LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old April 12th 04, 11:42 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Robert Casey
writes:

Mike Coslo wrote:

What do I desire as far as packet operations go?

One thing I used to desire was essentially usenews without the bad words
and spam. But 1200 baud just doesn't cut it anymore. Slower as there
is a lot of dead time.


"1200 baud" (actually 1200 bits per second) is about equivalent to
1200 words per minute as by:

1200 bps = 120 characters per second at 10 bits per character in
the ASCII 8-level character coding commonly used now.
120 characters per second = 7200 characters per minute.
If one "word" consists of 5 text characters plus a space character
(a common measure of throughput in telegraphy the century
before the last one), then 7200 char/min = 1200 words/min.

If the average "fast" radiotelegraphy rate is 20 words/minute,
then "1200 baud" is SIX HUNDRED TIMES FASTER than
average "CW."

Given the two vastly different communication rates, which one is
the "slow" one?

LHA / WMD
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj g3zhi Dx 0 December 4th 03 10:25 PM
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj g3zhi Dx 0 December 4th 03 10:25 PM
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj g3zhi Digital 0 December 4th 03 10:25 PM
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj g3zhi Digital 0 December 4th 03 10:25 PM
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj g3zhi General 0 December 4th 03 10:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017