Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#301
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#302
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JJ wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote: Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I find the group much more pleasent and interesting since I started ignoring posts by lenny the lame, steveie the stupid, and wee willie winkie. JJ, I'm sure it is much more pleasant from your perspective. You see no evil, hear no evil, but spew as much of it as your mean little heart desires. It is fairly cowardous of you to malign a ham by callsign who isn't even posting here, yet you remain anonymous. Time for you to authenticate. |
#303
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "Bill Sohl"
writes: I also agree with Carl's concerns and would "HOPE" that enough of us can just ignore the obvious dumb, stupid bickering about individuals and personalities and just try to stay on topic. Cheers to all who use common sense, logic and a few ounces of forthought before posting :-) Bill K2UNK Thanks, Bill! 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#304
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes: I hereby propose that we rename RRAP to "rec.Steve, Len, and a few others rag on each other endlessly.alt" and create a new newsgroup for those of us who really would like to discuss amateur radio regulatory and policy issues ... I'm getting REALLY tired of all of this endless, childish bickering that is OT and doesn't belong here ... most days, it's hard to find the stuff that this newsgroup is supposed to be for because of the volume of petty, personal bickering that you guys load the newsgroup up with ... Carl: I don't know about you, but I certainly don't waste much time reading the Steve/Lennie sandbox fight! That's strictly between them! I search the newsgroup using certain keywords, and usually find the postings I'm interested in reading. I occasionally amuse myself by tossing a few word grenades toward Lennie and a few select others, but I don't maintain a long, drawn-out pitched battle with them. I guess you could say that this newsgroup is what you make of it, and lately, I don't make very much of it at all. 73 de Larry, K3LT Or, alternatively, you guys can go rag on each other in rec.radio.amateur.misc like it used to be (and why this group was created in the first place if memory serves me correctly - to provide a place for the serious regulatory/policy discussion after rec.radio.amateur.misc turned into the sort of argue_about_off_topic_things fest that you guys have going on here ... OK, there ... I've said my peace and now you can tell me to [expletive deleted for Jim's benefit] off ... Carl - wk3c |
#305
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , "Ryan, KC8PMX" writes: Jim: I haven't been watching the newsgroups as much myself....... When there is less than 5% of actual good debate/discussion on a topic (no matter how risque it is) it is not worth my time to wade through the arguments. Agreed, Ryan. I have found it very effective to either killfile the worst offenders, or simply skim until the general tone of the post becomes apparent. Often it's clear from the first line that a post isn;t worth my time. I have had a schedule change which doesn't allow me the flexibility to respond like I used to. I use AutoAol, which downloads email and newsgroup posts so I can respond at leisure and save or delete as desired. Doesn't tie up the phone line and deletions are almost instantaneous. I currently use Outlook Express, which seems to work fine for me..... it's merely scheduling the time to respond I guess. Than and pursuing Fire Officer 1,2,3 and yet another Associates and Bachelor degrees, my time is severely limited. Good luck on your continuing education. Thank you! I am a big believer in education and training, and hope to see that rub off onto others. I do miss some of the debates/discussions of the past. Let's see what topics of policy or procedure we can actually discuss, without fighting about it..... How about this one: "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow homebrewing-from-scratch? Canada and the UK have such a class". 73 de Jim, N2EY That would be a good one or there are many other topics I think may be good..... Ryan KC8PMX |
#306
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote | How about this one: | | "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow | homebrewing-from-scratch?" Here comes Jim with another of his "Appliance Operator Class License" strawmen. Excuse me while I **** some flaming napalm on it. (ooopppsss, uh, I musta meant to say "void my bladder for the nursie") While I can't remember the last "fully homebrew" shack I saw (probably KG6AIG back in the 60's, and even Luis had *some* commercial test equipment items lying about), it is extremely uncommon to find a shack where every item is commercial (or in it's original commercial state.) Homebrewing and modification to commercial designs is especially alive and well in the QRP, contesting, satelite, and microwave communities. The QCAO (Quarter Century Appliance Operators club) and ASSOOBA (Amalgamated Simple Shacks On Our Belt Association) would love it, but this idea would put our service on an immediate slide into nothing more than another consumer orientated Family Radio Service, and the consequent abolishment of Amateur Radio. The *single* unique element which differentiates our service from all the other radio services is our authority to experiment, build, modify, and generally tinker around and operate equipment which is not type accepted. The "technical" aspect of our hobby comprises 3 of the 5 reasons (paragraph 97.1) for the existence of the ARS, and removal of this requirement for licensing would tear the heart and soul out of the hobby. If even a single class of amateurs were to be licensed without any requirement for electronics knowledge, then it follows that type acceptance of amateur equipment would be a requirement for sale to those induhviduals. Used equipment, if sold to "no-Tech" amateurs would need to be recertified and "mod-free", and repairs could only be accomplished by FCC-approved service facilities. The cost of new equipment would rise to commercial-service price levels, because of type-acceptance issues, and most vendors would probably leave the market. Code-Free, then Tech-Free .... what next, license free? 73, de Hans, K0HB ô¿ô -- SOC # 291 http://www.qsl.net/soc/ FISTS # 7419 http://www.fists.org NCI # 4304 http://www.nocode.org/ |
#307
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Proposal for a no-Tech license class
From: "KØHB" Date: 4/18/2004 12:12 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: t "N2EY" wrote | How about this one: | | "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow | homebrewing-from-scratch?" Here comes Jim with another of his "Appliance Operator Class License" strawmen. Excuse me while I **** some flaming napalm on it. (ooopppsss, uh, I musta meant to say "void my bladder for the nursie") No problem, Hans. You're the one with the two-face complex, not me. Cuss all you want. It only sets the stage for "What Can We Believe From Hans"...You express your angst about MY posting habits, yet you make liberal use of insults, profanity and snide insults to "express" yourself. Code-Free, then Tech-Free .... what next, license free? Hey...YOU joined "NCI"...You helped to get us here. Now you're complaining...?!?! NCI # 4304 http://www.nocode.org/ Uh huh...that's what I thought. Steve, K4YZ |
#308
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KØHB wrote: "N2EY" wrote | How about this one: | | "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow | homebrewing-from-scratch?" Here comes Jim with another of his "Appliance Operator Class License" strawmen. Excuse me while I **** some flaming napalm on it. Aww man, that makes me cringe just thinking about it! But penicillin will take care of it in a week or so... (ooopppsss, uh, I musta meant to say "void my bladder for the nursie") While I can't remember the last "fully homebrew" shack I saw (probably KG6AIG back in the 60's, and even Luis had *some* commercial test equipment items lying about), it is extremely uncommon to find a shack where every item is commercial (or in it's original commercial state.) Homebrewing and modification to commercial designs is especially alive and well in the QRP, contesting, satelite, and microwave communities. The QCAO (Quarter Century Appliance Operators club) and ASSOOBA (Amalgamated Simple Shacks On Our Belt Association) would love it, but this idea would put our service on an immediate slide into nothing more than another consumer orientated Family Radio Service, and the consequent abolishment of Amateur Radio. The *single* unique element which differentiates our service from all the other radio services is our authority to experiment, build, modify, and generally tinker around and operate equipment which is not type accepted. The "technical" aspect of our hobby comprises 3 of the 5 reasons (paragraph 97.1) for the existence of the ARS, and removal of this requirement for licensing would tear the heart and soul out of the hobby. If even a single class of amateurs were to be licensed without any requirement for electronics knowledge, then it follows that type acceptance of amateur equipment would be a requirement for sale to those induhviduals. Used equipment, if sold to "no-Tech" amateurs would need to be recertified and "mod-free", and repairs could only be accomplished by FCC-approved service facilities. The cost of new equipment would rise to commercial-service price levels, because of type-acceptance issues, and most vendors would probably leave the market. Code-Free, then Tech-Free .... what next, license free? Aren't you *agreeing* with Jim here? I mean I agree with what you wrote here, and I agree with Jim that it isn't a good idea to have a "no homebrew class". Help a dumb guy out here! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#309
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Proposal for a no-Tech license class From: "KØHB" Date: 4/18/2004 12:12 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: t "N2EY" wrote | How about this one: | | "Is it a good idea to have an class of license that does not allow | homebrewing-from-scratch?" Here comes Jim with another of his "Appliance Operator Class License" strawmen. Excuse me while I **** some flaming napalm on it. (ooopppsss, uh, I musta meant to say "void my bladder for the nursie") No problem, Hans. You're the one with the two-face complex, not me. Cuss all you want. It only sets the stage for "What Can We Believe From Hans"...You express your angst about MY posting habits, yet you make liberal use of insults, profanity and snide insults to "express" yourself. Code-Free, then Tech-Free .... what next, license free? Hey...YOU joined "NCI"...You helped to get us here. Now you're complaining...?!?! Its a continuum. All things are related, and all actions have more consequences than expected. More's the pity, since something good could be salvaged from the present situation without the Element 1 test. Now it is mutating into something that can really damage the Amateur Radio Service. - Mike, KB3EIA - sometimes the worst thing to do to people is to give them what they ask for. |
#310
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote | | Help a dumb guy out here! | About once every 2 or 3 fortnights, Jim drags out this old bedraggled strawman. It is always a question which in one form or another asks "I don't want to be involved in this techie crap... I just wanna talk on ra-did-eo, so why don't they have an amateur license for me?" And just as regularly as Jim drags out this nontribution (no, I didn't misspell 'contribution') to the future of amateur radio, I am compelled to try to convince him the idea is a non-starter. But if Jim is nothing else, he is a persistent cuss, so lurk along with me and before long you'll see his strawman skulking again here on rrap asking...... "If I don't wanna be an amateur radio techie, why do I gotta take these stupid tests. It just ain't fair! I'm gonna go join the QCAO!" 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extra class - question about the test | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
1x2 Calls--automatic when upgrading to Extra? | Policy |