Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote And what makes you think that techs don't erect towers, Jim??? I don't think Jim said that Techs don't erect towers, but that he has a concern (which I share) that many amateurs (including you) support the ill-concieved proposal of ARRL which would extend a "free pass" to hundreds of thousands of licensees who have not demonstrated by examination that they are qualified for a license upgrade to General. The theory behind the exams is run a rough check on an individual's competence to operate therefore reducing perceived assorted problems on the bands. What's missing from the Tech written which would lead to problems on the low bands if they were simply grandfathered to HF as Generals? What problems? -or- What's the difference between Techs running 1.5 kW of ssb on 6M which they're allowed to do under the current regs and the same individuals running 1.5 kW of ssb on 20M which they're not allowed to do? Besides the positions of the station's bandswitches. 73, de Hans, K0HB w3rv |