Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 24th 03, 02:39 PM
Ryan, KC8PMX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Isn't it funny that a original post that had NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than the old code/no code debate???


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Jim Hampton" wrote:

Although way off topic (as are many threads
here), I couldn't resist this one.



Obviously, I couldn't resist the topic either (it appears the same is

true
for others). And, yes, it is certainly off-topic. However, I hope there is
room in this newgroup for less formal discussions also. After all, as ham
operators, we do like to talk, in some way or another, with others.

However,
for those who are not interested, I made sure the topic was very clear in
the subject line so they can easily skip the discussion.


(snip) I'll grant the one arguement that will
come up - there will be folks out to make
money. (snip)



Oh, you can bet your bottom dollar on that. Lawyer fees. Advertising for
the news organizations. Lawsuits. Book deals. Interviews. The lecture
circuit. Paparazzi. The tabloids. Money is going to be flying everywhere.


Personally, I think the guy is right off his rocker,
but the name of the game should be to protect
society (especially kids). (snip)



Yep. That's why I tried to avoid anything outside that in my original
message. If the guy wants to sleep in an oxygen tent (or not), more power

to
him (even if I do think it's a little strange).


(snip) I believe, and please correct me if I am
wrong, that he was never married until that mess
10 years ago or so. Suddenly, he gets married.
And divorced. And ... so on and so on.



I also found his sudden desire to get married somewhat questionable.


I totally agree with your accessment as to
classic symptoms of a pedophile. Neverland
should be renamed Never - Ever land. Why
just the kids and not the whole family? (snip)



I've always been interested in detective mysteries (in the Sherlock

Holmes
style), so have read a lot (both fiction and non-fiction) on the subject

of
criminals and law enforcement. Based on what I've read, Michael Jackson
seems to fit the classic picture of a pedophile.


Sorry for the long ramblings. I suspect, as do
you, that this case is going to be another media
circus court case. (snip)



What you wrote was well thought out, so was a joy to read. As for the
media circus, this case may reach an all time high (or low depending on

your
perspective).


If he isn't convicted, how old do these characters
get before their libido finally slows down? (snip)



Based on what I've read, quite old. Note that we're talking about a
diverse group here. Not all pedophiles seek actual sexual intercourse with
children. Some limit their activities to just looking at images of, or
photographing, young children. Others prefer to touch or fondle children

or
have children touch or fondle them, but may never go beyond that. And, of
course, some are seeking sexual intercourse. Whatever the case, the sex
drive tends to mirror the sex drive of a normal person. In general,

attempts
at actual sexual intercourse tends to slow down by the late thirties to
early fifties, but fondling and touching may continue for many years after
that. Some pedophiles have been arrested in their seventies or even
eighties.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



  #2   Report Post  
Old November 24th 03, 10:44 PM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote:

Isn't it funny that a original post that had
NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than
the old XXXX/no XXXX debate???



Please don't mention that word, Ryan. If we're careful, we may get the
record for the longest time without any significant discussion of that
subject. ;-)


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #3   Report Post  
Old November 25th 03, 12:39 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ryan, KC8PMX wrote:

Isn't it funny that a original post that had NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than the old code/no code debate???


Kind of refreshing in an OT sort of way........

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #4   Report Post  
Old November 25th 03, 12:32 AM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message
...
Isn't it funny that a original post that had NOTHING to do with AMATEUR
RADIO is getting more exposure than the old code/no code debate???


I think it goes to boredom with that topic...

Kim W5TIT


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES Arf! Arf! General 0 November 23rd 03 08:23 PM
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics RLucch2098 Homebrew 0 August 23rd 03 03:03 PM
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics RLucch2098 Homebrew 0 August 23rd 03 03:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017