Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message . .. Dee D. Flint wrote: Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? It would not have worked well for sideband (although I have worked PA on ssb on it) as it is too low to the ground and the background noise on 160m is often high. I worked 4 hours Friday night and 4 hours Saturday night doing the "hunt and pounce" approach. This doesn't net a lot of stations but you find some interesting ones. Altogether I worked 104 stations in a total of 8 hours. The one I wonder about is where a person on Long Island finds room for a 160m antenna! I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. I've often thought the same myself. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! As they say: any antenna is better than no antenna! Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx |