Designed And Built By PROFESSIONALS....
 

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Best guess at the moment is to call him , I guess.

".org" NOT ".net" :-)

IEEE is a professional association, thus qualifying for the ".org"

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Best guess at the moment is to call him , I guess.

".org" NOT ".net" :-)

IEEE is a professional association, thus qualifying for the ".org"



The ARRL, not a professional association. Its web url is www.arrl.org.
How ever did they manage to "qualify"?

See ya, org.

Dave K8MN

In article . net, robert casey
writes:

Best guess at the moment is to call him , I guess.


".org" NOT ".net" :-)

IEEE is a professional association, thus qualifying for the ".org"



Seems that it should be for association, but
somehow something else comes to mind.... ;-)

Tsk. You guys are sure anal-retentive... :-)

Len

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Brian Kelly wrote:

snip

All very nice and entertaining for you few, but NOTHING in regards
to amateur radio and certainly NOT about policy thereto.

The "architectural digest" forum is up on the 3rd floor to the right.

When you've all had some experience building high-rises, come
on back and TRY to stay somewhere in the vicinity of RADIO.

Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



Brian Kelly wrote:


snip

All very nice and entertaining for you few, but NOTHING in regards
to amateur radio and certainly NOT about policy thereto.

Oh dear. If my posts bother you, you *can* filter me out. 8^)


The "architectural digest" forum is up on the 3rd floor to the right.

I'm cool with talking to Jim and Brian and the others here. Thanks for
letting me know though. Join in and participate if you like. Your
opinions are welcome.

When you've all had some experience building high-rises, come
on back and TRY to stay somewhere in the vicinity of RADIO.


Thanks for the invitation to leave, but I think most of us in this
thread are enjoying ourselves. So I'll just hang out and continue.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



N2EY wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



Brian Kelly wrote:


snip

All very nice and entertaining for you few, but NOTHING in regards
to amateur radio and certainly NOT about policy thereto.

Oh dear. If my posts bother you, you *can* filter me out. 8^)

Carbonate charcoal doesn't work. Maybe UV and reverse osmosis.

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



N2EY wrote:



In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



N2EY wrote:



In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



N2EY wrote:



In article , Mike Coslo
writes:



Brian Kelly wrote:


snip

All very nice and entertaining for you few, but NOTHING in regards
to amateur radio and certainly NOT about policy thereto.

Oh dear. If my posts bother you, you *can* filter me out. 8^)


Carbonate charcoal doesn't work. Maybe UV and reverse osmosis.

No, all you have to do is go to the message filters of your newsreader.

- Mike KB3EIA -