lookin for BC-610
 

Jim Hampton wrote:

Hello, Dave

Can I start one with Hammarlund? :))

Now you've done it, Jim. Foghorn Lenhorn will treat us to a
dissertation on the history of the company and let us all in on how long
it has been since Hammarlund produced a receiver.

Dave K8MN

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

Naw, the first sign of brain rot is the inability to spot a
Hallicrafters troll.

AW**** DAVE, HELP ME GET UP OFF THE FLOOR WILLYA?? OmGawd, I cain't
breath . . priceless . .

"Priceless?" Kellie, you have a very low-value humor.

Herr robust can't tuff tawk anything technical in raddio or hamhistory
so he goes to his "workshop" and fabricates low-tech falseness to
use as a "subject" in a ham radio policy newsgroup.

Come on back with some more Tales of the South Pacific and your
bear-shooting for naval intelligence plus all that techtawk about
28 VDC jeeps in WW2 and how they all were mounted with ARC-5s.

Bill Halligan's company Hallicrafters has a proud history in radio in
the United States. Located in a part of Chicago (also the starting
city for Paul Galvin's Motorola), it isn't in the refined, sophisticated
east where hoagie munching and gaz tawk is predominant and some
denizens secretly want to be Sopranos. Chicago is in the midwest,
apparently in your mental concept of the "western frontier."

A BC-610 is a very old transmitter design, went obsolete many many
years ago in the military and everywhere else (except in memories
of olde-tyme hamme raddio types still glorying in long-past history
they were never a part of). Hallicrafters has been GONE for three
decades as a radio producer, and the name/logo has been GONE
for two decades. Hallicrafters is DEFUNCT in the quaint speech of
the raddio kops in this newsgroup.

It is GONE, DEFUNCT like the glorious memories of derring-do and
raddio pioneering of the heroic, stalwart, macho morsemen of olde.
You just continue to press on (weakly) in personal insults of others
not kissing your [expletive deleted] and brilliant technical intellects.
Such paints such a cozy picture of enthusing others to be just like
you and herr robust in U.S. hum raddio.

'Enthusing?' No, more like euthanasia.

Keep up your morse. Take morse viagra.

LHA / WMD

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

Naw, the first sign of brain rot is the inability to spot a
Hallicrafters troll.

AW**** DAVE, HELP ME GET UP OFF THE FLOOR WILLYA?? OmGawd, I cain't
breath . . priceless . .

"Priceless?" Kellie, you have a very low-value humor.

Herr robust can't tuff tawk anything technical in raddio or hamhistory
so he goes to his "workshop" and fabricates low-tech falseness to
use as a "subject" in a ham radio policy newsgroup.

Come on back with some more Tales of the South Pacific and your
bear-shooting for naval intelligence plus all that techtawk about
28 VDC jeeps in WW2 and how they all were mounted with ARC-5s.

Bill Halligan's company Hallicrafters has a proud history in radio in
the United States. Located in a part of Chicago (also the starting
city for Paul Galvin's Motorola), it isn't in the refined, sophisticated
east where hoagie munching and gaz tawk is predominant and some
denizens secretly want to be Sopranos. Chicago is in the midwest,
apparently in your mental concept of the "western frontier."

A BC-610 is a very old transmitter design, went obsolete many many
years ago in the military and everywhere else (except in memories
of olde-tyme hamme raddio types still glorying in long-past history
they were never a part of). Hallicrafters has been GONE for three
decades as a radio producer, and the name/logo has been GONE
for two decades. Hallicrafters is DEFUNCT in the quaint speech of
the raddio kops in this newsgroup.

It is GONE, DEFUNCT like the glorious memories of derring-do and
raddio pioneering of the heroic, stalwart, macho morsemen of olde.
You just continue to press on (weakly) in personal insults of others
not kissing your [expletive deleted] and brilliant technical intellects.
Such paints such a cozy picture of enthusing others to be just like
you and herr robust in U.S. hum raddio.

'Enthusing?' No, more like euthanasia.

Keep up your morse. Take morse viagra.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes:

Naw, the first sign of brain rot is the inability to spot a
Hallicrafters troll.

AW**** DAVE, HELP ME GET UP OFF THE FLOOR WILLYA?? OmGawd, I cain't
breath . . priceless . .

"Priceless?" Kellie, you have a very low-value humor.

It looks pretty funny from here, Lynnard.

Herr robust can't tuff tawk anything technical in raddio or hamhistory
so he goes to his "workshop" and fabricates low-tech falseness to
use as a "subject" in a ham radio policy newsgroup.

I didn't offer you the hook, Leonard. I only commented on the
aftermath.
The bait was dangled. You swallowed it and ran with it. You must be
all tuckered out.

Come on back with some more Tales of the South Pacific and your
bear-shooting for naval intelligence plus all that techtawk about
28 VDC jeeps in WW2 and how they all were mounted with ARC-5s.

What has any of that to do with the results of the Big Hallicrafters
Fishing Expedition of 2004?

Bill Halligan's company Hallicrafters has a proud history in radio in
the United States. Located in a part of Chicago (also the starting
city for Paul Galvin's Motorola), it isn't in the refined, sophisticated
east where hoagie munching and gaz tawk is predominant and some
denizens secretly want to be Sopranos. Chicago is in the midwest,
apparently in your mental concept of the "western frontier."

A BC-610 is a very old transmitter design, went obsolete many many
years ago in the military and everywhere else (except in memories
of olde-tyme hamme raddio types still glorying in long-past history
they were never a part of). Hallicrafters has been GONE for three
decades as a radio producer, and the name/logo has been GONE
for two decades. Hallicrafters is DEFUNCT in the quaint speech of
the raddio kops in this newsgroup.

Haven't you had enough? Are you incapable of being embarrassed?

It is GONE, DEFUNCT like the glorious memories of derring-do and
raddio pioneering of the heroic, stalwart, macho morsemen of olde.
You just continue to press on (weakly) in personal insults of others
not kissing your [expletive deleted] and brilliant technical intellects.
Such paints such a cozy picture of enthusing others to be just like
you and herr robust in U.S. hum raddio.

Sure Hallicrafters is as defunct as "Ham Radio" magazine. Many of us
enjoy indulging in nostalgia over our radio equipment and our past in
amateur radio. You'll have to actually pass some exams and obtain a
license before you can have a past in amateur radio.

Dave K8MN

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

Sure Hallicrafters is as defunct as "Ham Radio" magazine.

Poor baby. Still hurting because you never got an article accepted?

...or couldn't understand the technical content in any of its 22 year
independent publishing existance?

:-)

Many of us
enjoy indulging in nostalgia over our radio equipment and our past in
amateur radio.

You should. Not much future left for you...

You'll have to actually pass some exams and obtain a
license before you can have a past in amateur radio.

...and herr robust needs to actually pass a psychiatrist's tests to
rejoin the human race and have civil social intercourse with us.

So far you haven't passed those tests. Poor baby.

Now, you sit right down in front of your raddio and have an oriongasm
thinking that those without ham licenses would never understand it.
That seems to sooth your snarly nature.

Work some DX. But don't reveal that some of them are out-of-band
Frenchmen.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

Sure Hallicrafters is as defunct as "Ham Radio" magazine.

Poor baby. Still hurting because you never got an article accepted?

I'd have to have submitted one before it could be rejected, Leonard.
My stuff was published in Ham Radio Horizons and CQ.

...or couldn't understand the technical content in any of its 22 year
independent publishing existance?

I have almost all twenty-two years of independently published issues. I
have received any new ones for quite some time now.

:-)

Many of us
enjoy indulging in nostalgia over our radio equipment and our past in
amateur radio.

You should. Not much future left for you...

Here's a mirror, old top. I am a radio amateur and will be a radio
amateur. You've entered your eighth decade. You might want to
reconsider your statement in terms of statistical inevitability.

You'll have to actually pass some exams and obtain a
license before you can have a past in amateur radio.

...and herr robust needs to actually pass a psychiatrist's tests to
rejoin the human race and have civil social intercourse with us.

Us? The several of you dwelling within the tired body of Leonard H.
Anderson?

So far you haven't passed those tests. Poor baby.

So far, the unlicensed in medicine, unlicensed in amateur radio "Doctor
Len" is the only person who has seen a need for them. Poor baby.

Now, you sit right down in front of your raddio and have an oriongasm
thinking that those without ham licenses would never understand it.
That seems to sooth your snarly nature.

I'll sit in front of any of my radios and operate on any of the bands
and modes my license permits. You may do as you can.

Work some DX. But don't reveal that some of them are out-of-band
Frenchmen.

Why are you worried about whether Frenchmen are in or out of bands which
you can't access? French authorities (and Brian Burke) take care of
French ops. I'm only concerned with where I operate.

Dave K8MN