Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
That's just it toddieboy, your opinions are of no interest to the
amateur community.
So, are you going to be at your station 24/7 as the control
operator

as

you broadcast your non-bulletins?


Sure am and I have a few other amatuer's who said they want in on
it.

Todd N9OGL


Yea right. Get back to us sometime when you grow up and can tell the
truth.

Oh, the irony.

Gopher Face "Buzz Corey" proves he is a "loser" when he can't even
spell "loser"in
:
"Again you loose two-test"

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
NO your missing the point it is up to the station transmitting it
to
determine if it is of interest to the amateur radio community, not
the
morons listening,

Todd N9OGL


Hard to believe you can really be so stupid toddieboy.


Pot kettle Back, obsolete license boy.

Gopher Face "Buzz Corey" proves he is a "loser" when he can't even
spell "loser"in
:
"Again you loose two-test"

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
wrote:


Pot kettle Back, obsolete license boy.

What were you

What were you saying obsolete license BOY?

Gopher Face "Buzz Corey" proves he is a "loser" when he can't even
spell "loser"in
:
"Again you loose two-test"

Cmd Butt Cornholed wrote:
wrote:


Pot kettle Back, obsolete license boy.

What

Gopher Face "Buzz Corey" proves he is a "loser" when he can't even
spell "loser"in
:
"Again you loose two-test"

N9OGL wrote:
Stebie said

No one, here or on the air, wants to hear the ranting of a
functionally illiterate loudmouth who doesn't think twice about
violating the law when it suits him.

I can talk a Hell of lot better then I can right you ####ing
###hole.

I doubt it. I bet it takes you less than 60 seconds in any
conversation wherein you think you're not getting your way to resort to
the kind of language you let fly in here.

Which is probably why you're finishing up your "college" on-line
over this summer rather than by the deadline that's already passed.

Just how many "fans" do you think you'll create by mimicking
ARRL's "bulletins" on the most crowded Amateur allocation
worldwide...???

Who says I mimicking the ARRL??

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website.

You're the epitome of selfish, Todd.

DAM RIGHT! I didn't get in this hobby for you or any other dumb ####
ham operator, I got into it for my own selfishness.

And when your selfishness degrades my ability to enjoy Amateur
Radio (ie: N9OGL one-way broadcasts on 20 meters), it's no longer a
matter of your OWN "enjoyment.

97.3(a)
(4) Amateur service. "......duly authorized persons interested in
radio
technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest."

I think the key words to look at steve is "PERSONAL AIM" there is
nothing in the rules stating that I have to listen to what other
amateur say. It dumb ### groups like the ARRL which pushes this
communistic "collectivism" on the amateur radio service. Then there
is
dumb ###es like yourself who believe it.

There you go dissing the ARRL for a running race that they don't
have a horse in...

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:


I can talk a Hell of lot better then I can right you ****ing asshole.

Do you mean "write" toddieboy as I can "write"? I certainly hope you can
talk better than you can "write", because you can't "write" worth a crap.
I see, like wogie, you still use that jr. highschool vulguarity. Are you
two brothers by chance?

lardass_lloydie AKA wogie two-test lloydie wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

wrote:


Pot kettle Back, obsolete license boy.

GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L. Wiseman,
KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the supervision of
an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for retesting
by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants
appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license
consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on
March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing
personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included
allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Counsel
for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two
licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the FCC
had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to
allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

lardass_lloydie AKA wogie two-test lloydie wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

wrote:


Pot kettle Back, obsolete license boy.

What

GLENDALE, WV: The FCC sent a Warning Notice November 9, 1999, to General
licensee Roger L. Wiseman, KC8JBO, citing evidence that the licensee had
been "deliberately and maliciously interfering with the radio operations
of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This interference has
occurred at various times in the last several months and includes
broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions," said a letter
from FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley
Hollingsworth. Hollingsworth warned that continued operation of the type
described could result in a fine or license revocation proceeding, and
he requested that the licensee contact him to discuss the allegations.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

stebie said
Which is probably why you're finishing up your "college" on-line
over this summer rather than by the deadline that's already passed.

What deadline???

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website

No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.

And when your selfishness degrades my ability to enjoy Amateur
Radio (ie: N9OGL one-way broadcasts on 20 meters), it's no longer a
matter of your OWN "enjoyment.

BOOOOOO HOOOO go cry to someone who cares.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
stebie said
Which is probably why you're finishing up your "college" on-line
over this summer rather than by the deadline that's already passed.

What deadline???

Six weeks ago you said you were "graduating" in 30 days.

You do the math, Todd.

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website

No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.

Uh huh.

Thief.

And when your selfishness degrades my ability to enjoy Amateur
Radio (ie: N9OGL one-way broadcasts on 20 meters), it's no longer a
matter of your OWN "enjoyment.

BOOOOOO HOOOO go cry to someone who cares.

I'm not crying. I'm laughing...

...at you.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:

I can talk a Hell of lot better then I can right you ####ing
###hole.

What a gem! Typical Todd!

Steve, K4YZ

Stebie said
Six weeks ago you said you were "graduating" in 30 days.

no, six months ago I would be done with school for this semester, I
have about two to three more years of school left.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
Stebie said
Six weeks ago you said you were "graduating" in 30 days.

no, six months ago I would be done with school for this semester, I
have about two to three more years of school left.

Sorry, Todd..you said "graduating"...The end of the semester is not
"graduating".

Talk to Lennie about school...He managed to turn a 3 year diploma
program into a 14 year project. I am sure he can offer you some
pointers on how to be a career undergraduate student.

Steve, K4YZ

STEBIE SAID:

You had best be careful, Todd...The result STILL might not be what
you'd like...Especially after they get a load of your true intentions
and ulterior motives, Todd...

What "TRUE INTENTIONS" and "ULTERIOR MOTIVES"?? to be able to voice my
opinion about things in amateur radio....oh I forgot your communist who
bleieves we must me a collective.

Here's an honest, forthright suggestion on your "bulletin" ideas,
Todd.

Become an ARRL "Official Bulletin Station". Use YOUR repeater to
rebroadcast ARRL bulletins, the Amateur Radio Newsline program, or
other RESPECTED, professionally produced offerings for the "main
course".

Why would I do that?? I mean who the hell said that these people were
the only ones allowed to run information bulletins and be a monopoly??
so your communist who believes only ONE truth be allowed out
there....just like a typical ARRL SUPPORTER!

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL SAID
You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website
No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.

PANSY-ASS STEBIE SAID

Uh huh.
Thief.

Look's who talking you and your little butt buddies on here were
posting not only my pass messages but posting stuff from my website
without my permission in clear violation of copyright law.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
N9OGL SAID

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website

No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.


PANSY-ASS STEBIE SAID


Uh huh.

Thief.

Look's who talking you and your little butt buddies on here were
posting not only my pass messages but posting stuff from my website
without my permission in clear violation of copyright law.

Todd N9OGL


So file a law suit and get laughed out of court.

N9OGL wrote:
So file a law suit and get laughed out of court.


I don't think so, copyright law states that you have to have the
persons permission before republishing it.

Well toddieboy, you claim 'stuff' from your website was used 'without
your permission in clear violatioin of copyright law'. So either sue or
shut up.

N9OGL wrote:
Don't matter unless I say they are public domain they are copyrighted.
the writer has to say I'm putting this work in public domain (word for
word) for it to be in public domain, if he does not then it not in
public domain. I suggest you some copyright law, I've been doing that
crap a lot longer the amateur radio I have a number of works that
copyrighted. under copright law you can use fair use of the work, but
as court have stated a person making a comment can only use a small
portion of the work. like I said Stebie read some Copyright Law.

Todd N9OGL


Toddieboy, has it ever occured to you that you are operating on about a
5th grade level?

N9OGL wrote:
STEBIE SAID:

You had best be careful, Todd...The result STILL might not be what
you'd like...Especially after they get a load of your true
intentions
and ulterior motives, Todd...

What "TRUE INTENTIONS" and "ULTERIOR MOTIVES"?? to be able to voice
my
opinion about things in amateur radio....oh I forgot your communist
who
bleieves we must me a collective.

Your "those morons who are listening" comment illuminated your
true intentions, Todd...You have no interest in Amateur Radio other
than as a forum to artificially bolster your deficient testosterone
levels.

And Todd...Your grammar, spelling and construction really need some
work.

Allow me: "Oh...I forgot that you're a Communist who believes that
we must be a collective."

No, I am an American Armed Forces Veteran who knows what's at
stake. You, on the other hand, are a stay-at-home spoiled brat
parasite sponging off of your aging parents.

And that's my liberal opinion.

Here's an honest, forthright suggestion on your "bulletin" ideas,
Todd.

Become an ARRL "Official Bulletin Station". Use YOUR repeater to
rebroadcast ARRL bulletins, the Amateur Radio Newsline program, or
other RESPECTED, professionally produced offerings for the "main
course".

Why would I do that?? I mean who the hell said that these people were
the only ones allowed to run information bulletins and be a
monopoly??
so your communist who believes only ONE truth be allowed out
there....just like a typical ARRL SUPPORTER!

There you go...blaming the ARRL for something that they've not
chimed one word in on, Todd....You've still not explained to me why you
are blaming the ARRL for anything.

My O N L Y comment of "support" has been that the ARRL bulletin
station is recognized by the FCC as the defacto representitive of the
Amateur Radio Service membership...I make this statement since W1AW is
the ONLY "bulletin station" that the FCC makes direct liasion with when
it needs to pass messages to the Amateur Service, ie: communications
emergencies, etc.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website

No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.

PANSY-### STEBIE SAID

Uh huh.
Thief.

Look's who talking you and your little butt buddies on here were
posting not only my pass messages but posting stuff from my website
without my permission in clear violation of copyright law.

Your "pass messeages" (PAST messages, Todd) were made in open
public forum.

And I don't need your permission to address comments aimed at me.
Sorry. Nice try.

Steve, K4YZ

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
N9OGL SAID

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website

No,I post in the title the subject of what is a concern to the
amateur's and voice my opinion about it.


PANSY-ASS STEBIE SAID


Uh huh.

Thief.

Look's who talking you and your little butt buddies on here were
posting not only my pass messages but posting stuff from my website
without my permission in clear violation of copyright law.

Todd N9OGL


So file a law suit and get laughed out of court.

I don't think so, copyright law states that you have to have the
persons permission before republishing it. Fair-Use according to the
court says you can use a small portion of the work but not the whole
work. I suggest cornwhore to read up on copyright law. I've been doing
to copyright thing for a VERY LONG time.

Don't matter unless I say they are public domain they are copyrighted.
the writer has to say I'm putting this work in public domain (word for
word) for it to be in public domain, if he does not then it not in
public domain. I suggest you some copyright law, I've been doing that
crap a lot longer the amateur radio I have a number of works that
copyrighted. under copright law you can use fair use of the work, but
as court have stated a person making a comment can only use a small
portion of the work. like I said Stebie read some Copyright Law.

Todd N9OGL

Has it occured to you that you and stebien are both assholes???

N9OGL wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

So file a law suit and get laughed out of court.

I don't think so, copyright law states that you have to have the
persons permission before republishing it. Fair-Use according to the
court says you can use a small portion of the work but not the whole
work. I suggest cornwhore to read up on copyright law. I've been
doing
to copyright thing for a VERY LONG time.

I echo what Commander Buzz said.

I DARE you to try and file a case, Toiddie!

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
like I said Stebie read some Copyright Law.

This is a hoot....

Toiddie steals stuff from ARRL's website in order to create a
"show" on 20 meter HF, then whines like a 3 year old who just dropped
his sucker in the mud when his efforts to stiffle "free speech" are
rubbed in his nose by claimed "copyright law" violations...

What a putz.

Steve, K4YZ