Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee,
Agreed, the paragraph that you quote simply recognizes the value of public service comms, no mandate or authorization is expressed or implied. I'm surprised, though, that an organization as large as the ARRL would carry such a statement on their site without something to back it up - an error, perhaps, or they found a lost FCC scroll, or ? Has anyone emailed them to inquire just exactly where they got this mandate idea from? I'm a ARRL member, and would be willing to do so if you wish! 73, Leo On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:55:30 GMT, "Dee D. Flint" wrote: "Leo" wrote in message .. . Dee, The belief that a mandate for anateur radio to participate in public service communications is quite common - just did a quick search on Google, and II have attached an ARRL reference as well as one amateur radio club, who both clearly call it a "mandate". Not sure where in the regs this is, or whether it is an interpretation of the Part 97 sections already quoted. 73, Leo ARRL: http://www2.arrl.org/qst/features-columns.html : Public Service: Our mandate from the FCC includes the need to put our knowledge and equipment to use in service to our fellow citizens. Every month you'll read about what your fellow hams are doing to fulfill this promise of service to their communities. Kentucky Amateur Radio Web Site - ARES Operator Registration http://www.qsl.net/kyham/forms/aresreg.html Thank you very much for having the desire to serve your community, and help to fulfill Amateur Radio's FCC mandate of public service in time of emergency. These mistakes are quite common Leo and sometimes are fostered intentionally just to make a good show. This is why every ham should read Part 97 from beginning to end. The exact words in Part 97.1a are as follows (and this is the only place public service is even mentioned. 97.1a "Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur radio service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications." This wording certainly is no mandate or authorization. It's a recognition of what we do and what we have always done. While public service is indeed a time honored and honorable tradition and something that we should continue to do, the FCC regs can hardly be construed to be either a mandate or an authorization. However, political grandstanding for selling your cause is also a long and time honored tradition. I don't really agree with such actions (even on the part of the ARRL) but calling a house a castle doesn't make it one. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |