Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
...... it's about the qualifications.
The incessant arguments here on rrap surround the question of whether or not there should be a Morse TEST for access to HF. Well, that's the wrong question. The real question is whether or not you should be Morse qualified for access to HF. If there is no regulatory need for Morse qualification, then there is no need for Morse testing. The need for Morse qualification, as clearly stated in the 1913 radio regulations was "The applicant must be able to transmit and receive in Continental Morse, at a speed sufficient to enable him to recognize distress calls or the official "keep-out" signals." Since that qualification need has long since disappeared, then so has the need for the qualification test. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Antique Test Equipment - collectible | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Antique Test Equipment - collectible | Boatanchors | |||
Tantalums and test eqpt. | Homebrew | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
replace cw test with typing test! | Policy |