| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote:
I'd agree with that in general principle. But it strikes me that the ability to recognize the symbols for various electronic components in a simple schmatic and to be able to navigate an elementary block diagram would be essential to even the most elementary troubleshooting and repair tasks that we'd expect a General class amateur to be able to accomplish. How many symbols are there now, Hans? A hundred or more? How much can we include in the license tests before they become massive in size and overwhelming in nature? We have to draw a line somewhere on what to include and I'm satisfied with where that line is drawn now. By the way, the Technician question pool I studied (July 97 ~ June 01 pool) did include some simple block diagrams (transmitter and receiver), basic symbols (resisters, capacitors, and so on), and even a couple of simple schematics. One certainly couldn't build anything with that, but it was a good introduction. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Heathkit HW-101 | Boatanchors | |||
| eScrew zen story | Antenna | |||
| Civil Defense symbols | Boatanchors | |||
| TEM planar diagrams vs. wireframe zeppelins | Antenna | |||