Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ???
From: (Brian Kelly) Date: 9/28/2004 11:15 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian the Bluffman's Home Companion Kelly) writes: My FT-847, which is not much as ham xcvrs go, can be tuned in 1 Hz increments vs. the "make it possible for anyone to select 10 Hz increments" thingey you cite above. 10 Hz increments is common in installed equipment (including the ham consumer market) in the past two decades. I know there are smaller increments...:-)...but I also have to play to the common denominator of technical expertise in here. I see. You have some sort of "moral responsibility" to keep us "technically clueless" types straight do you Sweetums? I don't think so. More like the technical groups don't put up with your nonsense (ref: your dot antennas debacle) and you're outta aces and have no choice but to lounge around in a lame hobby policy group. Even pore Weenie Weenie Willy Beeper has a ham license. And you don't. Methinks you *define* the lowest common denominator around here Sweetums. He is. I bet that once removed from his computer, Lennie's "knowledge" about many things "radio" would roll off sharply. That's probably why he can't/won't go sit the VE session...Can't take his "brain" with him... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy |