| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
September 30th 04, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Avery Fineman wrote:
In article , (N2EY) writes: Dave Heil wrote in message ... What amateur radio equipment has Len developed? What amateur radio equipment has Len actually used, and in what environments? (The contest environment is quite different from the "quiet band" environment) How many contest points/countries/states/contacts has Len made with amateur radio equipment he developed/designed/built/paid for himself? What articles on amateur radio receiver performance issues such as dynamic range (third order IMD, BDR, etc.), phase noise, etc., has he authored? Or even actually read and understood? The world wonders....;-) "The world" isn't "wondering" at all. Neither Jimmie nor Davie have developed any marketable ham transceivers. No, I've developed the same number of marketable ham transceivers you have, Leonard--none. Then again, I was aware of the synthesizer phase noise and spurs. You weren't. You attempted to spoon feed us crap. What minor phrases? Len claimed that frequency synthesizer rigs were necessary for the "subdivisions" of 1968. Tsk. I didn't refer to 1968 per se. Weren't you the guy who wrote something of nit-picking? When did you think those subbands came into existence? Numerous positngs by different authors, all of whom actually had to deal with those "subdivisions" have proved that to be utterly false and without basis. "Authors?" Who in here, besides myself, can claim many bylines and a staff position at a ham magazine? Not Jimmie. Not Davie. Authors. You know, who writes something. I've had a number of bylines in amateur radio magazines. Be careful, you'll end up looking like Brian Burke in his A-1 Op Club gaffe. Len, of course, never had to deal with them at all because he's never been a radio amateur and never operated an amateur radio station. (By FCC definition, operating requires a license). Pity that. All that while as a professional and never becoming a licensed amateur! Horrors! Do us a favor and note that this newsgroup is rec.radio.amateur.policy. I'm not impressed with your frequent touting of your past professional status. Many radio amateurs are current or past professionals in communications or electronics. Tooting your horn about your past work and attempting to use it as a substitute for an amateur license in an amateur radio newsgroup isn't likely to win you any points among hams. Of course, to the knowledgeable reader, Len's postings simply reveal how truly ignorant he is of amateur radio in many ways. That's not a crime, of course, but it does get boring. Poor baby. Bored are you? Tsk, tsk. Jimmie needs a hobby activity or to get out and see more things. Oh! Didn't you know? Jim's a licensed amateur radio operator. Maybe you could take up amateur radio. Jimmie ought to understand that radio amateurs didn't invent radio nor did they develop all the circuits and systems in modern ready- built radios. Tsk. I'm guessing that Jim and everyone else here was already aware of that factoid. Jim likely realizes that you didn't invent radio or all of the circuits and systems in modern ready-built radios. That makes you even. Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
