|
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP ... (was - New Candidate for 'Youngest Extra') From: (William) Date: 4/4/2004 5:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... The many threads that you sponsor are usually titled, "Lend Steps in own Feces" or some such other lunacy. There is no selectivity. You bring criticism upon yourself for being such a jerk. (1) Who's "Lend"...?!?! obvious typo (2) If "Lend", or whoever, wasn't making so many stupid, easily refuted misrepresentations about Amateur Radio in general or certain persons in particular, threads like those you mention wouldn't show up. You don't know who "Lend" is, but you're certain he's "...making so many stupid, easily refuted misrepresentations...blah blah horesecrap." That makes you a liar. Again. Suck it up, Steve. No dodges. Admit you were wrong. (3) As for "selectivity", I believe I've been VERY selective. Unless you can prove differently? Yeh. Now you're going after a guy named, "Lend." |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP ... (was - New Candidate for 'Youngest Extra') From: (Len Over 21) Date: 4/5/2004 1:45 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Holy man, mad as heck and not taking it anymore) writes: So here's a challenge for you, Len: Let's see you set the example of "civil debate". That means no name-calling, no little digs at other people's jobs, names, license classes, ethnicities or religions, no making fun of their favorite modes. It also means clear distinctions between facts and opinions. Please give us the entire listing of what is correct. Please issue the proper and correct stage directions so that all may act upon it without error. Please, your holiness, lead us not into temptation of the terrible independent thought! All shall be as you ordain, all shall be right with the world. And it means behaving that way even if someone disagrees with you, or disproves some claim you make here. Yea, verily we shall all strive to act in the manner you have shown us as leadership, your holiness. Go ahead, Len. Show us how it's done. I'll follow if you lead. If you choose to behave the way you typically have done here for the past 7 years or so, I'll just ignore you. Oh! Please! Not that! To be ignored by the Holiest of Holy Men! I stand abshed with head bowed before your majestic divinity and humbly ask forgiveness for having the temerity to express independent thought. Jim, I think this pretty well answered any "questions" about Lennie's ability or willinginess to be "civil". Steve, The use of name-calling, insults, and other personal attacks is often an indication that the attacker does not have a counterargument. Rather than admit that he or she is mistaken, the attacker tries to divert attention from the facts. We see this in the very first line of Len's post: "(Holy man, mad as heck and not taking it anymore)" and continuing all through it. Also, this sort of behavior tries to get the person attacked to reply in kind. If that happens, the attacker has "won" because he or she has dragged the attacked person down to the attacker's level, and has avoided the actual subject of discussion completely. The fact that the attacker was wrong is lost in the noise. So your use of words like "Lennie", "putz", "loser", and "idiot" (to name just a few) actually gives Len exactly what he wants. It's like the situation where a child argues with a parent over bedtime *at* bedtime. If the parent argues, the child "wins" because bedtime is, by definition, being extended by the time spent arguing. And the child will do more of the same, because it "works". Replying to Len in kind teaches him that his methods "work". Indeed, replying to him at all teaches him that. The solution is obvious. PLONK 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP
From: Mike Coslo Date: 4/6/2004 8:03 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP So how do you see your own posts, Hans? Yah. I kind of miss how he used to call me stupid! ;^) Some folks have a very unique way of calling you or accusing you of something, all-the-while being up to thier necks in it themsleves, albeit in a more, uh..."subtle" way. And they can call me anything they want as long as they don't call me later to dinner! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
In article .net, "KØHB"
writes: "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote | I will simply start to "kill-file" the | offending parties' posts. | | 73, | Carl - wk3c It works wonders, Carl. Since implementing a disciplined screening protocol the noise level has dropped about 30dB here. Most of the messages I see actually pertain to amateur radio policy. Question of the Day, oh noble sage of the brush: If "disciplined screening protocol" has been implemented, how do you know what is "noise" and what is not? Are you reading by means of morse code? Ahhhh, the world awaits enlightenment from your words...! Oink. LHA / WMD |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP ... (was - New Candidate for 'Youngest Extra') From: (William) Date: 4/4/2004 5:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... The many threads that you sponsor are usually titled, "Lend Steps in own Feces" or some such other lunacy. There is no selectivity. You bring criticism upon yourself for being such a jerk. (1) Who's "Lend"...?!?! obvious typo (2) If "Lend", or whoever, wasn't making so many stupid, easily refuted misrepresentations about Amateur Radio in general or certain persons in particular, threads like those you mention wouldn't show up. You don't know who "Lend" is, but you're certain he's "...making so many stupid, easily refuted misrepresentations...blah blah horesecrap." That makes you a liar. Again. Suck it up, Steve. No dodges. Admit you were wrong. (3) As for "selectivity", I believe I've been VERY selective. Unless you can prove differently? Yeh. Now you're going after a guy named, "Lend." Freudian slip? From mortgage problems? Negative cash flow? He needs to call "9-1-1" complete with all those dash numbers. :-) LHA / WMD |
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP ... (was - New Candidate for 'Youngest Extra') From: (William) Date: 4/4/2004 5:17 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Take a little personal responsibility for yourself. I do, Brian. I accept responsibility for what I post. That's why when I post something that is later proven to be other than what I suggested it was I say "I stand corrected" or otherwise acknowledge my error. There is no evidence of that. You have yet to do that despite having been proven "wrong" over and over. You say "proof," yet you have none. He "has it in his wallet..." He "has it right there..." He "has it in his records..." All safe and snug right there...except nobody can see any of it. Must be the post-traumatic thing from his "seven hostile actions?" :-) LHA / WMD |
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Proposal to rename RRAP From: "KØHB" Date: 4/5/2004 10:42 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: .net It works wonders, Carl. Since implementing a disciplined screening protocol the noise level has dropped about 30dB here. Most of the messages I see actually pertain to amateur radio policy. So how do you see your own posts, Hans? Yah. I kind of miss how he used to call me stupid! ;^) - Mike KB3EIA - I miss being his favorite "dump huck." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com