Menu

Jim = Quitefine?

Search this Thread

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

#20

Report Post

Old

September 20th 04, 06:54 AM

Quitefine

Posts: n/a

Default

In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Both are NOT INVOLVED!

We are involved, Len.
We are much more involved
than you are.

No ID, nothing.

Why is that a problem
for you?

Most of your postings
do not contain any 'ID'.

You have no problem
with the anonymous postings
of "Leo", nor the non-ID
postings of "billybeeper".

Why should we be treated
differently?

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

You have difficulty referring
to people by their names.
Why?

:-)

Not funny.

Reply With Quote

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ARS License Numbers	N2EY	Policy	833	February 3rd 06 01:27 AM
Ping Quitefine	Blackguard	Policy	26	September 9th 04 12:17 PM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal	Alun	Policy	104	August 26th 04 12:12 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 AM.

About Us

"It's about Radio"

Contact Us RadioBanter forum home Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2017