bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Hey Mike...It's not THAT far fetched...Burghardt in NY has had
that
young lady in the tight fitting sweater for years...Musta beem
selling
SOMEthing!

But not radios, huh???

Only radios.

You and the e-mailer have the same problem, Brain. A one-track,
race to evil conclusions minds.

Bad thing to have.

The sleazy nudge-nudge insinuation in your "Musta beem seeling
SOMEthing!" comment is one of the lowest forms of attack I've ever
seen
on rrap.

Not really, but it is true to Steve's style.

What style?

I'll expect to see a sincere unconditional apology on rrap by
the end of today, or I'll consider forwarding your trashy comments
to
Michele and Jim.

Unlikely.

Absolutely unlikely. The respondant was asked both here and in
private e-mail to show where an "attack" or an intent to attack was
expressed.

The respondant failed to do so...That being because there wasn't
one.

The "attack" was the respondant picking a fight with me for no
other reason than it WAS me making the comments.


You took offense...Too bad for you. You know as well as I do
that
people can "take offense" at the most innocent of comments
all-the-while letting morbid profanity and bold threats roll off
thier
backs. This is one of those moments.

Have a nice day.

Steve, K4YZ

Innocent comments - hi, hi! Robeson likes to make inuendo.

The "innuendo" was the respondants.

If you call him on it, he'll try to turn you into the deviant.

What's to "call", Brain?

He's always the victim.

Unlike you or Lennie who always have to be a victim, I REFUSE to be
a victim. That's probably what grates your cheese.

Probably learned that tactic while rehearsing for his 100% disability
hearing.

And there goes Brain with yet another lie that he'll never
substantiate.

Steve, K4YZ