|
Len's terms of endearment list
In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the
cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Avenging Angle Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - |
Mike Coslo wrote: In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Avenging Angle Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, "Avenging Angel" is mine. bb |
bb wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote: In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Strike for inaccurate attribute Avenging Angle back to list Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, "Avenging Angel" is mine. bb Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. |
Mike Coslo wrote: bb wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Strike for inaccurate attribute Avenging Angle back to list Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, "Avenging Angel" is mine. bb Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". And you forgot "Brownshirts", "Elitists", "Dr Strangelove" and "Jimmie". Oh...and let's not forget "Coslonaut". If Lennie were to spend as much time on Amateur Radio as he does dissing Radio Amateurs, he'd get the recognition he THINKS he deserves now...But, we all know THAT won't happen...! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: bb wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Strike for inaccurate attribute Avenging Angle back to list Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, "Avenging Angel" is mine. bb Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. Brian, I know that for what ever reason...maybe it's just to root for the underdog, you've "sided" with Lennie. But myself and a dozen other people have been TRYING to tell you that Lennie is all-about making OTHER people's work HIS own...That's partly why Lennie was disinvited from working in Pennsylvania, and partly why you won't find his name as "author" in any professional "radio" journals...At least not since 1980. Lennie can rant and rave about "PCTA Extras" or "Mighty Morsemen" all he wants, but his circumstances are his OWN doing, and part of that "doing" was trying to get by on the works of others. And that now includes you. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote: bb wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he Nun of the Above Rev. Jim Gunnery Nurse Nursie Robust Oberst Nazi Strike for inaccurate attribute Avenging Angle back to list Poop Dave Some kind of Humorless Ham full of Angries the paragon of Truth and Virtue, he say Herr Kommandant James Psychochief Miccolis Kommandant uf das Neugruppen Waffe Herr Gruppekommandant Mr. Petty Chief Ossifer das gruppenfuhrer da Katapult King La Cucaracha Herr Gasbag hockey puck fifth wheel on the four morsemen of the apocalypse - Mike KB3EIA - Mike, "Avenging Angel" is mine. bb Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". And you forgot "Brownshirts", "Elitists", "Dr Strangelove" and "Jimmie". Oh...and let's not forget "Coslonaut". If Lennie were to spend as much time on Amateur Radio as he does dissing Radio Amateurs, he'd get the recognition he THINKS he deserves now...But, we all know THAT won't happen...! Doesn't appear to like too many Hams, does he? - Mikie KB3EIA - |
Len Anderson wrote: Brian, those tongue-in-cheek satiric appelations were justly earned by all parties. No one in this group "earned" being insulted by a pathological liar like you, Lennie. Rest of self-appreciating anti-Amateur Radio hatred snipped. - 30 - Cute, Lennie, but it still doesn't amke you an "author". Thanks |
Mike Coslo wrote: If Lennie were to spend as much time on Amateur Radio as he does dissing Radio Amateurs, he'd get the recognition he THINKS he deserves now...But, we all know THAT won't happen...! Doesn't appear to like too many Hams, does he? If you'll check out his latest rant in this thread, you'll see that Lennie doesn't like much of anyone. He has something ugly to say about each of us... He comes into an Amateur Radio forum, is ugly to and dishonest in his representations of Amateurs, then wonders why no one wants to be his pal. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Mike Coslo wrote: If Lennie were to spend as much time on Amateur Radio as he does dissing Radio Amateurs, he'd get the recognition he THINKS he deserves now...But, we all know THAT won't happen...! Doesn't appear to like too many Hams, does he? If you'll check out his latest rant in this thread, you'll see that Lennie doesn't like much of anyone. He has something ugly to say about each of us... He comes into an Amateur Radio forum, is ugly to and dishonest in his representations of Amateurs, then wonders why no one wants to be his pal. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Mike Coslo wrote: If Lennie were to spend as much time on Amateur Radio as he does dissing Radio Amateurs, he'd get the recognition he THINKS he deserves now...But, we all know THAT won't happen...! Doesn't appear to like too many Hams, does he? If you'll check out his latest rant in this thread, you'll see that Lennie doesn't like much of anyone. He has something ugly to say about each of us... He comes into an Amateur Radio forum, is ugly to and dishonest in his representations of Amateurs, then wonders why no one wants to be his pal. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. Brian, I know that for what ever reason...maybe it's just to root for the underdog, you've "sided" with Lennie. But myself and a dozen other people have been TRYING to tell you that Lennie is all-about making OTHER people's work HIS own...That's partly why Lennie was disinvited from working in Pennsylvania, and partly why you won't find his name as "author" in any professional "radio" journals...At least not since 1980. Lennie can rant and rave about "PCTA Extras" or "Mighty Morsemen" all he wants, but his circumstances are his OWN doing, and part of that "doing" was trying to get by on the works of others. And that now includes you. 73 Steve, K4YZ But, but, but... I've never written for a professional radio journal, so Len can hardly ride my coattails. |
"Mike Coslo" wrote in part ... "In another post, I went back through a few weeks messages to find the cute little nicknames that LenOver21 makes up for people. I was pretty impressed with the volume, but I know I didn't get them all. I came up with 21 nicknames. In the interest of not leaving anyone out who may have received one of his monikers, let's add to the list he" _________________________________________________ Hey Mike, Lenwayoverthehill21 used to call me all sorts of things from brownshirt to Herr Inspector. Rather humorous, really. I think he blocked me, but just in case he is "listening", I was just promoted again. And yes, I just love my blackberry :-)) KT4ST |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. Brian, I know that for what ever reason...maybe it's just to root for the underdog, you've "sided" with Lennie. But myself and a dozen other people have been TRYING to tell you that Lennie is all-about making OTHER people's work HIS own...That's partly why Lennie was disinvited from working in Pennsylvania, and partly why you won't find his name as "author" in any professional "radio" journals...At least not since 1980. Lennie can rant and rave about "PCTA Extras" or "Mighty Morsemen" all he wants, but his circumstances are his OWN doing, and part of that "doing" was trying to get by on the works of others. And that now includes you. 73 Steve, K4YZ But, but, but... I've never written for a professional radio journal, so Len can hardly ride my coattails. Let's repeat the paragraph in question, Brian, and then YOU can tell ME what YOUR lack of being published in ANY forum has to do with it... QUOTE: But myself and a dozen other people have been TRYING to tell you that Lennie is all-about making OTHER people's work HIS own...That's partly why Lennie was disinvited from working in Pennsylvania, and partly why you won't find his name as "author" in any professional "radio" journals...At least not since 1980. UNQUOTE The statement said that Lennie has a history of taking other people's work. He proved it in his warping of your "endearment". He didn't even give you, his one and only NG "buddy", credit for the work. So....What does YOUR lack of publishing credits have to do with Lennie's irresponsible and unprofessional behaviour. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Len Anderson wrote:
In article .com, "bb" writes: Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. Brian, those tongue-in-cheek satiric appelations were justly earned by all parties. :-) ....by the official arbiter of such things--Leonard H. Anderson, a non-radio amateur. Actually, "Avenging Angle" applies to nearly all PCTA extras. Actually, it doesn't. All are self-righeously Right even if they aren't in a triangle of being oh-so-superior to NCTAs. Actually, they aren't. I'm sure it seems that way to an outsider with an ax to grind. All who don't worship at the Church of St. Hiram are, to them, heretics and infidels, unworthy of surviving on the same planet as the PCTA. They are all Right Angles but perpendicular to the plane of existance of reality of today. Actually, there is no "Church of St. Hiram". You may continue to live on the planet but you aren't involved in amateur radio. Much earlier in here I'd made mention of one Elfren Saldivar (hope name is correct), the "Angle of Death" at Glendale Memorial Hospital in this area. He was a nurse who offed a bunch of elderly patients "to ease their suffering." Lots of them. Registered nurse with certificates and everything... Sound familiar? :-) No, it doesn't sound familiar to anyone here. We don't have a nurse who has killed any patients. So...we've got the "forever marine" spending the weekend shouting epithets using pejoratives not in his ethnic experience, always being the "avenger" for the "service." "We've got"? Do you have a Vibroplex in your pocket? We've got the prissy never- served busy acting like Nun of the Above, rapping the knuckles of any who don't agree with him (or her). Shouldn't that be "message knuckles"? We've got the "forever ham" of four decades hamming it up into great "superiority" but who never learned a thing about diplomacy in the State Department "foreign service." I've not been a ham forever. I've been a ham for over four decades and I'm not quite 56. If I'd been a ham for two days, I'd be your superior in amateur radio. You aren't a radio amateur. I learned plenty about diplomacy in the Foreign Service, not "foreign service" though that was not my area of expertise. Nothing compels me to suffer rude churls. Finally, it is not the "State Department 'foreign service'" but the Foreign Service of the United States. Don't you get anything right? We've got the "university lecturer" who survives the terrible storms that regularly destroy everything in Hawaii except the ham rigs and assists other hams in regards to USPS addresses. Why is "university lecturer" in quotes, Leonard? Are you being forced by your nature to live up to the N2EY profile? We have the coslonaut who wanted hearty congratulations for a feat he hasn't yet begun but was upset when he didn't get it. Aren't you stretching the truth more than a little? Weren't you, in fact, one who told him that his proposed feat couldn't be done? Didn't you launch into a lengthy diatribe only to have to eat your words when evidence was presented which contradicted your claims? A nice jolly group of down-lookers in their own PCTA "blog" happily giving each other high-fives for being so intrinisically superior to all others. This isn't a blog, Leonard and no one here has suggested that he is superior to all others. The major "superiority" attribute is cussing out "civilians" not possessing the right ham hobby papers to show to their raddio kopp schutzstaffel. It isn't that you don't have the right papers, Len. It is that you have no credentials in amateur radio. You aren't a part of amateur radio. You play no role in amateur radio. You aren't involved in amateur radio. Oh yeah, Godwin invoked. They can flog each other in this blog for all I care. [some do] This isn't a blog and you must certainly care. You've shown up here for a long, long time. All their little names are familiar to all who look into this blog. This isn't a blog and you've generated more "little names" than everyone else here combined. [it long since dropped out as a discussion place, became a chat room reserved for their highnesses, a group blog] They've worked hard at earning all those names and should be proud of them. :-) This isn't a chat room and it isn't a blog. :-) Godwin's observation as the catalyst of their being compared to the national socialist party of 1930s Germany applies in the truest form. They gas back and forth so much in the group blog that they need their own chambers. [again deserved by them] Well, there you have it. As to amateur radio policy, only the newsgroup name has any relevation to "ham radio." They ham it up, not on radio, not on any "airwaves," only on computers, saved from direct physical harm through time and distance by insulting all who don't agree with them. Hear them roar! :-) Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. The rest of us may discuss anything on the amateur bands. You may not. By the way, did you mean that if we were in the room with you, we'd be in danger of direct physical harm? Did you plan to bore us to death? Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote:
Len Anderson wrote: In article .com, "bb" writes: Oops, sorry about that Brian. I suspect there will be a few missed attributes in the list. Actually, Mike, you were correct...So was Brian...Brian uses the "Avenging Angel", however Lennie twists an already dumb idea into the more dumberest "Angle". Oh, I missed that. Looks like he he's added a new twist and made it his own. Probably patentable. Awesome. Brian, those tongue-in-cheek satiric appelations were justly earned by all parties. :-) ...by the official arbiter of such things--Leonard H. Anderson, a non-radio amateur. Actually, "Avenging Angle" applies to nearly all PCTA extras. Actually, it doesn't. All are self-righeously Right even if they aren't in a triangle of being oh-so-superior to NCTAs. Actually, they aren't. I'm sure it seems that way to an outsider with an ax to grind. All who don't worship at the Church of St. Hiram are, to them, heretics and infidels, unworthy of surviving on the same planet as the PCTA. They are all Right Angles but perpendicular to the plane of existance of reality of today. Actually, there is no "Church of St. Hiram". You may continue to live on the planet but you aren't involved in amateur radio. Much earlier in here I'd made mention of one Elfren Saldivar (hope name is correct), the "Angle of Death" at Glendale Memorial Hospital in this area. He was a nurse who offed a bunch of elderly patients "to ease their suffering." Lots of them. Registered nurse with certificates and everything... Sound familiar? :-) No, it doesn't sound familiar to anyone here. We don't have a nurse who has killed any patients. So...we've got the "forever marine" spending the weekend shouting epithets using pejoratives not in his ethnic experience, always being the "avenger" for the "service." "We've got"? Do you have a Vibroplex in your pocket? We've got the prissy never- served busy acting like Nun of the Above, rapping the knuckles of any who don't agree with him (or her). Shouldn't that be "message knuckles"? We've got the "forever ham" of four decades hamming it up into great "superiority" but who never learned a thing about diplomacy in the State Department "foreign service." I've not been a ham forever. I've been a ham for over four decades and I'm not quite 56. If I'd been a ham for two days, I'd be your superior in amateur radio. You aren't a radio amateur. I learned plenty about diplomacy in the Foreign Service, not "foreign service" though that was not my area of expertise. Nothing compels me to suffer rude churls. Finally, it is not the "State Department 'foreign service'" but the Foreign Service of the United States. Don't you get anything right? We've got the "university lecturer" who survives the terrible storms that regularly destroy everything in Hawaii except the ham rigs and assists other hams in regards to USPS addresses. Why is "university lecturer" in quotes, Leonard? Are you being forced by your nature to live up to the N2EY profile? We have the coslonaut who wanted hearty congratulations for a feat he hasn't yet begun but was upset when he didn't get it. Aren't you stretching the truth more than a little? Weren't you, in fact, one who told him that his proposed feat couldn't be done? Didn't you launch into a lengthy diatribe only to have to eat your words when evidence was presented which contradicted your claims? Since we're on the subject, who on earth would think I was looking for congratulations on something I hadn't done? That's weird. My ill fated attempt to garner a few ideas in the group was simply that. It was a failure in that respect. But as in all things, there is good to be taken away from it. Just a little personal practice in dealing with the obtuse or deliberately antagonistic. Those involved may choose which one they want to be. And for those who think it was some kind of stupidity to expect anything other than obtuseness or deliberate antagonism, the chance was offered to act otherwise. That a person would choose that puts them in league with the bottom dwellers of the group. Don't like it? Too bad, deal with it. - Mike KB3EIA - |
In article , Dave Heil Kolonel Klunk uff
das uber-amateur staffel put on his newly cleaned uniform and polished boots, adjusted his monocle and swacked the podium with his riding crop to silence all conversation, get attention to bark out daily orders: Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * Effective immediately, ALL persons without a valid amateur radio licenses are FORBIDDEN to discuss, write, or even think about amateur radio subjects! Violators will be arrested, imprisoned, convicted of Crimes Against the State (as soon as the judges finish their DX contacts with illegal Frenchmen), and shot. There is NO appeal. The rest of us may discuss anything on the amateur bands. You may not. repeat of standing orders effective immediately By the way, did you mean that if we were in the room with you, we'd be in danger of direct physical harm? ...only from all the PCTA extras shooting themselves in the foot with their arrogant, dictatorial manner! :-) All sorts of small-caliber projectiles have been ricocheting all over and a distinct danger to all in that "room." :-) Did you plan to bore us to death? No, Kolonel Klunk, you do that SO well. Far be it for me to try and upstage das Grate, Full Dead. :-) RIP |
Len Anderson wrote: In article , Dave Heil Kolonel Klunk uff das uber-amateur staffel put on his newly cleaned uniform and polished boots, adjusted his monocle and swacked the podium with his riding crop to silence all conversation, get attention to bark out daily orders: Yet more assinine, childish analogies to the Nazis. Just like we've been saying all along. Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * Effective immediately, ALL persons without a valid amateur radio licenses are FORBIDDEN to discuss, write, or even think about amateur radio subjects! ACHTUNG ACHTUNG ACHTUNG Effective since the creation of the FRC and the institution of Amateur Radio licensing, it has been forbidden for unlicensed persons to use the Amateur Bands. Another Regulatory matter you skipped over, Lennie. What's with you, Your Scumminess? Didn't they teach you radio rules at professional radio school? Violators will be arrested, imprisoned, convicted of Crimes Against the State (as soon as the judges finish their DX contacts with illegal Frenchmen), and shot. Not shot, however the FCC has demonstrated a willingness to seek the incarcertaion of those who violate their rules. Your age might get you off of jail time, but your income, alleged summer home, etc, will ensure that the price of the NAL sticks. Too many assets to claim poverty. There is NO appeal. Sure there is...even for the UNappealing such as yourself. The rest of us may discuss anything on the amateur bands. You may not. repeat of standing orders effective immediately Repeat of reminder of rules that those unlicensed commissioners you are always ballyhooing about have enacted and enforce. Those rules apply even to the UNlicensed (alleged) professionals such as yourself. By the way, did you mean that if we were in the room with you, we'd be in danger of direct physical harm? ...only from all the PCTA extras shooting themselves in the foot with their arrogant, dictatorial manner! Not from THIS "PCTA extra". If I dicharge a firearm, I can promise one and all that whatever I am aiming at will get hit WHERE I am aiming at. The first time. All sorts of small-caliber projectiles have been ricocheting all over and a distinct danger to all in that "room." What you "fire" doesn't "ricochet", Lennie...more like "SPLAT". Malodorous, too. Did you plan to bore us to death? No, Kolonel Klunk, you do that SO well. Far be it for me to try and upstage das Grate, Full Dead. Nope...That's your schtick, Lennie. RIP Oh Lennie! You KNEW how long I've been waiting to see "RIP" over your name! Thanks! Steve, K4YZ |
Len "Foghorn Lenhorn" Anderson, self-anointed but non-appointed advocate
for something or other, having nothing better to do wrote: In article , Dave Heil Kolonel Klunk uff das uber-amateur staffel put on his newly cleaned uniform and polished boots, adjusted his monocle and swacked the podium with his riding crop to silence all conversation, get attention to bark out daily orders: Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * Effective immediately, ALL persons without a valid amateur radio licenses are FORBIDDEN to discuss, write, or even think about amateur radio subjects! Violators will be arrested, imprisoned, convicted of Crimes Against the State (as soon as the judges finish their DX contacts with illegal Frenchmen), and shot. There is NO appeal. You'll have to content yourself with carrying out your self-anointed advocacy for something or other here, Leonard. Your lack of an amateur radio license prevents you from doing it on the ham bands. You do as you can, the rest of us will do as we like. The rest of us may discuss anything on the amateur bands. You may not. repeat of standing orders effective immediately Face it, Leonard, this is your only forum and nobody is paying your views on the regulation of amateur radio much credence here. Did you notice the lack of response from those lurkers you wrote of earlier? By the way, did you mean that if we were in the room with you, we'd be in danger of direct physical harm? ...only from all the PCTA extras shooting themselves in the foot with their arrogant, dictatorial manner! :-) That's funny. When you wrote, "They ham it up, not on radio, not on any 'airwaves,' only on computers, saved from direct physical harm through time and distance by insulting all who don't agree with them." it didn't seem to refer to PCTA Extras doing anything to each other. All sorts of small-caliber projectiles have been ricocheting all over and a distinct danger to all in that "room." :-) What room? :-) Do you fancy yourself a large caliber guy? :-) Did you plan to bore us to death? No, Kolonel Klunk, you do that SO well. Far be it for me to try and upstage das Grate, Full Dead. :-) :-) :-) That doesn't make sense, Leonard. How can I be "saved in time and distance from direct physical harm" from myself? :-) :-) Enough of that. We still don't have a nurse who has killed patients. The Marine among us seems to have a pretty solid understanding of how to use the word "putz". Our "university lecturer" is actually a university lecturer. Jim isn't female nor a nun. You come off as being the prissy one. I've not been a ham forever though I'm certain that more than forty years sounds like a long time to one who has never obtained an amateur radio license. My specialty in the Foreign Service was communications, not diplomacy. If it is diplomacy you want, drop Dr. Rice a line. I should warn you though that she doesn't seem the type to put up with your foolish little old man routine either. Mike Coslo wrote of sending a helium-filled balloon to 100,000 feet. No wishes for congratulations on a before or after basis were written by him. You did, however, tell him that it couldn't be done. That statement really came back to bite you in the can. You get quite a number of things wrong. You have no right to suggest that radio amateurs, posting in an amateur radio newsgroup should be spending their time on the ham bands. Let me explain it to you Sparkie: newsgroup amateur radio stake in access access amateur radio Leonard Anderson x Radio Amateurs x x x Have a nice day. Dave K8MN |
K4YZ wrote: The statement said that Lennie has a history of taking other people's work. He proved it in his warping of your "endearment". He didn't even give you, his one and only NG "buddy", credit for the work. That single act will cause a rift between Len and me that can never be healed. So....What does YOUR lack of publishing credits have to do with Lennie's irresponsible and unprofessional behaviour. Everything. Had I been published in a professional journal, can you be sure that he would have stolen my work? |
In article .com, "bb"
writes: K4YZ wrote: The statement said that Lennie has a history of taking other people's work. He proved it in his warping of your "endearment". He didn't even give you, his one and only NG "buddy", credit for the work. That single act will cause a rift between Len and me that can never be healed. Poor Stebie da Avenging Angle sees only the WRONG in his opponents. Tsk. So....What does YOUR lack of publishing credits have to do with Lennie's irresponsible and unprofessional behaviour. Everything. Had I been published in a professional journal, can you be sure that he would have stolen my work? Brian, you have to realize that any printed article to Stebie is new to him, therefore everything he reads is a "first principles" topic. He imagines all those articles are stand-alone and cannot ever be commented upon...therefore the slightest act of just mentioning them are what he considers plagiarism. :-) Coupled with his mindset of "all opponents do wrong in anything," he is constantly in outrage that opponents exist. ========== In printed publications sold all over the USA and worldwide, many are involved in viewing and checking any submitted work. Every publisher is subject to copyright laws and prosecution thereof if court action is taken. Publishers don't want that. Authors don't want that. Stebie wants to feed on his perceived "wrongness" of fair-use mentions or references of other works. That's just ignorance on his part (or his sense of right/wrong is so warped by hatred of opponents that he cannot tell which is which)...since fair-use mentions and references have long been a part of published papers and articles. [at least over the last century] As to what constitutes fair-use, that is covered in Copyright Law under Title 17, United States Code. So is references and mentions of other published works. For periodicals, the common convention is for publishers to request "first rights" as part of compensation of authors. That means the publishers have "first dibs" on publishing that work and can reprint that work as many times as they wish. Authors can publish or get published that same work once the publisher- puchaser has printed it the first time. There are many variations on the author compensation and some may include sole proprietorship of an author's work. [pecuniary compensation falls under "work for hire" rules by the IRS and is therefore taxable income...mentioned as a sidelight] Some authors can cut a deal with publishers so that authors have free rein on republishing, but that is rare. What most readers overlook is that a published work can be changed in many ways. Schematics can be redrawn, diagrams can be done differently, different accompanying photographs used, and text rewritten. That changes the nature of the "work." Determination of whether such work is a "copy" of the original published (and copyrighted) is a very long, studious, and arduous proceeding (not to mention expensive) which is hardly ever done. It isn't worthwhile unless it involves millions of dollars. The ARRL gets away with a benign sort of plagiarism (but isn't such, per se) by getting ALL rights to publishing (usually) for article in their periodicals. They do reprint periodical articles in changed form in the Handbook and other book-form publications...and the original author gets NO money under that compensation form...and usually is uncredited for the work in the ARRL's republishing. That's not a "slam" at the League but is standard practice by them and has been so for years. It's business...and worthwhile to them...but seldom so to the authors. Do you think Hartley, Pierce, or Colpitts (or their estates) get anything for all the repeated articles on the whichness of the what in oscillators? Nothing. Nada. Zip. Yet the articles pop up now and then and are found in all kinds of electronics texts. Anyone can mention those names, draw schematics for them, make them, measure them and it is NOT "plagiarism" to do so...unless such work is a direct copy of a previously-published article on same. In tutorial articles, basic circuits can be explained in a number of ways. Tutorials are far from "first principles" kind of subject and are done for the benefit of readers who wish to further their knowledge of a particular subject. Tutorial articles aren't plagiarism of any sort unless they are an obvious copy of something already published. Each presentation in a tutorial, the explanations, are unique. The uniqueness can be copyrighted. That's the way part of publishing works and it's been that way for some time. Some hatred-clouded "avengers" want to redefine all rules on uniqueness or writing skill and say their hate-subject is a plagiarist. No proof. Just a hollered pejorative by someone who can't think straight in his rage. |
In article .com, "K4YZ"
writes: Len Anderson wrote: In article , Dave Heil Kolonel Klunk uff das uber-amateur staffel put on his newly cleaned uniform and polished boots, adjusted his monocle and swacked the podium with his riding crop to silence all conversation, get attention to bark out daily orders: Yet more assinine, childish analogies to the Nazis. Just like we've been saying all along. Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * Effective immediately, ALL persons without a valid amateur radio licenses are FORBIDDEN to discuss, write, or even think about amateur radio subjects! ACHTUNG ACHTUNG ACHTUNG Effective since the creation of the FRC and the institution of Amateur Radio licensing, it has been forbidden for unlicensed persons to use the Amateur Bands. Another Regulatory matter you skipped over, Lennie. Sorry, little feldwebel, but notice that das Kolonel done said "here" and that can only mean the newsgroup. No amateur license is needed to access this here newsgroup. :-) What's with you, Your Scumminess? Didn't they teach you radio rules at professional radio school? What "professional radio school?" :-) Tsk, tsk, not all amateur bands are allocated now or in the past to be exclusively for amateurs. :-) Your age might get you off of jail time, but your income, alleged summer home, etc, will ensure that the price of the NAL sticks. Too many assets to claim poverty. So...you are still under the impression that this newsgroup is elite, exclusive, and can only be accessed by licensed amateurs? I'm not impressed. Those rules apply even to the UNlicensed (alleged) professionals such as yourself. Tsk, I have no allegiances with the UN. And, I am licensed as well as a professional in electronics-radio. TS, boobie. ...only from all the PCTA extras shooting themselves in the foot with their arrogant, dictatorial manner! Not from THIS "PCTA extra". If I dicharge a firearm, I can promise one and all that whatever I am aiming at will get hit WHERE I am aiming at. The first time. Poor nursie. Must be a paraplegic many times over by now. Hope you got a good buy on a wheelchair... Oh Lennie! You KNEW how long I've been waiting to see "RIP" over your name! Thanks! Tsk, Tsk, TSK! A "healthcare professional" always wishing an opponent will die! Not a healthy attitude. You must be a riot around those in ICU, running around and pinching the I-V tubes and canulas of all those who don't smile at you... We'll just put you in the same category as Elfren Saldivar the 2nd. |
In article .com, "bb"
writes: K4YZ wrote: The statement said that Lennie has a history of taking other people's work. He proved it in his warping of your "endearment". He didn't even give you, his one and only NG "buddy", credit for the work. That single act will cause a rift between Len and me that can never be healed. Poor Stebie da Avenging Angle sees only the WRONG in his opponents. Tsk. So....What does YOUR lack of publishing credits have to do with Lennie's irresponsible and unprofessional behaviour. Everything. Had I been published in a professional journal, can you be sure that he would have stolen my work? Brian, you have to realize that any printed article to Stebie is new to him, therefore everything he reads is a "first principles" topic. He imagines all those articles are stand-alone and cannot ever be commented upon...therefore the slightest act of just mentioning them are what he considers plagiarism. :-) Coupled with his mindset of "all opponents do wrong in anything," he is constantly in outrage that opponents exist. ========== In printed publications sold all over the USA and worldwide, many are involved in viewing and checking any submitted work. Every publisher is subject to copyright laws and prosecution thereof if court action is taken. Publishers don't want that. Authors don't want that. Stebie wants to feed on his perceived "wrongness" of fair-use mentions or references of other works. That's just ignorance on his part (or his sense of right/wrong is so warped by hatred of opponents that he cannot tell which is which)...since fair-use mentions and references have long been a part of published papers and articles. [at least over the last century] As to what constitutes fair-use, that is covered in Copyright Law under Title 17, United States Code. So is references and mentions of other published works. For periodicals, the common convention is for publishers to request "first rights" as part of compensation of authors. That means the publishers have "first dibs" on publishing that work and can reprint that work as many times as they wish. Authors can publish or get published that same work once the publisher- puchaser has printed it the first time. There are many variations on the author compensation and some may include sole proprietorship of an author's work. [pecuniary compensation falls under "work for hire" rules by the IRS and is therefore taxable income...mentioned as a sidelight] Some authors can cut a deal with publishers so that authors have free rein on republishing, but that is rare. What most readers overlook is that a published work can be changed in many ways. Schematics can be redrawn, diagrams can be done differently, different accompanying photographs used, and text rewritten. That changes the nature of the "work." Determination of whether such work is a "copy" of the original published (and copyrighted) is a very long, studious, and arduous proceeding (not to mention expensive) which is hardly ever done. It isn't worthwhile unless it involves millions of dollars. The ARRL gets away with a benign sort of plagiarism (but isn't such, per se) by getting ALL rights to publishing (usually) for article in their periodicals. They do reprint periodical articles in changed form in the Handbook and other book-form publications...and the original author gets NO money under that compensation form...and usually is uncredited for the work in the ARRL's republishing. That's not a "slam" at the League but is standard practice by them and has been so for years. It's business...and worthwhile to them...but seldom so to the authors. Do you think Hartley, Pierce, or Colpitts (or their estates) get anything for all the repeated articles on the whichness of the what in oscillators? Nothing. Nada. Zip. Yet the articles pop up now and then and are found in all kinds of electronics texts. Anyone can mention those names, draw schematics for them, make them, measure them and it is NOT "plagiarism" to do so...unless such work is a direct copy of a previously-published article on same. In tutorial articles, basic circuits can be explained in a number of ways. Tutorials are far from "first principles" kind of subject and are done for the benefit of readers who wish to further their knowledge of a particular subject. Tutorial articles aren't plagiarism of any sort unless they are an obvious copy of something already published. Each presentation in a tutorial, the explanations, are unique. The uniqueness can be copyrighted. That's the way part of publishing works and it's been that way for some time. Some hatred-clouded "avengers" want to redefine all rules on uniqueness or writing skill and say their hate-subject is a plagiarist. No proof. Just a hollered pejorative by someone who can't think straight in his rage. |
Len Anderson wrote: Oh Lennie! You KNEW how long I've been waiting to see "RIP" over your name! Thanks! Tsk, Tsk, TSK! A "healthcare professional" always wishing an opponent will die! Not a healthy attitude. Let's get something straight, Lennie. We're NOT "opponents". That would suggest that we were mutual combatants, equal to the task of said combat. You are not remotely qualified to engage me on ANY aspect of any subject except electronics theory, and I've already "given" you that. But that's where your knowledge and "experience" stop. You've been disproven on every other rant you've cared to partake in. You look foolish. Perhaps YOU fancy yourself an "opponent", but that is all you will ever do. You're a liar. You're deceitful. You're a loser. Sucks to be you. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
Len Anderson wrote: In article .com, "K4YZ" writes: Len Anderson wrote: In article , Dave Heil Kolonel Klunk uff das uber-amateur staffel put on his newly cleaned uniform and polished boots, adjusted his monocle and swacked the podium with his riding crop to silence all conversation, get attention to bark out daily orders: Yet more assinine, childish analogies to the Nazis. Just like we've been saying all along. Nope, you have it wrong again. The rest of us may discuss amateur radio policy here or on the amateur bands. You may not. * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * ACHTUNG * Effective immediately, ALL persons without a valid amateur radio licenses are FORBIDDEN to discuss, write, or even think about amateur radio subjects! ACHTUNG ACHTUNG ACHTUNG Effective since the creation of the FRC and the institution of Amateur Radio licensing, it has been forbidden for unlicensed persons to use the Amateur Bands. Another Regulatory matter you skipped over, Lennie. Sorry, little feldwebel, but notice that das Kolonel done said "here" and that can only mean the newsgroup. No amateur license is needed to access this here newsgroup. Nope. But one sure is necessary to be an active Amateur Radio operator, hence being able to acquire PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE in BEING an Amateur. You've aggressively avoided getting a license, yet your lack of experience routinely leaves you with your wrinkled buns in the air for all to see. What's with you, Your Scumminess? Didn't they teach you radio rules at professional radio school? What "professional radio school?" That's my point, Lennie. You don't have the training. Tsk, tsk, not all amateur bands are allocated now or in the past to be exclusively for amateurs. That's not the issue now, is it, Lennie? The issue is your lack of qualifcations to wield an informed opinion on Amatuer Radio matters. Your age might get you off of jail time, but your income, alleged summer home, etc, will ensure that the price of the NAL sticks. Too many assets to claim poverty. So...you are still under the impression that this newsgroup is elite, exclusive, and can only be accessed by licensed amateurs? We weren't talking about "only" the newsgroup. Maybe your pretend shrink wife is impressed with your shuffling, but we know better. I'm not impressed. And you're not very impressive, either. Big talk. No facts. Frequent errors. Those rules apply even to the UNlicensed (alleged) professionals such as yourself. Tsk, I have no allegiances with the UN. And, I am licensed as well as a professional in electronics-radio. TS, boobie. You are not a licensed Amateur. That is a fact. And I doubt you have ANY "allegiances" to anyone but you, Lennie. And that incudes the Veterans that you shamefully humiliate with your pitiful personal use of thier sacrifices for YOUR glorification. ...only from all the PCTA extras shooting themselves in the foot with their arrogant, dictatorial manner! Not from THIS "PCTA extra". If I dicharge a firearm, I can promise one and all that whatever I am aiming at will get hit WHERE I am aiming at. The first time. Poor nursie. Must be a paraplegic many times over by now. Hope you got a good buy on a wheelchair... The only wheelchair I have ever or will ever have a need for was my daughters. She's gone. I can get one for YOU though. Cheap. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com