Lennie Anderson...Self Destructive Or Just Doesn't Get It...?!?!
 

K4YZ wrote:

....the usual stabs with the usual title for someone not in the K4YZ fan
club.

Nothing new there.

But why does he do it?

Simple. He can't help himself.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

...the usual stabs with the usual title for someone not in the K4YZ
fan
club.

Nothing new there.

But why does he do it?

Simple. He can't help himself.

And as ususal, Brain, you miss the point.

It's not about me. It's about you and your lying buddy.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
[so angry he can't think or type straight]
wrote on Feb 22, 10:43 am:

This is a forum about Amateur Radio POLICY.

Every time.

Oooooo! That's a keeper! We'd all better laminate-
that-and-keep-it-in-our-wallets! Or maybe frame it
to hang on the wall!

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

All hear and obey!

Except all PCTA morsemen...they can talk about
anything they want but all others are not. QED.

And again you miss (avoid) the point. It's not about "judging"
anyone or imposing any restrictions.

It's about pointing out what a twofaced, lying scumbag you are and
how YOU "impose" such restrictions on EVERYone else except you.

I could care less what you "talk" about.

It's that you, on the one hand, "demand" that everyone talk about
what YOU want to talk about when you want to talk about it, but then
quickly attempt to redirect anyone who dares stray from YOUR agenda
regardless of what the topic is.

RRAP is an "amateur radio policy" newsgroup as long as we discuss
nothing but the Morse Code test issue...Unless, of course, YOU want to
discuss 1950's era Army nets, radio controlled models, politics, the
value of your rela estate or retirement holdings, etc. Then it can be
a discussion group on any of those topics.

Thankfully you reintroduce new examples almost every day of YOUR
"double standard", thereby greatly reducing my workload and reproving
once again what a chronic, self-serving liar you are.

Thanks.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

...the usual stabs with the usual title for someone not in the K4YZ
fan
club.

Nothing new there.

But why does he do it?

Simple. He can't help himself.

And as ususal, Brain, you miss the point.

It's not about me. It's about you and your lying buddy.

Steve, K4YZ

It's all about you.

Nurse, heel thyself.

bb wrote:

It's all about you.

Nurse, heel thyself.

As opposed to YOU, Brain, who IS a "heel"....

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

It's all about you.

Nurse, heel thyself.

As opposed to YOU, Brain, who IS a "heel"....

Steve, K4YZ


There you go with the name-calling again.

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
[so angry he can't think or type straight]
wrote on Feb 22, 10:43 am:

This is a forum about Amateur Radio POLICY.

Every time.

Oooooo! That's a keeper! We'd all better laminate-
that-and-keep-it-in-our-wallets! Or maybe frame it
to hang on the wall!

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

All hear and obey!

Except all PCTA morsemen...they can talk about
anything they want but all others are not. QED.

And again you miss (avoid) the point. It's not about "judging"
anyone or imposing any restrictions.

But that's all you do and all your try to do.

wrote:

[so angry he can't think or type straight]
wrote on Feb 22, 10:43 am:

This is a forum about Amateur Radio POLICY.

Hi! Hi, hi, hi!

Every time.

Oooooo! That's a keeper! We'd all better laminate-
that-and-keep-it-in-our-wallets! Or maybe frame it
to hang on the wall!

I think if you work 5 continents and confine all RRAP discussions to
"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail a
certificate.

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

Isn't he the hanging judge? Definitely full of beans.

All hear and obey!

Here's where I have to respectfully disagree.

Except all PCTA morsemen...they can talk about
anything they want but all others are not. QED.



I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

bb wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

To what purpose? Is there some new "angle" or debatable bit of
"evidence" as to why the Code exam should stay or go?

Or do you just want to give Lennie one more avenue to tell us how
he fixed radios in the 50's without a code test?

I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

There's not a serious word come from Lennie is 8 years. Why
would he start today?

Steve, K4YZ

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And again you miss (avoid) the point. It's not about
"judging"
anyone or imposing any restrictions.

But that's all you do and all your try to do.

"...your try to do"...?!?!

No, it's not, Brian. I warned you where YOUR conduct would take
us two weeks ago. You drove right on in. "It's your world, Boss".

All I ask is that people be truthful and take responsibility for
thier actions like the rest of us do. To acknowledge their errors when
those errors have been shown and proven to BE errors.

You and Lennie think it's OK to lie and be deceitful in public. I
say that's not civil. You say I'm nuts for pointing out that you are
liars. I may be "nuts" for being as persistent as I am, but that still
doesn't diminish the fact that you and Lennie are liars.

It really is THAT simple.

Steve, K4YZ

"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail a
certificate.

But...is it suitable for framing? :-)

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI ! :-)

This newsgroup is the PCTA extra's Chat Room where they can
all talk about what's on their minds and express all their hatred
and frustration against those against the morse code test.

NO dissention is allowed. If dissention with the established
tradition and trappings of the Church of St. Hiram show up,
all dissenters will be harrassed, hounded, and haunted by
the PCTA extras.

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

Isn't he the hanging judge? Definitely full of beans.

He wants to hang them high...and often. :-)

"Full of beans?" The flatulence from him is awful!


I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

The PCTA extras don't get it. [they never had it... :-) ]

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

To what purpose? Is there some new "angle" or debatable bit of
"evidence" as to why the Code exam should stay or go?

Or do you just want to give Lennie one more avenue to tell us
how
he fixed radios in the 50's without a code test?

A simple exercise in on-topic free speech.

Are you objecting already?

wrote:
"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail
a
certificate.

But...is it suitable for framing? :-)

Given a little decopage fluid and a very expensive custom frame?

Sure.

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI ! :-)

This newsgroup is the PCTA extra's Chat Room where they can
all talk about what's on their minds and express all their hatred
and frustration against those against the morse code test.

NO dissention is allowed. If dissention with the established
tradition and trappings of the Church of St. Hiram show up,
all dissenters will be harrassed, hounded, and haunted by
the PCTA extras.

I hear that the Chinese have a patent infringement on the Wrenchy
Stitch, and will be flooding USA hamfests starting the 3rd week of May.

wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI !

Let's try and see what happens!

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Perhaps Coslo might make it 4. Coslonaut wants so much
to be an olde-tymer he'll even refer to himself as an "extra
lite" to show his sycophantsies (e.g. synchronous fantasies).

I didn't notice that in the original post.

What a very, very odd thing to type..........


It is the latest in a very long string of very odd things which
Leonard
has typed.


One of the first times I have been accused of trying to
impress others.
Go figure. Mostly I just irritate others.


Mike, Mike, Mike. You have a callsign. You're guilty of trying
to
impress Len.

Heck, I've had it all wrong, Dave. I thought having a
callsign
*offended* him!

Maybe he's right and I am a little dull...

Trying to impress him offends him. That would, in Len-speak, make
you
"overly-proud".

Next thing you know, Len'll be picturing you in an invisible Waffen
SS
uniform and his thoughts will drift to having you punish him. It
gets
really strange *after* that.

What about the Putzmeister ISN'T "strange", Dave?

He's an ex-radio technician (wannabe engineer) who can't pass a
radio exam.

He embellished his military "career" with tales of derring-do of
guys who were KIA 3 years before he was even inducted. (And let us not
forget the "hair raising" tale of "incomming artillery" and how he
served "under the threat to the Soviet Bear" even though that "Bear"
was still being manufactured!)

He makes up stories about the alleged "dishonesty" of ARRL board
members then doesn't provide a lick of evidence.

He's quick to tell everyone else what they "are" or "aren't", yet
isn't any of those things either.

He cries "foul" over having been challenged in the eyes of the
FCC, yet has spammed ECFS with almost 2 dozen "he's not objective
because..." "rebuttals" of licensed Amateurs with decades of
experience.

He claims he can operate "anywhere" with his GROL, but can't stand
it when it's pointed out to him that his GROL SPECIFICALLY restrains
his "operating privileges".

He was never "published" in a professional journal and was part of
an Amateur Radio journal that went belly-up with him as part of the
"Editorial Staff".

He routinely makes glaring errors of fact and practice in Amateur
policy...

Could it be cuz he has no practical experience in Amateur
matters...?!?!

Me thinks so!

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Mike, Mike, Mike. You have a callsign. You're guilty of trying
to
impress Len.

Heck, I've had it all wrong, Dave. I thought having a
callsign
*offended* him!

Maybe he's right and I am a little dull...

Trying to impress him offends him. That would, in Len-speak, make
you
"overly-proud".

Next thing you know, Len'll be picturing you in an invisible Waffen
SS
uniform and his thoughts will drift to having you punish him. It
gets
really strange *after* that.

What about the Putzmeister ISN'T "strange", Dave?

After reading his output here for nearly a decade, I can honestly answer
that I don't see much. He recently wrote about "marching to a different
drummer". Well, he's the kind of guy who marches in a parade with 150
others and shouts at them that *they're all out of step* with him.

He's an ex-radio technician (wannabe engineer) who can't pass a
radio exam.

Be fair, Steve. Len might be able to pass an exam. He might not. He
might not be able to pass a morse exam at this point. Len has told us
of a decades-long interest in amateur radio. He has told us about
getting an "Extra right out of the box". He has also told us that he
has no interest in obtaining an amateur radio license. In short, it
really doesn't matter what Len could or could not do. The chances of
him even making an attempt are quite small.

He embellished his military "career" with tales of derring-do of
guys who were KIA 3 years before he was even inducted. (And let us not
forget the "hair raising" tale of "incomming artillery" and how he
served "under the threat to the Soviet Bear" even though that "Bear"
was still being manufactured!)

Len is big on wrapping himself in patriotic bunting. You'll note that
when I wrote "Vietnam combat veteran" very recently, Len's response was
"COMBAT!?"

He makes up stories about the alleged "dishonesty" of ARRL board
members then doesn't provide a lick of evidence.

As you've no doubt seen, Len can't answer a question with a straight
answer.

He's quick to tell everyone else what they "are" or "aren't", yet
isn't any of those things either.

No, he's not. One of the things he isn't happens to be a radio amateur.
In that, he's an odd man out. At very least, he's an odd man.

He cries "foul" over having been challenged in the eyes of the
FCC, yet has spammed ECFS with almost 2 dozen "he's not objective
because..." "rebuttals" of licensed Amateurs with decades of
experience.

I'm telling you, Steve, he has to have been the subject of discussion at
the Commission on one or more occasions.

He claims he can operate "anywhere" with his GROL, but can't stand
it when it's pointed out to him that his GROL SPECIFICALLY restrains
his "operating privileges".

What's the diff? His commercial license has nothing to do with amateur
radio.

He was never "published" in a professional journal and was part of
an Amateur Radio journal that went belly-up with him as part of the
"Editorial Staff".

I don't think it likely that Len's presence had anything to do with "Ham
Radio" ceasing publication. I went through some of my back issues and
viewed some of Len's material. None of his articles were construction
articles. None were interesting enough to me to have read them when
first published. None interested me enough to read them through when I
saw them recently. I saw them as stuff to be skipped between amplifier
or antenna articles.

He routinely makes glaring errors of fact and practice in Amateur
policy...

He does get quite a number of things partially or completely wrong.
Then again, he has no background in amateur radio.

Could it be cuz he has no practical experience in Amateur
matters...?!?!

Oh, I think Len has plenty of experience in amateur matters, just not
amateur radio matters.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

He's an ex-radio technician (wannabe engineer) who can't pass
a
radio exam.

Be fair, Steve. Len might be able to pass an exam. He might not.

Ya wanna toss a coin on it...?!?! =)

He might not be able to pass a morse exam at this point. Len has
told us
of a decades-long interest in amateur radio. He has told us about
getting an "Extra right out of the box". He has also told us that he
has no interest in obtaining an amateur radio license. In short, it
really doesn't matter what Len could or could not do. The chances of
him even making an attempt are quite small.

And I bet there are other things even smaller in his life...

But it really is what he's NOT about...As in "not about to do any
of the things he said he would..."

He embellished his military "career" with tales of derring-do
of
guys who were KIA 3 years before he was even inducted. (And let us
not
forget the "hair raising" tale of "incomming artillery" and how he
served "under the threat to the Soviet Bear" even though that
"Bear"
was still being manufactured!)

Len is big on wrapping himself in patriotic bunting. You'll note
that
when I wrote "Vietnam combat veteran" very recently, Len's response
was
"COMBAT!?"

I am sure Lennie's sole exposure to "combat" has been ducking a
rolling pin by Mrs Lennie. Or dragging himself back to the barracks
via the benjo ditches after a night of revelry in post-war rear-area
Japan...Had to be a LOT of celebrating that they weren't the unlucky
schmucks in Korea.

He's quick to tell everyone else what they "are" or "aren't",
yet
isn't any of those things either.

No, he's not. One of the things he isn't happens to be a radio
amateur.
In that, he's an odd man out. At very least, he's an odd man.

Hear Hear!

He cries "foul" over having been challenged in the eyes of the
FCC, yet has spammed ECFS with almost 2 dozen "he's not objective
because..." "rebuttals" of licensed Amateurs with decades of
experience.

I'm telling you, Steve, he has to have been the subject of discussion
at
the Commission on one or more occasions.

"Discussion", or ribauld laughter?

He claims he can operate "anywhere" with his GROL, but can't
stand
it when it's pointed out to him that his GROL SPECIFICALLY
restrains
his "operating privileges".

What's the diff? His commercial license has nothing to do with
amateur
radio.

Too true. Nor does his Army experience, his "aerospace" career,
or his labours at a plastic model company.

But we hear a LOT about those...

He was never "published" in a professional journal and was
part of
an Amateur Radio journal that went belly-up with him as part of the
"Editorial Staff".

I don't think it likely that Len's presence had anything to do with
"Ham
Radio" ceasing publication. I went through some of my back issues
and
viewed some of Len's material. None of his articles were
construction
articles. None were interesting enough to me to have read them when
first published. None interested me enough to read them through
when I
saw them recently. I saw them as stuff to be skipped between
amplifier
or antenna articles.

I bought a couple copies of "HR" for .20c a copy at a flea market
just to read his articles.

Flighty stuff. Impractical. And after five years of asking him
to do so, he's not provided a single instance of where his
"theoretical" dissertations were part or parcel to any "real" project.

Not a one.

He routinely makes glaring errors of fact and practice in
Amateur
policy...

He does get quite a number of things partially or completely wrong.
Then again, he has no background in amateur radio.

Could it be cuz he has no practical experience in Amateur
matters...?!?!

Oh, I think Len has plenty of experience in amateur matters, just not
amateur radio matters.

VERY amateurish, I'd say...

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

(whole bunch of stuff snipped)

Steve,

To answer the title question:

"He Just Doesn't Get It".

http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2715

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(whole bunch of stuff snipped)

Steve,

To answer the title question:

"He Just Doesn't Get It".

http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2715

73 de Jim, N2EY

Looks like Jim didn't have anything to do at work again.

bb wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

(whole bunch of stuff snipped)

Steve,

To answer the title question:

"He Just Doesn't Get It".

http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2715

73 de Jim, N2EY

Looks like Jim didn't have anything to do at work again.

You're still getting upset over getting YOUR nose rubbed in YOUR
droppings, I see, Brian.

Pity that. If you'd stop doing it, we'd stop rubbing.

Steve, K4YZ

bb wrote:
wrote:
Brian Burke wrote on Wed, Mar 9 2005 3:29 pm:

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
He just can't help himself, that's why. He's mental.

You'll notice that when I genrerate a thread with such an
allegation, I provide other corroborating comments, with links
to
pertinent threads.

You "genrerate" lots and lots of comments. Lying comments. And
start
lots and lots of new threads. Lying threads. Usually shouting
someones name and trying to denigrate them. Repeated again and
again.
Perhaps someday someone will read them and beleive them. But not
anytime soon, and no one of average or higher intelligence.

Absolutely. That's been the style of the Avenging Angle
of Dearth for years.

No lies in that ovservation.

Not sure what an "ovservation" is, but I am even more perplexed by
this constant reference to a person called "Avenging Angle".

It's a common propaganda technique familiarly called
"the big Lie" wherein some untruth is repeated over
and over and over and over again in public in an
attempt to make others believe it is "true." It isn't.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Correct. And the "Big Lie" ("I am going to get my Extra Lite out
of the box", for one example, or "Unlicensed devices play a major role
in emergency comms" for another) is well used by Leonard H Anderson and
Brian P Burke.

Both are persistent liars. (I started to say "accomplished", but
so far neither one of them has been very good at it since they always
seem to get caught.)

The "big Lie" technique was used rather successfully
by the Nazi party in the 1930s and 1940s.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Godwin invoked.

Rest snipped. No use wasting bandwidth on one liar trying to
support the lies of another.

Putzii.

Steve, K4YZ

bb wrote:
wrote:
Brian Burke wrote on Wed, Mar 9 2005 3:29 pm:

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
He just can't help himself, that's why. He's mental.

You'll notice that when I genrerate a thread with such an
allegation, I provide other corroborating comments, with links
to
pertinent threads.

You "genrerate" lots and lots of comments. Lying comments. And
start
lots and lots of new threads. Lying threads. Usually shouting
someones name and trying to denigrate them. Repeated again and
again.
Perhaps someday someone will read them and beleive them. But not
anytime soon, and no one of average or higher intelligence.

Absolutely. That's been the style of the Avenging Angle
of Dearth for years.

No lies in that ovservation.

Not sure what an "ovservation" is, but I am even more perplexed by
this constant reference to a person called "Avenging Angle".

It's a common propaganda technique familiarly called
"the big Lie" wherein some untruth is repeated over
and over and over and over again in public in an
attempt to make others believe it is "true." It isn't.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Correct. And the "Big Lie" ("I am going to get my Extra Lite out
of the box", for one example, or "Unlicensed devices play a major role
in emergency comms" for another) is well used by Leonard H Anderson and
Brian P Burke.

Both are persistent liars. (I started to say "accomplished", but
so far neither one of them has been very good at it since they always
seem to get caught.)

The "big Lie" technique was used rather successfully
by the Nazi party in the 1930s and 1940s.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Godwin invoked.

Rest snipped. No use wasting bandwidth on one liar trying to
support the lies of another.

Putzii.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:
Brian Burke wrote on Wed, Mar 9 2005 3:29 pm:

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
He just can't help himself, that's why. He's mental.

You'll notice that when I genrerate a thread with such an
allegation, I provide other corroborating comments, with links
to
pertinent threads.

You "genrerate" lots and lots of comments. Lying comments. And
start
lots and lots of new threads. Lying threads. Usually shouting
someones name and trying to denigrate them. Repeated again and
again.
Perhaps someday someone will read them and beleive them. But
not
anytime soon, and no one of average or higher intelligence.

Absolutely. That's been the style of the Avenging Angle
of Dearth for years.

No lies in that ovservation.

Not sure what an "ovservation" is, but I am even more perplexed
by
this constant reference to a person called "Avenging Angle".

It's a common propaganda technique familiarly called
"the big Lie" wherein some untruth is repeated over
and over and over and over again in public in an
attempt to make others believe it is "true." It isn't.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Correct. And the "Big Lie" ("I am going to get my Extra Lite
out
of the box", for one example, or "Unlicensed devices play a major
role
in emergency comms" for another) is well used by Leonard H Anderson
and
Brian P Burke.

Both are persistent liars. (I started to say "accomplished",
but
so far neither one of them has been very good at it since they always
seem to get caught.)

The "big Lie" technique was used rather successfully
by the Nazi party in the 1930s and 1940s.

Yep. No lies in that observation.

Godwin invoked.

Rest snipped. No use wasting bandwidth on one liar trying to
support the lies of another.

Putzii.

Steve, K4YZ

I guess the Nazi party has told no lies, according to Robeson's
invocation.

Robeson's lies are stacking up like cordwood. Too bad all those lies
aren't pulpable.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Rest snipped. No use wasting bandwidth on one liar trying to
support the lies of another.

Putzii.

I guess the Nazi party has told no lies, according to Robeson's
invocation.

Godwin invoked again.

Robeson's lies are stacking up like cordwood. Too bad all those lies
aren't pulpable.

Brian P Burke has yet to produce anything from me that is not
truthful.

And I think yoiu meant "palpable", Brian...But then we ARE used to
you trying to use nursing terminology only to get it wrong.

What IS "palpable" is the sense of how frustrated you are getting
by being constantly backed into the corner.

The funny part is that you are the one backing you into it!

Face it, Brian...you're an idiot. We have.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Rest snipped. No use wasting bandwidth on one liar trying
to
support the lies of another.

Putzii.

I guess the Nazi party has told no lies, according to Robeson's
invocation.

Godwin invoked again.

Your words, not mine.

Robeson's lies are stacking up like cordwood. Too bad all those
lies
aren't pulpable.

Brian P Burke has yet to produce anything from me that is not
truthful.

Slashed tires? Rocks through windows? Terrorized wives? Homosexual
inuendo? Pedophilia inuendo? Dialing...

All bullying from the foul keyboard of Steven Robeson/K4YZ/K4CAP.

Then there's the stupid stuff, like "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur
Radio." Hi!

Hi, hi! I still get a kick out of that awesome absurdity every time I
see it.

And I think yoiu meant "palpable", Brian...But then we ARE used
to
you trying to use nursing terminology only to get it wrong.

There you go thinking, not your strongest point. Nor is "humour."

No, I meant "pulpable" as in your "lies are stacking up like cordwood"
at the paper mill. Hi!

Humor impaired, remember?