Bush Thrills Troops, Hillary Doesn't
 

Bush Thrills Troops

so ****ing what ?

"ggg" wrote in message ...
Bush Thrills Troops

so ****ing what ?

How'd you like us to cancel that little NATO agreement, and let the
BEARS or POLES place your ungrateful socialist-leaning ass under their
rule?

Then, those pansy-assed French will start waving the white flags.

Faggots.

"stewart" wrote:

How'd you like us to cancel that little
NATO agreement, and let the BEARS
or POLES place your ungrateful
socialist-leaning ass under their rule?


If put to a vote today, I think many Europeans would be thrilled to end
NATO. Of course, since it benefits us (the USA), this country would strongly
resist that. In other words, what you say is nothing more than a shallow
threat (and the Europeans know it).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

"Brian" wrote:

Wow. I never knew that NATO benefitted
the USA. I always assumed that it was just
another welfare agency that sucked us dry.

So please detail the benefits that the USA
receives, and don't tell me it's an unlimited
supply of blue helmuts.


You need to study up on national defense, Brian. NATO, even today, is
critical to our strategic defense in that region of the world. Likewise,
bases in Europe play an important role in many lesser conflicts overseas
(refueling, supply, protection for ships passing through that area, area
commands, and so on). Europe could defend itself today. We benefit that
defense just as they benefit our defense. Therefore, we need those bases in
Europe just about as much as they need us.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

The only thing Hillary ever thrilled might have been Foster......poor man!!

http://www.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk./about.htm

Hi all,

Referring to the famous Baghdad dinner:

But in the next breath Rivera added, "They were even more impressed
with their turkey dinner."

Yes - and everybody knows that the turkey was a fake.

So was the bird on the plate.

ENJOY!

Igor

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message link.net...
"Brian" wrote:

Wow. I never knew that NATO benefitted
the USA. I always assumed that it was just
another welfare agency that sucked us dry.

So please detail the benefits that the USA
receives, and don't tell me it's an unlimited
supply of blue helmuts.

You need to study up on national defense, Brian.

True, I haven't been an instrument of national policy since December
31, 1996. Things have probably changed a lot.

NATO, even today, is
critical to our strategic defense in that region of the world. Likewise,
bases in Europe play an important role in many lesser conflicts overseas
(refueling, supply, protection for ships passing through that area, area
commands, and so on). Europe could defend itself today. We benefit that
defense just as they benefit our defense. Therefore, we need those bases in
Europe just about as much as they need us.

Dwight, things haven't changed -that- much. You've somehow rolled
national defense and NATO into the United Nations. It just isn't so.

Brian

"Brian" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:
NATO, even today, is critical to our
strategic defense in that region of the
world. Likewise, bases in Europe play
an important role in many lesser conflicts
overseas (refueling, supply, protection
for ships passing through that area, area
commands, and so on). Europe could
defend itself today. We benefit that
defense just as they benefit our defense.
Therefore, we need those bases in
Europe just about as much as they need
us.

Dwight, things haven't changed -that- much.
You've somehow rolled national defense
and NATO into the United Nations. It just
isn't so.


I did? I don't remember saying a single word about the United Nations. You
were talking about NATO ("I never knew that NATO benefited the USA," you
said). I responded to that. Our military relations with Europe is important
and NATO is a major part of that.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/