| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
June 19th 04, 12:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: The Game's Afoot!
From: (Len Over 21) Date: 6/18/2004 2:48 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve da CAP Ace with too much carburetor heat) sputters and foams: "I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue". From the archived lies of Leonard H. Anderson. That was 29 years ago, senior. That was 13 years ago, senior. If you're going to parody Spanish, Lennie, you should at least spell it correctly. The DSN (Digital Switched Network) ...(SNIP) Even more completely unrealted, off topic trivia from one who must hide behind it. Try to get with the modern times. Reality is all around you. Yes, it is. Too bad you can't share in it, eh...?!?! I am well acquainted with life. Nop, you're not. You are well acquainted with your PERCEPTION of it from behind textbooks and CRTs. Reality exists beyond the tattered, dog-eared pages of old QST issues and ARRL handbooks. Yes, it does. I and others have pointed that out to you on numerous occassions and invited you to come out and try it. You've declined. Too much security in LennieLand. Fort Huachuca was okay in early spring but I've heard it is uncomfortable in mid-summer, being in Arizona. Glad I wasn't there in mid-summer. I HAVE been there in mid-summer...and late summer when it's actually worse. On several occassions. Sandia Laboratories is different. But, I can't talk much about that except that visit concerned things like SID. Ahhhhhhhhhh.......I see. Someone else suggests some "security" issues and you try to denigrate them for it. You think you're promoting your "insiderness" and you wave it like a flag. No, not "rife." :-) If you are trying a larger vocabulary, try to get something somewhat close to correct...and in context. Yes...rife was correct and in context. You are trying to "poison the well" by singling out only specific instances of what I've mentioned as to experiences and work over the last 51+ years. In other words, I hit the mark so close that you'll be dressing the wounds from the "collateral damage" for days. None of it has anything to do with Amateur Radio. Radio is radio, regardless of the differentiation that mere human regulation makers make of its differences. Only in your mind, Lennie. If that assertion was so true, you'd have no basis for your OTHER rants that insist that Amateurs must spend thier time learning about "other" radio services. If "Radio is radio", your other assertions are baseless. The Pacific Stars & Stripes did not include a nice photo I made of the MARS antenna newly installed at Hardy Barracks in 1955. And they didn't use the pictures I had of the Loch Ness monster either, Lennie. "Dictating" what you said? Absolutely. You are outraged that anyone dare confront your ideas and fantasies with actual, real-life experiences. The same with several others in here. Why is it that all those "others" are focused on YOU, Lennie? Perhaps YOU are the one with the perception problems? That's a rhetorical question, of course. With absolutely NO experience in Amateur Radio, we know you have no informed, valid expereicen from which to base your comments. The dictatorial attitude is fairly common, done with heckling and name-calling and general denigration in an effort to make a poster stop writing. Weak intimidation. Works sometimes, but is not a guarantee of suppressing truth and reality. And therein lies the bane of your existence... Still having a hard time wondering why your "superior intellect" can't squash all those "lesser beings" with your infinite wisdom..... Too bad you can't objectively review what you just wrote against your conduct over the last several years. No one in this forum has made any such assertion. Even those who staunchly support Morse Code testing have advocated advancement in the service. ...by more and more manual telegraphy use, praising its supposed qualities, and generally getting into silly stuff about how it's so much "better" than any other mode. Note use of the word "service" again. Hmmmmmm....The FCC uses it to describe Amateur Radio. The Commissioners are not licensed Amateurs...Lord knows none of them hold ANY form of licensure by the FCC. YOU frequently point out the Commissioners status. Are you NOW telling us that the language used by those very same Commissioners is WRONG...?!?! Military surrogate use. Desire to make amateur radio much more than it is by trying to identify a hobby with military service. That's YOUR schtick, Lennie. Tsk, tsk. Lost focus. Nope. Never have. I encourge you to provide even ONE quote that supports your assertion to the contrary.... Heh heh heh. No, "encourage" is the wrong word. You CHALLENGE. You DEMAND. It would be a "challenge" to you, Lennie...In as much as the quotes you need do not exist. You all but hop up and down in spiteful hollering to try to divert the discussion. Nope...It's right on. You make all sorts of assinine assertions about Amateur Radio in general and some Amateurs in particular, then can NEVER back up your assertions. You make assertions of fact. I want you to validate them. You never do. You CLAIM to be a "radio professional". You are not now nor ever were anything of the kind. I don't resent your alleged engineering career, Lennie. I know several electronics engineers, and they are fine fellows who make meaningful contributions. I'm sure you have "Jewish best friends," too. I don't have to make such claims, Lennie. You seem to make a lot of them, though. You are NOT a fine fellow, and there's more than a few indicators that your "contribution" to radio communications were limited to your few articles sold to Ham Radio magazine. (No doubt a last resort in "getting published" since I am sure the professional journals cut you off at the knees.) You can check out McGraw-Hill's old biweekly Electronics and Designer's Casebook. You can check out Microcomputing, a former monthly for personal computerists. You can check out BYTE magazine as well as BYTE Books on articles concerning circuit simulation. All reviewed and accepted by others. But not accepted as "PROFESSIONAL" publishing. If you tried to pass off "credentials" like some hobbyist periodicals as "profesional publishing", you'd be laughed out of the IEEE. You want to make a Big Thing about Ham Radio Magainze going "defunct" back in 1990...even though HR was considered a leader in U.S. ham periodicals for technical information...which it was. The "defunction" was due to a shrinking ham advertising market already begun by 1990. That shrinking is even affecting QST. It hit 73 Magazine big time. Unlike QST which can get support from the ARRL membership monies, HR and 73 were independent publications whose entire income was derived by advertising. CQ is the same way and is barely hanging on. The "shrinking ham advertising" was due to a lack of support of consumers. No consumers = no advertising monies = defunct. Corporate advertisers do not spend thier advertising monies where it is not netting a reasonable return. If "Ham Radio" had been the marvel of publishing accomplishment you'd care to have us beleive, it would still be actively published instead of being polished and repackaged as a CD novelty. "73" lost it's readership because Wayne Green is a senile idiot who ran it into the ground...not once, but twice. And how many "QRP" and "antenna specials" can one magazine run in a year...?!?! And those "editiorials"...?!?! Sheeeesh! Talk about being the poster boy for "Paranoia Today".... Even then I can't find a single example where any of your "work" was original, nor can I find any example of where your "contributions" were complimentary to the advancement of ANY radio communications discipline. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Having nursie as a critic is like having a blind color coordinator for interior decoration. :-) Try to differentiate between "compliment" and "complement." In either use of either word, there is no professional historical documentation that would indicate that Leonard H. Anderson did anything other than sweep floors in ANY "aerospace" installation or facility. And as far as your "contributions" to Amateur Radio via your HR pieces, I find no occassion where your work was footnooted, included or otherwise madse part-and-parcel of any other paper or work. And I did look. Closely. Poor nursie...never could take an opposite opinion to his in here and is bitterly resentful to anyone who had spoken out in opposition to him. I am only "bitterly resentful" of pathological liars and persons who proactively seek to cause What am I "seeking to cause?" Sentence unfinished. Yep...I changed a sentence prior to "sending" and clipped it. Here's the full sentence: "I am only 'bitterly resentful' of pathological liars who proactively seek to cause harm to Amateur Radio for no other purpsoe than to sate his own ego". What are "pathological liars," nursie? You are a pathological liar, Lennie. You can't tell or acknowledge the truth. Your lying is habitual. Even when you DO quote or recite factual information, who can trust you? Nursie no gots da edumcation in sykology, sointanly ain't gots no certificates (suitable for framing, hanging on da wall) as a licensed shrink. No licensure as a mental health worker, Lennie. True. However I DO have certifications in Emergency Nursing, in and among which is included managing psychiatric emergencies. Which is one more than YOU have. And it's too bad YOU don't avail yourself of the "hum radio magazines". (Your true colors are showing, Scumbag.) A long-time radio amateur used to say "hum radio." And you are not a "long time radio amateur". Never were, and God willing, never will be. I find it QUITE "enlightening" to keep an eye on you. Nursie is OBSESSED. Is COMPELLED to mean-mouth others who go against his opinions. Nope...not "mean-mouth". Expose. As if it took any effort to do... And if you didn't post such foolishness, I wouldn't have anything to work with. HARDLY "obsessed". And I am still waiting for you to post your credentials to tell us what qualified you to make determinations as to what is or isn't "good mental health". Leafing through wifey's correspondence courses doesn't qulify. Sicko words are sicko words to lay people, nursie. Well, Lennie, I am neither "lay people", nor am I the "sicko" that you insinuate. And still waiting on your psychiatry credentials. Steve, K4YZ |
Threaded Mode
