![]() |
Alun wrote:
snippage The current kills you, but it takes volts to jump the gap, thousands of them. I have a little L-shaped scar on my right index finger from 10kV that I didn't touch. I'm an EE amongst other things, and I assume you are a physician?? If you say it doesn't matter which hand it is, then I beleive you, as it sounds like you know. I've never worked with power transmission or distribution, only with electronics, so that limits the current quite a bit (but not necessarily the volts)! IIRC, the accepted lower limit for electrocution is 24 volts. That is under some extraordinary conditions to be sure, but hey, don't misunderestimate (hehe) the ability of idiots! 8^) mebbe we better lower that 48 volt finals limit to 24 volts. And of course, even lesser voltages van do lots of damage, like 5 volt power supplies for large computers. Come into contact with one of them with your wedding ring on, and you'll have to find a new finger to wear it on. Oh... the new ring that is. These are the reasons that I really want to stress safety, as we remake the ARS. I'm capable of and willing to handle high voltages safely. If the tests are simplified badly, as it looks like will happen, there will be a new cadre of hams that may have little to no experience in these matters. Maybe the ARS is going to do their own version of Fear Factor..... - Mike KB3EIA - |
Subject: Are RF safety questions too hard for the proposed new Novice
exam? From: Alun Date: 4/19/2004 7:35 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: The current kills you, but it takes volts to jump the gap, thousands of them. I have a little L-shaped scar on my right index finger from 10kV that I didn't touch. I'm an EE amongst other things, and I assume you are a physician?? If you say it doesn't matter which hand it is, then I beleive you, as it sounds like you know. I've never worked with power transmission or distribution, only with electronics, so that limits the current quite a bit (but not necessarily the volts)! Nope...Not an M.D....An ER/Trauma Nurse with 15 years of EMS behind that. But it only took one electrocution to make me a believer. The one victim in particular was in a trench along a runway installing new lights...Somehow his feet came into contact with buried power lines that the work crew was unaware were there. Typical paddle application for defibrillation is to the left chest wall and upper midline sternum. The placement of the paddles in combination with the delivered current attempts to repolarize the the irratically firing SA node causing ventricular fibrillation. (That's the "HE'S IN VEE-FIB" you hear on countless episodes of "E.R." and "Third Watch".) Congrats on being an EE. Does it make you immune to electrocution? Does my NOT being an M.D. in any way diminish the fact that sufficient current sustained by adequate voltage can be fatal regardless of how or where it's applied to human tissue? 73 Steve, K4YZ |
On 20 Apr 2004 02:13:51 GMT, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
But it only took one electrocution to make me a believer. The one victim in particular was in a trench along a runway installing new lights...Somehow his feet came into contact with buried power lines that the work crew was unaware were there. Shudder.... My wife's present specialty is runway utility and lighting design for upgrades of major airports and conversions of military airfields to civilian use. Although she doesn't go onto the jobsite - that's done by electrical contractors on bid - she has mentioned many times that the "as-installed" drawings were missing or they were inaccurate. I'm thinking of two particular SAC bases (one is still active, the other is a conversion) that she's working on now which I had "intimate familiarity with" when I worked for SAC 40 years ago. Like "old home week"..... ggg -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
Subject: Are RF safety questions too hard for the proposed new Novice
exam? From: Alun Date: 4/19/2004 10:02 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Congrats on being an EE. Does it make you immune to electrocution? No Does my NOT being an M.D. in any way diminish the fact that sufficient current sustained by adequate voltage can be fatal regardless of how or where it's applied to human tissue? No Then why did you deem it important to raise either in the exchange? 73 Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in
: Subject: Are RF safety questions too hard for the proposed new Novice exam? From: Alun Date: 4/19/2004 10:02 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Congrats on being an EE. Does it make you immune to electrocution? No Does my NOT being an M.D. in any way diminish the fact that sufficient current sustained by adequate voltage can be fatal regardless of how or where it's applied to human tissue? No Then why did you deem it important to raise either in the exchange? 73 Steve, K4YZ To explain my background and find out if you had some kind of medical training, which you do |
Subject: Are RF safety questions too hard for the proposed new Novice
exam? From: Alun Date: 4/20/2004 8:58 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in : Then why did you deem it important to raise either in the exchange? To explain my background and find out if you had some kind of medical training, which you do OK. Thanks. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com