Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steveo wrote:
JJ wrote: Steveo wrote: JJ wrote: Steveo wrote: Another ham radio operator busted: March 3, 2004 Mr. Mark A. Glover 10632 Artcraft Avenue Garden Grove, CA 92640 Amateur Radio License KE6TTL: Warning Notice Dear Mr. Glover: In reference to your letter dated February 26, 2004, concerning the Catalina Amateur Repeater Association, enclosed is the letter sent to you requesting that you not use the repeater. Our letter of February 2, 2004, explained the right of the repeater association to make such a request. If there are any further questions, please feel free to contact us. If you have an objection to the decision of the repeater owner, you are free to pursue legal action locally. No Commission hearing procedures are provided in such matters. Enclosu 1 CC: FCC Western Regional Director Catalina Island Repeater Association Just how is this ham busted? Did he receive a NAL, get a fine, go to jail? No, the FCC just stated the problem is of repeater usage is between this amateur radio operator and the repeater owner. Some of you ham boys call an nal an automatic multi-thousand dollar fine, when you try your bull**** scare tactics in rec.radio.cb. Do you know the outcome of his nal, JJ? He did not get a NAL twit, he just got a letter from the FCC and it plainly stated that the problem was between the ham and the repeater owner. Here is the last sentence of the letter, get some six year old to explain it to you. "No Commission hearing procedures are provided in such matters." Heh, so unless you're busted and fined you haven't broken any rules. You running two meters now, dip****? Maybe if I type r e a l s l o w you might be able to understand. The ham in question did not break any FCC rules, he had a problem with the repeater owner who requested he not use the repeater anymore. The FCC in their letter to the ham plainly states the problem is between the ham and the repeater owner, there were no FCC rules broken. Again, the ham was not "busted" because he broke no FCC rules. Is that too hard for you to understand dipwad? It must be, evidently I am expecting too much of you as a cber to understand such a simple thing. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dealing with off topic | Antenna | |||
oxendine trouble with a capitol t | Policy |