Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this
weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee D. Flint wrote:
Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message . .. Dee D. Flint wrote: Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? It would not have worked well for sideband (although I have worked PA on ssb on it) as it is too low to the ground and the background noise on 160m is often high. I worked 4 hours Friday night and 4 hours Saturday night doing the "hunt and pounce" approach. This doesn't net a lot of stations but you find some interesting ones. Altogether I worked 104 stations in a total of 8 hours. The one I wonder about is where a person on Long Island finds room for a 160m antenna! I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. I've often thought the same myself. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! As they say: any antenna is better than no antenna! Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee D. Flint wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message . .. Dee D. Flint wrote: Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? It would not have worked well for sideband (although I have worked PA on ssb on it) as it is too low to the ground and the background noise on 160m is often high. I worked 4 hours Friday night and 4 hours Saturday night doing the "hunt and pounce" approach. This doesn't net a lot of stations but you find some interesting ones. Altogether I worked 104 stations in a total of 8 hours. The one I wonder about is where a person on Long Island finds room for a 160m antenna! I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. I've often thought the same myself. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! As they say: any antenna is better than no antenna! hehe, try telling that to some of the r.r.a.antenns group! Of course the guru's there are operating in rarified atmosphere. (no disrespect, there are some mighty knowledgeable people there - it's just that a person can start a thread, and the first one or two answers answer the problem, then the thread turns into a antenna minutae free for all. Hmm sounds familiar!! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee D. Flint" wrote Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Sorry I missed you, but Michigan was well represented. We only operated for about 2 hours, so our score is just over 10,000. Heard W4NTI at about esp-level, but QSB was bad, so I didn't try to call him. I wonder who was operating KV4FZ --- pretty sure it wasn't Herb, because the operator was really stumbling. Getting ready for the 10M contest next. K0CKB and I will do a sort of multi/multi split between A1 and A3. 73, Hans, K0HB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Dee D. Flint wrote: Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! - Mike KB3EIA - Wow, as a newbie I had EXACTLY the opposite experience. I was a Novice and could hardly hear or work anyone on CW. After upgrading to Tech, I was talked in to cutting my 40M dipole down to 10M (because I upgraded about the same time as the Novice Enhancement came along), and got on 10M SSB. WOWEE!!! That was what all the hubub was about! And my 10M antenna was tied off to a crabapple tree at 8', and the other end was tied off to the gutter at about 12'. Yup, CW gets through when everything else will - sometimes. Brian |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message t...
hehe, try telling that to some of the r.r.a.antenns group! Of course the guru's there are operating in rarified atmosphere. ditto here. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Your a real go getter Dee D. Congrats. Next time try an inverted L. They say you need radials, but I don't have any, yet. Works good. Dan/W4NTI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian" wrote in message m... Mike Coslo wrote in message ... Dee D. Flint wrote: Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Only had a random wire at less than 10ft off the ground but worked stations from Maine to S. Texas. Wow. I wonder how many you would have worked on 160 with that antenna if you had been using ssb? I think that is one of the things that may dissapoint new hams that may when the CW requirement is gone, (which I have predicted to happen about the bottom of the sunspot cycle) and they get on the air, and they don't do a whole lot after that? They will wonder what all the hubub was about. Whereas you worked a lot of the US with an antenna that by all rights shouldn't work much at all! - Mike KB3EIA - Wow, as a newbie I had EXACTLY the opposite experience. I was a Novice and could hardly hear or work anyone on CW. After upgrading to Tech, I was talked in to cutting my 40M dipole down to 10M (because I upgraded about the same time as the Novice Enhancement came along), and got on 10M SSB. WOWEE!!! That was what all the hubub was about! And my 10M antenna was tied off to a crabapple tree at 8', and the other end was tied off to the gutter at about 12'. Yup, CW gets through when everything else will - sometimes. Brian Here is something you can use in your life Brian; It takes two things to communicate, an operator at both ends. Everything will radiate, its the degree of effeciency thereof. Have a nice day. Dan/W4NTI |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote Just wanted to say I had a great time working the 160m CW contest this weekend. Sorry I missed you, but Michigan was well represented. We only operated for about 2 hours, so our score is just over 10,000. Heard W4NTI at about esp-level, but QSB was bad, so I didn't try to call him. I wonder who was operating KV4FZ --- pretty sure it wasn't Herb, because the operator was really stumbling. Getting ready for the 10M contest next. K0CKB and I will do a sort of multi/multi split between A1 and A3. 73, Hans, K0HB Sorry I missed you. That was probably on Friday evening when I was doing my CQ thing. I didn't do much of that on Saturday. Really didn't get into it much. But condx were hot. I think it was the Herpster. He called me by name. So maybe he was having a bad day too.. hi. But his signal was s3 on Friday. ANd S9 on Saturday. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx |