is really what you meant, or is now a defense
of what you said. Enough said.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Kim:

I neither stand nor speak while I'm typing at my computer keyboard.
And you're still a childish, boorish, ignorant person. You screwed up
and you'll never admit it, because you are totally self-centered. Whether
Dwight took offense or not, others have -- and that is what you should
be apologizing for. However, you're too self-centered to ever be able
to figure that out. You're pitiful.

73 de Larry, K3LT

As stated, no one (*other* than possibly Dwight) was owed an apology.

Kim:

On the contrary, your faux pas was offensive to many others. What made it
so is the fact that, as usual, it was posted with little or no thought given to
it's possible effect. And, in a nutshell, that's your main problem. You don't
seem to have any process of careful, thoughtful contemplation involved in
your postings. You simply make ill-considered, off-the-cuff reactions which,
invariably, get you in trouble. You have no intellectual credibility in this
newsgroup, and, I dare say, that is most likely the case in the rest of your
interpersonal and working relationships as well.

Have
you ever seen me demand an apology for being offended by you, Larry?

No, but I've never said anything to or about you which could be considered
offensive, Kim -- just truthful.

And,
as has come to pass, Dwight was quite reasonable (something which you
neither understand nor are capable of) about how he understood the post.

I was impressed with Dwight's restraint -- too bad you didn't exercise any
yourself, or we wouldn't be having this discussion now.

And, as to your opinion of me--or anyone else, Larry--you are the last soul
on this Earth with whom I find any merit for anything done or not done by
others.

I require no validation of my qualification to judge your behavior and
actions, Kim. I am an intelligent and educated person, who has developed
mature judgement and the ability to express myself with clarity and
conviction. OTOH, you have clearly demonstrated that you are none of
the above. Therefore, you're only wasting your time if you think you can
possibly discredit me in any way.

Now, back to forgetting about responding to you since you drone on
with your impish, childish, boring, self-centered ignorance...

Suit yourself.

You and your *"Dr."* should have some tea...

I would consider it an honor and a privilege to have tea with Dr. Laura
Schlessinger. If that fine day should ever come, rest assured, your
name will not be mentioned. I don't need her help in dealing with the
likes of you.

73 de Larry, K3LT

"Alun" wrote:

I don't know what to say, Dwight. You have
my sympathy, FWIW.


It was a long time ago, Alun. Thanks anyway, though.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Uh, 'scuse me. Knock knock. Larry just
made race the issue from his perspective?
Helloooooo. (snip)


Do try to separate the discussion in this newsgroup from potential court
proceedings, Kim. Larry was talking about the use of race as part of the
defense of Michael Jackson in any eventual court proceedings. I responded to
that. Since I seriously doubt either Larry or myself will be involved in any
court proceedings against Michael Jackson, any mention of race here is not
going to make race an issue there (in that court room).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that
you would be (and I don't think you would) as
childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to
think that I was including the story of your
brother in my "hilarious" comment, then you
would be wrong; however I apologize to you
if I implied that.


No apology needed, Kim. I interpreted that as you thinking it hilarious
that I would mention my brother's death in a discussion about Michael
Jackson. And perhaps it was not the best place to bring the subject up.
However, since Larry had mentioned race-riots, it gave me a very rare
opportunity to point out the wider impact of these riots (consequences far
outside the immediate area). I took advantage of that opportunity. In my
brother's case, the consequences were felt all the way across the country in
Florida. This message gives me an opportunity to also point out that these
wider consequences are rarely reported in the news.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that
you would be (and I don't think you would) as
childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to
think that I was including the story of your
brother in my "hilarious" comment, then you
would be wrong; however I apologize to you
if I implied that.


No apology needed, Kim. I interpreted that as you thinking it hilarious
that I would mention my brother's death in a discussion about Michael
Jackson. And perhaps it was not the best place to bring the subject up.
However, since Larry had mentioned race-riots, it gave me a very rare
opportunity to point out the wider impact of these riots (consequences far
outside the immediate area). I took advantage of that opportunity. In my
brother's case, the consequences were felt all the way across the country
in
Florida. This message gives me an opportunity to also point out that these
wider consequences are rarely reported in the news.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Well.... I am quite refreshed, Dwight. I would have lost all hope of
sanity for you if you'd pandered off the same crap Larry handed out...

Thanks...

Kim W5TIT

What the hell does this bull**** have to do with ham radio? Ever heard
of a FAQ for this group?

Kim W5TIT wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Oh, and by the way, Dwight. In the event that
you would be (and I don't think you would) as
childish as Larry, *if* you took the above to
think that I was including the story of your
brother in my "hilarious" comment, then you
would be wrong; however I apologize to you
if I implied that.


No apology needed, Kim. I interpreted that as you thinking it hilarious
that I would mention my brother's death in a discussion about Michael
Jackson. And perhaps it was not the best place to bring the subject up.
However, since Larry had mentioned race-riots, it gave me a very rare
opportunity to point out the wider impact of these riots (consequences far
outside the immediate area). I took advantage of that opportunity. In my
brother's case, the consequences were felt all the way across the country

in

Florida. This message gives me an opportunity to also point out that these
wider consequences are rarely reported in the news.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



Well.... I am quite refreshed, Dwight. I would have lost all hope of
sanity for you if you'd pandered off the same crap Larry handed out...

Thanks...

Kim W5TIT