LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old July 12th 04, 07:38 AM
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ...
From: "D. Stussy"
Date: 7/10/2004 3:10 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
...
At least it is directly pertinent TO Amateur Radio, BY a licensed

Radio
Amateur IN an Amateur Radio forum.


But still a guidelines/charter violation nonetheless.


Bwaaaaaa.

Bwaaaaaa.

Bwaaaaaa.

99.99999 percent of the "stuff" that transpires in this NG is NOT related
to Amateur Radio, or is related only by virtue of the fact that the author is a
licensed Amateur.

YOUR only reason for fussing about this is that Bill Pasternak has hit
some sensitive chord with you, and you don't like it. Oh well...Take an
Excedrin.

I don't see you "protesting" any of the "ENLARGE YOUR !@#$%" spam, or the
"MAKE MONEY FAST" spam, nor do I see you protesting any of the "SEE MY TEEN
WIFE !@#$%^" spam.


Like ANYONE can do anything about the spam problem nowadays?....

NONE of that is even REMOTELY related to Amateur Radio, yet where's
Dieter's outrageous indignation about THOSE "guidelines/charter
violation(s)"...?!?!


SO? That just means that I chose to put my resources where I CAN accomplish an
end to the violation....

I reiterate my previous assertion: It's directly pertinent TO Amateur
Radio, BY a licensed Radio Amateur IN an Amateur Radio forum. Much of what is
in Bill's "news releases" IS pertinent to Amateur Radio policy
discussions....And certainly MORE pertinent than most of the other stuff that
transpires here.

All I can say is that what ever Bill did/said that got you in such a
wedgie must have hit pretty close to home! You're obviously still stinging
from it!


1) I have not made it any secret what he has done to one of my associates by
misreporting the story he was involved in. 2) If newsline is supposed to be a
"non-profit" operation then why is BP practically LIVING off of the donations?
There are laws that govern what "reasonable compensation" is for a non-profit,
and he's exceeding them, as I have previously demonstrated.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1418 ­ October 15, 2004 Radionews General 0 October 18th 04 04:48 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1380 – January 23, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 30th 04 09:55 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1380 – January 23, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 30th 04 09:55 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 Radionews General 0 July 19th 03 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017