Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com, "K4YZ"
writes: Tsk. You mean like "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" I got it backwards...my bad. You don't have it backwards, forwards, or sideways. You just don't have it. Sure I do. I have an Amateur Radio Extra Class license...You don't. You profess to know about Amateur Radio, yet have no practical experience in it. Len also has no experience in radio regulation, yet professes to tell all what the regulations for the Amateur Radio Service should be. Everyone is allowed to have an opinion, of course. But there's a big difference between an opinion and an informed opinion... I have an FAA Airman's Certificate and have currency in 3 types. You have NO certificate of any type and no time in anything with wings except as a paying passenger. Correct me if I'm mistaken, Steve - but doesn't that sort of certification require a certain number of hours in order to renew? I have multiple licenses as a healthcare provider. Again correct me if I'm mistaken, Steve - but doesn't that sort of licensing require a certain number of continuing education credits in order to renew? IOW, it's not just what you know - it's also about what you continue to learn. You've never acknowledged that the University of Illinois is NOT a correspondence school. The University of Illinois does have extension courses. You've never acknowledged anything close to working military communications in a long service with the U.S. military. You've never acknowledged any working knowledge of common small- unit military radios in use during that U.S. military service. Sure I have. Again, YOU ignore it. And YOU did not have but 3 years of "service with the U. S. Military). I beat that many times over. More to the point: Of what importance is that knowledge in amateur radio policy? You've never acknowledged any working knowledge of Yiddish yet you freely use at least one Yiddish pejorative in many public postings. Nor do I have a "working knowledge" of Japanese, Serbo-Coratian, or Tagalog, yet I can speak enough words of each to ask for help, find a cop and get drunk. I can speak conversationalist German and Spanish. Dang, that's more languages than I know at that level. You speak...What...??? Please tell us just how competent YOU are in Yiddish. (use of a search engine notwithstanding). You've never acknowledged the real reason for your very short "career in electronics engineering" as a purchasing agent for a set-top-box maker that lasted less than half a year. I never said I was an engineer. And you still don't have the facts of my employment there correct. What does it matter? If someone disagrees with Len, there's no possible employment or education they could have that Len would find significant, except to make fun of it. Look at K8MN's resume - then see how Len treats him. I stated several times over my reason for leaving nursing for a while in 2000. Everyone else that's been in here any length of time knows...except you...why is that? And I was there much longer that the "less than half a year" you keep falsely reitrating. Also, I did not work for a "set top box maker". The company I DID work for occupied the opposite end of a building from that company (ANTEC). We rented space on their servers. You've also been told that over and over yet keep trying to make an issue out of it. See above. You've never acknowledged that the U.S. military did NOT make you any sort of pilot of any military aircraft despite implying that you were licensed as a private pilot before entering the military. I never said I was a military aviator. You are welcomed to try and find ANY quote ANYwhere that says otherwise. And I WAS licensed before I went on active duty. My initial Airman's certificate was signed in August 1974. I went on active duty in September 1974. Please don't confuse Len with facts...;-) Again, facts you've been provided with over and over, but seem to want to lie about over and over. You've never acknowledged many, many mistakes you've made in here, constantly over several years. Nor does Len. Shall we discuss 97.21(b)? That's an amateur radio issue. Unlike you, Lennie, I don't keep making the same mistakes over and over. You've never acknowledged any knowledge of radio-electronics circuitry behind the front panels of amateur radios, yet you claim to be knowledgeable about "radio." I AM knowledgeable about "radio". Do I have a doctorate level degree in engineering...??? Of course not. But then I don't need it, either. I've built radios from scratch and from kits...I was paid by Uncle Sam for 2 decades to maintain aircraft (and some ground) radios. I am the owner/operator of a federally licensed radio station. Besides, no matter what knowledge you claim, Len would make fun of it. Remember when I was challenged about my knowledge of the Smith chart, and I wrote some sample problems and their solutions? Didn't make any difference to Len. As to the alleged claim about LIQUID methane in my personal environment, that is quite wrong. The liquid form of methane can only exist at temperatures rather well below the coldest found on Earth. The "critic" seems familiar only with the GASEOUS form of methane. [may the aldehydes be with him...] To use a colloquial term, that critic is "a gas." Peee-uuuu. Oh, I KNOW what temperatures methane liquifies at. Then write it. Demonstrate that methane can exist in liquid form anywhere on the Earth's surface. And I know what a cold piece of work you are. 98.6 F average. Not in your heart. And my reversal of the probes names notwithstanding, you're STILL a putz, Lennie... You were going good there, Steve, but then you had to toss in that word... Tsk, tsk, tsk. Calling others the equivalent of "penis head" is not considered "civil" and that is certainly not "reasonable discourse." We've seen the results of YOUR "civil discourse", Lennie. Let's see - "shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel" - that's a Lenism. How about "Nazi" and "jackbooted thug"? Lenisms too. I may be crude and unrelenting in my exchanges with you, but I am not a liar, and at the end of the day, it's all about character. Or you could say you were just pulling Len's leg. That's what he says.... Just don't take him so seriously. Nobody else does. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N2EY wrote: In article .com, "K4YZ" writes: Tsk. You mean like "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" I got it backwards...my bad. You don't have it backwards, forwards, or sideways. You just don't have it. Sure I do. I have an Amateur Radio Extra Class license...You don't. You profess to know about Amateur Radio, yet have no practical experience in it. Len also has no experience in radio regulation, yet professes to tell all what the regulations for the Amateur Radio Service should be. But of course...He's a "professional"...! Everyone is allowed to have an opinion, of course. But there's a big difference between an opinion and an informed opinion... Ahhhhh, yes. Unfortuntely that's the part our resident "professional" forgets! I have an FAA Airman's Certificate and have currency in 3 types. You have NO certificate of any type and no time in anything with wings except as a paying passenger. Correct me if I'm mistaken, Steve - but doesn't that sort of certification require a certain number of hours in order to renew? Ummmm....I am not sure what you mean by "renew". An Airman's certificate is a lifetime grant. The Flight Medical has to be renewed, and it's duration depends on the class of medical and the privileges being exercised. You are required to fly a Biennial Flight Review once every 24 months for the PPL. As for my flight currency, the FAA only requires that I have three take-offs and three landings to a full stop before carrying passengers (other than the aforementioned flight check) CAP's regulations are a bit stiffer. CAP requires the FAA standards plus a "Form 5" ride every year in each category. (I can take a checkride in the Cessna 182 and it's also good for the smaller 172) Plus I have to complete the written exam on model I fly yearly. Then if I fly as a Mission Pilot, there are additional requirements, both in the air and administratively. I do not currently fly as a Mission Pilot. I have multiple licenses as a healthcare provider. Again correct me if I'm mistaken, Steve - but doesn't that sort of licensing require a certain number of continuing education credits in order to renew? Yu-hup. IOW, it's not just what you know - it's also about what you continue to learn. Yu-hup. And then there's my BCLS, ACLS, EMS-C, PALS, and other certifications. All typically require 2 year recertifications. All are required for me to function as an ER/Trauma Nurse. You've never acknowledged that the University of Illinois is NOT a correspondence school. The University of Illinois does have extension courses. You've never acknowledged anything close to working military communications in a long service with the U.S. military. You've never acknowledged any working knowledge of common small- unit military radios in use during that U.S. military service. Sure I have. Again, YOU ignore it. And YOU did not have but 3 years of "service with the U. S. Military). I beat that many times over. More to the point: Of what importance is that knowledge in amateur radio policy? None to policy. However I was a radio OPERATOR in the Marine Corps (in addition to being a repairman.) More accurately I was the CHOP for a gateway station and theater net control while on Okinawa. You've never acknowledged any working knowledge of Yiddish yet you freely use at least one Yiddish pejorative in many public postings. Nor do I have a "working knowledge" of Japanese, Serbo-Coratian, or Tagalog, yet I can speak enough words of each to ask for help, find a cop and get drunk. I can speak conversationalist German and Spanish. Dang, that's more languages than I know at that level. I KNOW Spanish and German (conversational...I'd hate to get drawn into some "meaningful" conversation!). The other three, as I said, were just a few words! I am sure Lennie's "mastery" of "Yiddish" ends with the clicking of a mouse and use of a search engine. You speak...What...??? Please tell us just how competent YOU are in Yiddish. (use of a search engine notwithstanding). You've never acknowledged the real reason for your very short "career in electronics engineering" as a purchasing agent for a set-top-box maker that lasted less than half a year. I never said I was an engineer. And you still don't have the facts of my employment there correct. What does it matter? If someone disagrees with Len, there's no possible employment or education they could have that Len would find significant, except to make fun of it. Look at K8MN's resume - then see how Len treats him. Ironic then that when Lennie provided HIS resume all it did was give me a place to start in on him. Dumb thing to do when you have "history" that shouldn't see the light of day! I stated several times over my reason for leaving nursing for a while in 2000. Everyone else that's been in here any length of time knows...except you...why is that? And I was there much longer that the "less than half a year" you keep falsely reitrating. Also, I did not work for a "set top box maker". The company I DID work for occupied the opposite end of a building from that company (ANTEC). We rented space on their servers. You've also been told that over and over yet keep trying to make an issue out of it. See above. I know, Jim. I guess it's easier to understand why it took Lennie 14 years to complete a "degree"...Poor fella can't remember squat any longer than his last nap. You've never acknowledged that the U.S. military did NOT make you any sort of pilot of any military aircraft despite implying that you were licensed as a private pilot before entering the military. I never said I was a military aviator. You are welcomed to try and find ANY quote ANYwhere that says otherwise. And I WAS licensed before I went on active duty. My initial Airman's certificate was signed in August 1974. I went on active duty in September 1974. Please don't confuse Len with facts...;-) Where in the world did he pull that gem from, Jim...? Have I EVER said ANYthing that even remotely sounded like "I was a military aviator"...?!? I believe I have been very careful to clearly make that distinction. Again, facts you've been provided with over and over, but seem to want to lie about over and over. You've never acknowledged many, many mistakes you've made in here, constantly over several years. Nor does Len. Shall we discuss 97.21(b)? That's an amateur radio issue. And with as many times as he's poured through Part 97 trying to find some "point" to try and MAKE a point of, you'd think he at least would have remembered having seen it "somewhere". I guess not. If he'd get over his ARRL phobia and watched the homepage on occassion, he'd also see lots of letters from Riley % Company under "Enforcement Letters" on the very same subject. Unlike you, Lennie, I don't keep making the same mistakes over and over. You've never acknowledged any knowledge of radio-electronics circuitry behind the front panels of amateur radios, yet you claim to be knowledgeable about "radio." I AM knowledgeable about "radio". Do I have a doctorate level degree in engineering...??? Of course not. But then I don't need it, either. I've built radios from scratch and from kits...I was paid by Uncle Sam for 2 decades to maintain aircraft (and some ground) radios. I am the owner/operator of a federally licensed radio station. Besides, no matter what knowledge you claim, Len would make fun of it. He can make fun of the time of day, if he cares to...the FACTS remain that Lennie has NONE of the qualifications in any of those disciplines in which he insinuates he does. Remember when I was challenged about my knowledge of the Smith chart, and I wrote some sample problems and their solutions? Didn't make any difference to Len. Nope. Early on in our exchanges Lennie made a point of bragging about how he and his colleagues could offer so much to Amateur Radio. OK...I suggested he start a discussion on microwave technology. Of course he THEN started in on how he wasn't going to do for FREE what he normally "get's paid" for. I think he made his ulterior motives clear then. As to the alleged claim about LIQUID methane in my personal environment, that is quite wrong. The liquid form of methane can only exist at temperatures rather well below the coldest found on Earth. The "critic" seems familiar only with the GASEOUS form of methane. [may the aldehydes be with him...] To use a colloquial term, that critic is "a gas." Peee-uuuu. Oh, I KNOW what temperatures methane liquifies at. Then write it. Demonstrate that methane can exist in liquid form anywhere on the Earth's surface. And I know what a cold piece of work you are. 98.6 F average. Not in your heart. And my reversal of the probes names notwithstanding, you're STILL a putz, Lennie... You were going good there, Steve, but then you had to toss in that word... Yeah...I know...I'm a human and subject to human frailties like everyone else. Well....Like everyone EXCEPT Lennie! Sorry. My bad. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Calling others the equivalent of "penis head" is not considered "civil" and that is certainly not "reasonable discourse." We've seen the results of YOUR "civil discourse", Lennie. Let's see - "shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel" - that's a Lenism. How about "Nazi" and "jackbooted thug"? Lenisms too. The Nazi epithets started in on well before I dropped any pretense of further civility with His Putziness...(ooops...did it again...) I may be crude and unrelenting in my exchanges with you, but I am not a liar, and at the end of the day, it's all about character. Or you could say you were just pulling Len's leg. That's what he says.... Oh! Yeah! That's the ticket! Just don't take him so seriously. Nobody else does. I just want to make sure it stays that way. In the 1700's and 1800's people used to tell tales that African natives grew tails in the full moon light and danced in reverence to Satan. Nothing was further from the truth, however "authoritive sounding" persons kept promoting it as "truth". Otherwise naieve or ignorant persons just assumed it was true. Lennie can sound very convincing. Very little of it is truthful, but just enough of it is, and that's the hook. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Cassini Probe and Lennie Anderson | Policy |