Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Robert Casey
writes: Mike Coslo wrote: What do I desire as far as packet operations go? One thing I used to desire was essentially usenews without the bad words and spam. But 1200 baud just doesn't cut it anymore. Slower as there is a lot of dead time. "1200 baud" (actually 1200 bits per second) is about equivalent to 1200 words per minute as by: 1200 bps = 120 characters per second at 10 bits per character in the ASCII 8-level character coding commonly used now. 120 characters per second = 7200 characters per minute. If one "word" consists of 5 text characters plus a space character (a common measure of throughput in telegraphy the century before the last one), then 7200 char/min = 1200 words/min. If the average "fast" radiotelegraphy rate is 20 words/minute, then "1200 baud" is SIX HUNDRED TIMES FASTER than average "CW." Given the two vastly different communication rates, which one is the "slow" one? LHA / WMD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj | Dx | |||
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj | Dx | |||
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj | Digital | |||
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj | Digital | |||
22 echoirlp nodes installed by ian g0hlj | General |