Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
elf. Go ahead, make our day, put a pacemaker wearer right next to a mismatched 1 KW transmitter connected to an antenna with open-wire lines. Do you want to "experiment" with something that might kill a person? Would the gunnery nurse do that? Go re-read my post again about the ham and the pacemaker incident. A pacemaker was placed next to the operating position of the hams station and operated at the full legal limit. Nothing happened to the pacemaker. Senility is really affecting your reading comprehension lennyboy. Now go back to the front desk and ask the kind nurse to point you the way to your room so you can lay down and get your afternoon nappie in. |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
I'm not blaming "all those nasty hams." :-) Just the PHONIES with federal merit badges in here who think they are all gunnery nurse candidates in search of a real self. :-) Your aren't even a ham, can't pass the test, have nothing to do with ham radio, so why would you even care? Show me one ham with a federal merit badge. |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JJ wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: I'm not blaming "all those nasty hams." :-) Just the PHONIES with federal merit badges in here who think they are all gunnery nurse candidates in search of a real self. :-) Your aren't even a ham, can't pass the test, have nothing to do with ham radio, so why would you even care? Show me one ham with a federal merit badge. TSBAKAL believes that his one and only appearance before an FCC examiner in 1950-something was all that he should have ever had to do...He passed THAT test, ergo he "knows it all" and should be exempt from the laws that pertain to every other citizen. What a putz. Steve, K4YZ |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , JJ
writes: Len Over 21 wrote: Go re-read my post again about the ham and the pacemaker incident. A pacemaker was placed next to the operating position of the hams station and operated at the full legal limit. Nothing happened to the pacemaker. Anonymous source of unreferenceable news, anonymous none? You really shouldn't make up those stories. They aren't believable and they have no references for anyone to check validity. Senility is really affecting your reading comprehension lennyboy. Now, now, Anonymous None, be careful or you will lose fantasy and imagination privileges... :-) LHA / WMD |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
Anonymous source of unreferenceable news, anonymous none? You really shouldn't make up those stories. They aren't believable and they have no references for anyone to check validity. Check with the Dallas, Tx FCC office, they can verify it. And here is another, get some 6 year old to read it and explaine to you so you will understand. **** HAM RADIO AND PACEMAKERS This is from Angela, VE7ANG’s Newsletter. Richard/VE7SRB has had a pacemaker installed recently. At first he thought he might not be able to continue Ham Radio, but after some research he came up with the following. Perhaps it will be of interest to others. We have researched the literature concerning the effects of amateur radio broadcasts and their potential effects on implanted pulse generators. Most articles concerning the effects of electromagnetic interference (EMI) on pulse generators touch very briefly on the effects of radio frequencies. We have done testing on types of interference most likely to be encountered by pacemakers patients. One category of interference we tested was radio frequency. This covers the HF and VHF bands from 1 MHz to 200 Mhz. Amateur radio, broadcast AM and FM, TV two way communications, short-wave diathermy and CB radios are in this range. Many transmitters have large power capability. Radio amateurs are allowed a one kilowatt input in eight bands, commercial short-wave goes to 250 KW, broadcast to 50 KW, two way radio in emergency short-wave regularly uses 150 watts in mobile installations. Implantable pulse generators may be affected depending on the details of shielding and filtering in the device and modulation of interference signal. Testing was performed on 106 pacemakers comprising 20 different models from various manufacturers. Testing was conducted at interference frequencies of 3.4, 7, 14, 21 and 28.6 Mhz. No effects on pacemaker operation were observed in the presence of field strengths less than 200 volts/meter. Field strengths of this magnitude are unlikely except in the immediate vicinity of a high power transmitting antenna. Overall, our testing indicates that pacemaker patients are very unlikely to encounter problems with radio frequency fields. Certainly we would recommend avoiding direct contact with transmitting antenna. ******* Now go ask the nurse for another blood pressure pill lennyboy so you don't have a stroke. |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPRM and VEC | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse coderequirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
7 MHz band expansion approved | Dx |