|
|
Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ...
From: (William) Date: 8/30/2004 10:21 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I bet you've looked up more than one skirt in your life too, Dieter, but it doesn't make you a gynecologist, either. Steve -finally- recognizes genitalia other than "putz." "Putz", as your bunk buddy Lennie will attest, is NOT the proper name for genitalia of either gender. Details, Brain...Ya gotta work on getting the details right. So far, you're waaaaaaaay behind. Steve, K4YZ |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
"D. Stussy" wrote: On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Steve Robeson, K4CAP wrote: I bet you've looked up more than one skirt in your life too, Dieter, but it doesn't make you a gynecologist, either. We'll see what you "do" with it. First of all, I seriously doubt you "do" anything. And even if you do, I seriously doubt that anything will ever come of it. We'll see. Well, I will say this: No one here was able to provide anything that directly refuted my conclusion. It isn't a matter of "was able". It's more a matter of "doesn't care". So far, you're the only person remotely interested in your "conclusion". And yet we have all of these "unconcerned" parties commenting again and again and again. Good thing they aren't concerned. I don't know if we have the bandwidth, otherwise. Hi, hi. |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ... From: (William) Date: 8/30/2004 10:21 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I bet you've looked up more than one skirt in your life too, Dieter, but it doesn't make you a gynecologist, either. Steve -finally- recognizes genitalia other than "putz." "Putz", as your bunk buddy Lennie will attest, is NOT the proper name for genitalia of either gender. Proper or not, you're the one constantly using it. And Webster's defines it as "penis." Unless you're referring to guys wearing skirts. Oh, nevermind - don't want to go there with you! And then there's that reference to homosexuality again. The one that you claim not to make, and have never made. You sure are a nut. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I bet you've looked up more than one skirt in your life too, Dieter, but it doesn't make you a gynecologist, either. Steve -finally- recognizes genitalia other than "putz." Phew! I don't understand how he can recognize what he sees. To use his own "logic," a male gynecologist HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN BEING FEMALE TO UNDERSTAND THEM! :-) Post-op transgender? :-) |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I bet you've looked up more than one skirt in your life too, Dieter, but it doesn't make you a gynecologist, either. Steve -finally- recognizes genitalia other than "putz." Phew! I don't understand how he can recognize what he sees. To use his own "logic," a male gynecologist HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN BEING FEMALE TO UNDERSTAND THEM! :-) Post-op transgender? :-) "Sorry Hans, MALE IS FEMALE!" |
Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ...
From: (William) Date: 8/31/2004 6:02 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... To use his own "logic," a male gynecologist HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN BEING FEMALE TO UNDERSTAND THEM! :-) "Sorry Hans, MALE IS FEMALE!" The male gynecologist has something neither of you have...both theoretical education AND practical experience...in the healthcare profession they call it a "residency". Neither of you still not making any sense. Putzii. Steve, K4YZ |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ... From: (William) Date: 8/31/2004 6:02 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... To use his own "logic," a male gynecologist HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN BEING FEMALE TO UNDERSTAND THEM! :-) "Sorry Hans, MALE IS FEMALE!" The male gynecologist has something neither of you have...both theoretical education AND practical experience...in the healthcare profession they call it a "residency". A MALE GYNECOLOGIST HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AT BEING FEMALE. Is that true or not? If you argue that a Medical Doctorate makes a male a female, then you must be truly insane. Try to understand this: Medical doctoring has NOTHING to do with amateur radio or with Amateur Radio Newsline. YOU ARE NOT A MEDICAL DOCTOR. The general subject of RADIO does apply in this newsgroup since all radio operate by the same physical laws, regardless of the various adminstrations' law on use of radios. Neither of you still not making any sense. Nursie never has, it seems... |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Amateur Radio Newsline ... From: (William) Date: 8/31/2004 6:02 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... To use his own "logic," a male gynecologist HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN BEING FEMALE TO UNDERSTAND THEM! :-) "Sorry Hans, MALE IS FEMALE!" The male gynecologist has something neither of you have...both theoretical education AND practical experience...in the healthcare profession they call it a "residency". A MALE GYNECOLOGIST HAS NO PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE AT BEING FEMALE. Is that true or not? Quite true. But he STILL has PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE in dealing with female related health issues. If you argue that a Medical Doctorate makes a male a female, then you must be truly insane. A medical doctorate with a residency in gynecology makes him an OB/GYN. That's a doctor with PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE in such matters. Try to understand this: Medical doctoring has NOTHING to do with amateur radio or with Amateur Radio Newsline. YOU try to understand that your duties in the United States Army in 1953 have NOTHING to do with Amateur Radio, then, now or in the future. YOU try to understand that your experience in "professional" electronics, other than discussions of a purely theoretical technical nature, have NOTHING to do with Amateur Radio. YOU try to understand that your wife's alleged professional standing in the mental health industry does not qualify YOU as such, and in either case has nothing to do with Amatuer Radio. YOU try to understand that your brief fling as a student pilot in the 50's did not result in an Airman's Certificate, did not qualify you in aerial navigation, and in any case has nothing to do with Amateur Radio. YOU try to understand that your acquaintance with a "real extra" (who was nothing of the sort when you served in the Army with him the 50's) does not qualify you as "experienced" in Amateur Radio issues in the 21st century. YOU ARE NOT A MEDICAL DOCTOR. Nope. But Medical Doctors come to me to get the things done that save people's lives. Maybe even yours someday. The general subject of RADIO does apply in this newsgroup since all radio operate by the same physical laws, regardless of the various adminstrations' law on use of radios. This forum is not about the "physical laws" of radio. This forum is about Amateur Radio POLICY...The rules, regulations and programs of how Amateurs apply those physics. While I am sure that you are eminently able to discuss the laws of physics as they pertain to radio design, you are grossly ill-prepared to discuss, from an informed perspective (read that "no practical knowledge") matters pertaining to those policies. Your discussions herein solrely reflect your OPINION. Neither of you still not making any sense. Nursie never has, it seems... Obviously I have. You keep trying (unsucessfully) to unravel my posts. Sucks to be you. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com