|
Goodbye Roger...Why You Lose ISP's
Hello. My name is Pam. I once ran an ISP in the West Virginia/Ohio area.
Roger Wiseman was at one time a subscriber to my services, but that didn't last long. Why, you ask? Mr. Wiseman was never the best of customers and from the very first week of him signing with us the complaints rolled in. The majority of the complaints centered on the fact that Mr. Wiseman was posting libel and did so with a before unheard of amount of filthy verbiage. I, Pam, warned Mr. Wiseman on several occasions. Mr. Wiseman responded by placing the blame on others, others whose names or IP addresses he could not provide. He assured me that the violations would stop. Then, about three years ago, I received a printout from a person who called himself Arf! Arf! In the printout were numerous posts, with headers, made by Mr. Wiseman in which Mr. Wiseman described me in the most vile of terms. After receiving these printouts I decided that it would be useless to issue any further warnings to Mr. Wiseman. I then terminated his account. Mister Wiseman was with us for less than a year and was told that he would not be allowed another account. It is our policy to refuse service to anybody who violates our terms of service, those being the use of abusive language and the posting of libelous statements. Mister Wiseman was placed on notice that he is no longer welcome and need never again apply for another account with us. Mister Wiseman has been informed that he is a "persona non gratis". Pam ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
"Pam" PamHoffer@nosplam wrote in message ... Hello. My name is Pam. I once ran an ISP in the West Virginia/Ohio area. Roger Wiseman was at one time a subscriber to my services, but that didn't last long. Why, you ask? Mr. Wiseman was never the best of customers and from the very first week of him signing with us the complaints rolled in. The majority of the complaints centered on the fact that Mr. Wiseman was posting libel and did so with a before unheard of amount of filthy verbiage. I, Pam, warned Mr. Wiseman on several occasions. Mr. Wiseman responded by placing the blame on others, others whose names or IP addresses he could not provide. He assured me that the violations would stop. Then, about three years ago, I received a printout from a person who called himself Arf! Arf! In the printout were numerous posts, with headers, made by Mr. Wiseman in which Mr. Wiseman described me in the most vile of terms. After receiving these printouts I decided that it would be useless to issue any further warnings to Mr. Wiseman. I then terminated his account. Mister Wiseman was with us for less than a year and was told that he would not be allowed another account. It is our policy to refuse service to anybody who violates our terms of service, those being the use of abusive language and the posting of libelous statements. Mister Wiseman was placed on notice that he is no longer welcome and need never again apply for another account with us. Mister Wiseman has been informed that he is a "persona non gratis". Pam Hello Pam, Did you kick Roger off before or after the FCC ordered him to retest twice for causing malicious qrm to other hams? Dog |
"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message ... In article "Dog" wrote: Hello Pam, blah, blah blah.... FCC ordered him to retest twice for causing malicious qrm to other hams? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "Retest twice????"... You never do get it right, do you total **** up? ------------ July 11, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Roger L. Wiseman 610 Glen Haven Avenue Glendale, WV 26038-1302 SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license KC8JBO Dear Mr. Wiseman: Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to re- administer any examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE's). The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under the supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated by the Commission. Accordingly, we are requiring you to re-take the General Class Amateur Examination, (Elements 2, 3(A) and 3(B)) under the supervision of an American Radio Relay League Volunteer Examiner Coordinator. This examination must be completed on or before September 11, 2000. The required code speed that you must demonstrate is 5 words per minute. Please be prepared to verify your current address and to present a photo identification. Pursuant to Commission rules, your license will be cancelled if you do not appear for re-examination. You will be granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements you pass upon re- examination. Sincerely, W. Riley Hollingsworth Special Counsel, Amateur Radio Enforcement Bureau ------------------------------ Now where in the letter does it say "interference(qrm) is the reason for the retest? Oh, Holsten, is Lardass' buddy, a registered sex offender. Are you still molesting your Grandson Jason and that little mulatto mongrel newborn baby of yours? Steve Holsten 611 W 9th St, Kennett, MO 63857 (573)717-7705 (573)717-7706 That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. Dog |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote:
: : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. ==================== "Roger hasn't recieved 'repeat visits with the chief of police'. You ar a liar. He isn't about to get another one either, dumbass." -- Secwet Woger in message-id b14c37cf833370abc4122a241ccf54c4@melontraffickers .com |
Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. |
Roger is still, to this day, maintaining that he did nothing wrong. He says that the FCC can re-examine any licensees who have been through the VEC administered programs. Roger chuckle-chuckle stupidly asserts that he was "ramdomly" chosen and that nowhere in the letters does it say that he caused malicious interference to another Ham. So there you have it. 'Not Roger' is dancing a fine line between being guilty or being allegedly guilty, but he was not ordered to retest due to some random, willy-nilly pick-of-the-hat lottery that Riley Hollingsworth uses. So, is 'Not Roger' guilty? You bet your a** he is. -- Learn to spell "Anonymous" first, Nursie. You get your panties in a wad and you always screw up. "It's "complaintant," you sniveling weasel." (Roger Wiseman on spelling complainant.) "KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. Yup, those look like the real McCoy and I note in the November 9, 1999 letter that the FCC cites *evidence* of deliberate malicious repeated interference on 20 meters, which is one of the conditions under which Riley orders people to restest. Dog |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. Tnx for posting the true AND accurate copies of the FCC letters sent to Roger, which clearly proves he was retested for repeatedly causing intentional malicious qrm on 20 meters. |
Oh, well. I have been absent from this NG for 20 months and return to find
the same children still calling each other names over the same nonsense. Time to drag the cooler back into the stands and wait a while longer. It's known as "arrested development" -- some folks just never get out of the 6th grade. -- ----- "QRM Retest Roger" wrote in message ... "KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. Tnx for posting the true AND accurate copies of the FCC letters sent to Roger, which clearly proves he was retested for repeatedly causing intentional malicious qrm on 20 meters. |
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:50:19 +0200 (CEST), Not-Roger wrote:
: In article : Stagger Lee wrote: : : And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no : access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* : Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. : : Funny, it's a copy of the actual letter, which was posted on the : Rain Report website when Hal posted the letters from the FCC. But the Rain Report only received copies of the original letter, as did the ARRL and some others. Only Roger Wiseman has the original letters, as well as *all* of the original letters. He is the only one who can prove that the letters under discussion were not post-edited. That is, he is the only one who can prove that he wasn't retested at least twice. : But, since you can't even differentiate between the Marshall : County WV and the Marshall County, AL websites, your But I'm not Lloyd; I'm someone else. So your "logic" simply doesn't apply. : blatheringasSTOMP!!! Now if you *were* Roger, your claims might carry some weight. But, alas, you aren't. You said so. Until the real Roger posts, I'm going to assume that he was retested at least two or three times. ==================== In message , AB8MQ issues a West Virginia, hillbilly insult when he says: "Faggot Lee is gnetically [sic] related to his sister." |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. Hearing no further whining from Roger about *random retesting*, based on the above letters, we now know Wogie was retested because of his repeated deliberate malicious jamming of ham radio operators on 20 meters. Case closed. |
"QRM Retest Roger" wrote in message ... "KC8GXW" wrote in message ... Stagger Lee wrote: On Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:05:38 -0500, Dog wrote: : : That's a post-edited copy of the *real* letter. And besides, that's not Roger Wiseman. Therefore, that person has no access to the original FCC letters; only copies. Now if he *were* Roger Wiseman, his comments might carry some weight. But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. Hearing no further whining from Roger about *random retesting*, based on the above letters, we now know Wogie was retested because of his repeated deliberate malicious jamming of ham radio operators on 20 meters. Case closed. Spin it any way you want "Not Roger," but the *evidence* is clearly there for all to see. "....citing EVIDENCE that the licensee..." |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. |
http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0503.html GLENDALE, WV [UPDATE]: The FCC had written General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and Advanced licensee Steven A. Tunder, N8WGM, that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth cautioned Tunder and Wiseman to review §97.1 of the Amateur Radio rules and "to make certain that whatever disputes that may exist are not carried over to Amateur Radio frequencies." Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Wiseman alleged in a subsequent communication to the ARRL that Tunder had been harassing him and that he had made the FCC aware of it in the first place. Wiseman indicated that he had been in touch with Hollingsworth to clarify the situation. The FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...2000/0719.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters. http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations. |
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:25:33 +0200 (CEST), Not-Woger wrote:
: In article : Stagger Lee wrote: : Oh my. I see you're still reading Usenet via Google. The ellipsis is a dead giveaway. : But the Rain Report only received copies of the original : letter, as : did the ARRL and some others. Only Roger Wiseman has the : original : letters, as well as *all* of the original letters. He is the : only one : who can prove that the letters under discussion were not post- : edited. Also, Google's word wrap is terrible. Look how badly my own post is quoted. I guess that you've run out first rate USPs. Been kicked off too many of them, eh? : No, YOU posted a copy of the letter to the newsgroups after it : came out, tubby. It was available on the Rain Report website : before Hap decided not to keep posting them. I think you have me confused with someone else. There were many who (re)posted the copies of the letters, including Woger Wiseman. Too bad he's not around to straighten this whole thing out. : One does not get retested "twice." You must be Lennie. Too : stupid to even get a ham license. I would think that you can be retested as often as the FCC directs. In fact, I'd be willing to bet on it. Too bad Woger isn't around to let us know how many times he was retested. I personally think that anyone who believes in negative SWR might have to be tested several times. Add the jamming to that mix, and I can envision four or five retests. : Oh, you are the one who posted that the Marshall County, Alabama : website was the one for Marshall County, West Virginia. No, I just said it was Marshall County. And it was. WOGER was the one who assumed that I meant West Virginia. And how is it that you retain and bring up that post after years have elapsed? After all, you're not Woger and the comments were clearly directed at him. If I hadn't accepted your word that you aren't Woger, I'd start to suspect that you could be prevaricating. [Jbtre guvaxf gung ynfg jbeq ersref gb xvaxl frk.] What a terrible thought. [61 additional lines flushed.] ==================== In message , AB8MQ shows his technical cluelessness about IP addresses when he ominously asks: "Still using: NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.133.151?" |
"Pam" PamHoffer@nosplam wrote in message ... Hello. My name is Pam. I once ran an ISP in the West Virginia/Ohio area. Roger Wiseman was at one time a subscriber to my services, but that didn't last long. Why, you ask? Mr. Wiseman was never the best of customers and from the very first week of him signing with us the complaints rolled in. The majority of the complaints centered on the fact that Mr. Wiseman was posting libel and did so with a before unheard of amount of filthy verbiage. I, Pam, warned Mr. Wiseman on several occasions. Mr. Wiseman responded by placing the blame on others, others whose names or IP addresses he could not provide. He assured me that the violations would stop. Then, about three years ago, I received a printout from a person who called himself Arf! Arf! In the printout were numerous posts, with headers, made by Mr. Wiseman in which Mr. Wiseman described me in the most vile of terms. After receiving these printouts I decided that it would be useless to issue any further warnings to Mr. Wiseman. I then terminated his account. Mister Wiseman was with us for less than a year and was told that he would not be allowed another account. It is our policy to refuse service to anybody who violates our terms of service, those being the use of abusive language and the posting of libelous statements. Mister Wiseman was placed on notice that he is no longer welcome and need never again apply for another account with us. Mister Wiseman has been informed that he is a "persona non gratis". Pam I claim *SPANK* on Roger. The FCC letters being self-evident. Too bad, only Roger could possibly refute the spank, but then he is not here, only someone who claims he is "Not Roger." 73, Lloyd |
Anonymous wrote: In article KC8GXW wrote: But, alas, he isn't. He said so. http://www.arrl.owhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh, I was proved wrong. Hmm, you dumbasses, need to review what "citing evidence" mean. And it still doesn't change: http://www.arrl.org/news/enforcement...1999/1119.html GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has occurred at various times in the last several months and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the evidence. Better learn to read: ROGER L WISEMAN 610 GLEN HAVEN AVE GLENDALE WV 26038-1302 |
"Lloyd" wrote in message ... "allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters." Enough said. Roger loses. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
By your own admission, you are "Not Roger," so what you say has
no validity, much less is it even logical in the face of self-evident FCC correspondence. Once you resorted to profanity, you lost any hope of convincing anyone here. 73, Lloyd "Tarapia Tapioco" wrote in message x.it... Yup, it looksd like you are shown to be stupid again. Or as always. Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to re- administer any examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE's). The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under the supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated by the Commission. |
Stop your whining you little bitch. Everyone knows that Lloydie is a
TimeLORD. I guess he used his TimeLORD powers to get you kicked off of AOL. Har Har. You're still Usenet's biggest punching bag, dumbass. |
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 01:01:40 +0200 (CEST), Secwet Not-Woger whined:
: In article : Stagger Lee wrote: : : On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 17:25:33 +0200 (CEST), Not-Woger : wrote: : : In article : : Stagger Lee wrote: : : : : Oh my. I see you're still reading Usenet via Google. The : ellipsis is : a dead giveaway. : : I see you still hide behind an alias. But that yellow streak : running down your back is something you can't hide. You whine : about somebody using a remailer, yet you hide behind a fictional : black man and a fictional isp name. Hypocrite. What is it the flamers say? PKB or IKYABWAI? Either appellation would fit the incredible case of Secwet Not-Woger becoming indignant about someone who uses a pseudonym. At least I can be traced, provided that one has a legitimate reason to provide to my USP. The real Woger has made several attempts at that, all of which have failed. The last time he sent a poison pen email to my USP, I responded by outing him at his Stratuswave ISP. A few months later, Stratuswave kicked Woger off their service. : And, the last time I checked, I'm still not Roger. And it's a good thing too. The real Woger has lots of enemies who are eager to try and get him dumped from his ISPs. If you were Woger, it would be tempting to release the identities of your current ISPs to your enemies and to let them do the rest. : : Since when? You post things that have no basis in reality. And you do? : : Subject: Get on the Marshall County ARES webpage...... : Date: 3 Jul 2002 22:03:46 GMT : From: (Stagger Lee) : Organization: Houston's least reliable ISP : MsgId: [DRIVELSNIP] This is a very Woger-like thing to do: Post something which absolutely isn't to be found on groups.google.com. I just looked at the entire archived thread on google, and there is no such post there. Could it be that you have it saved on your own machine, or are you simply a post-editing liar? But I digress: The topic is supposed to be the multiple retests which were apparently ordered by the FCC. Some people claim that the FCC letters posted here have been post-edited to omit the additional tests, and the group has been attempting to get at the truth of the matter. Unfortunately, Woger is nowhere to be found and can't shed any light on the topic. Since you yourself say that you've looked in a mirror and noticed that you aren't Woger, I'm afraid that the real question remains unresolved. What a pity. ==================== In message , AB8MQ contradicts himself with "Hi, Kindly **** off. I don't give a **** whether or not you use your real name or not." |
The space below is reserved for Roger to have the last word in
this thread. Wogie becomes vewy vewy angwy if he is not allowed to have the last word. Must be the dominating female side in his personality. Begin your profanity rant here Roger: |
Dog wrote:
Hello Pam, Did you kick Roger off before or after the FCC ordered him to retest twice for causing malicious qrm to other hams? Dog Hard to imagine anyone being stupid enough to do stuff so dumb that the FCC makes them retest twice, but then that's wogie. |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:26:57 -0700 (PDT), Secwet Woger
wrote: : In article : Stagger Lee wrote: : : This is : : More of your whining, isn't it, tubby? Tell us why the Athens, : Al, police came by your HUD apartment. As I said in another post, those confusing double images from which you're suffering have misled you. Uncross your eyes. I'm not named "Lloyd," and I don't live in Alabama. ==================== In message XLSKB3LR38448.4326273148@anonymous, Secwet Woger dazzled his readers with his logic skills by saying: "The fact is you still can't disprove I've never been to your workplace." |
Fritz Wuehler
wrote: In article .com "Who's Your Daddy, BITCH?" wrote: Stop IKYABWAI Stop sockpuppeting. You are still usesnet's biggest punching bag and drunk. Woger? Is that you? I kinda recognize the spelling? LOL -- Jules mhm26x8 |
Essay graded by Microsoft Word and found to be almost at 7th grade
grammar level. Punctuation errors are common. ===(begin analysis)=== Lardass, you still have that cocksucking lisp. There are no Daleks under your command 'tard boy. They are fictional robots used in a television show! You need to get mental help again failure boy. You have been a failure in everything you have ever done, PERIOD! You are indeed "pale" you never venture forth outside except for your minimum wage "job," and to buy more of that pussy Bud Lite beer. A real man's beer would probably kill a big fat pussy like yourself. === ERROR: Reflexive pronoun use. Replace "like yourself" with "like you." === You need to seriously take a long hard look at yourself in a properly lit mirror in that roach infested hovel you call home and then take action. Lose weight, get mental help, stay off the computer for hours on end and face reality. You are 31 years of age, you deliver pizzas, you play with dolls, you get drunk and === ERROR: Comma use. "you play with dolls, and you ..." === spew your filth and delusions on here and usenet. Nobody, I repeat, nobody except for a couple of geeks like yourself can stand you. The best thing you could do is to slit your wrists while in that ****ty vehicle of yours this summer, then if the police didn't find you right away, the Alabama summer heat would do it without you having to be cremated. You are a blathering asshole that is a boil in the crack of America's ass. You irritate us, end it now Porky, do it! === ERROR: Comma use. "... irritate us, end it now Porky, do it!" First comma should be a period; second comma should be a semicolon. === You need to either kill yourself or get help, that's it, do it! === ERROR: Comma use. "... get help, that's it, do it!" First comma should be a period; second comma should be a semicolon. ===(end analysis)=== Summary: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 6.8 |
"Lloyd" wrote in message ... Essay graded by Microsoft Word and found to be almost at 7th grade grammar level. Punctuation errors are common. ===(begin analysis)=== Lardass, you still have that cocksucking lisp. There are no Daleks under your command 'tard boy. They are fictional robots used in a television show! You need to get mental help again failure boy. You have been a failure in everything you have ever done, PERIOD! You are indeed "pale" you never venture forth outside except for your minimum wage "job," and to buy more of that pussy Bud Lite beer. A real man's beer would probably kill a big fat pussy like yourself. === ERROR: Reflexive pronoun use. Replace "like yourself" with "like you." === You need to seriously take a long hard look at yourself in a properly lit mirror in that roach infested hovel you call home and then take action. Lose weight, get mental help, stay off the computer for hours on end and face reality. You are 31 years of age, you deliver pizzas, you play with dolls, you get drunk and === ERROR: Comma use. "you play with dolls, and you ..." === spew your filth and delusions on here and usenet. Nobody, I repeat, nobody except for a couple of geeks like yourself can stand you. The best thing you could do is to slit your wrists while in that ****ty vehicle of yours this summer, then if the police didn't find you right away, the Alabama summer heat would do it without you having to be cremated. You are a blathering asshole that is a boil in the crack of America's ass. You irritate us, end it now Porky, do it! === ERROR: Comma use. "... irritate us, end it now Porky, do it!" First comma should be a period; second comma should be a semicolon. === You need to either kill yourself or get help, that's it, do it! === ERROR: Comma use. "... get help, that's it, do it!" First comma should be a period; second comma should be a semicolon. ===(end analysis)=== Summary: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 6.8 ROTFLMAO! 73, Tom |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com