On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Dave Heil wrote:

"D. Stussy" wrote:

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Lloyd wrote:

BULL****!

Then tell me why he won't come out here and set the record straight?

What would be his motivation to do so?


The truth is motivation enough.

You have the claims, you have to supply the evidence. Until then you
sound a littel like the people that claim alien abduction


He obviously knows about this newsgroup and reads it - and even posts at
least
once per week here.

He won't come out - because he knows that I'm correct.

At least that's your assumption.


He's done nothing to prove it incorrect.

In the alternative, let's assume that I am wrong: In that case, his news
gathering efforts are 900% more costly than that disclosed by his
"competitors"
(I only need to compare against one competitor to prove that), and as such,
people should then be supporting the more efficient services, not his. That
in
itself is reason enough to divert contributions elsewhere.

This is America, kind sir. If he makes money, and people are willing
to support him, then so be it. One of the things that makes our country great!

If he is making money on a regular basis, he should have his non-profit status
revoked. ...Or is that too hard a concept for you?

You will find that I'm
not the only person who has this opinion of him and his finances (but I
may be
the only one who has voiced it).

If no one else is voicing it, how do you know there are others who hold
your view? From the response to your diatribes here, most think the
matter is a non-issue. You can rage at the Sun; you can curse the moon.
Both are still here.


I know that there are others because I have spoken to them face-to-face
about
this precise topic, and they agreed with me. Except for one individual,
they
don't participate here.

So some people agree with you. Some people agree with Mr. Pasternak.
Null.