Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Leo wrote: On 2 Jun 2005 19:45:52 -0700, wrote: From: Leo on Jun 2, 6:40 pm On 1 Jun 2005 15:39:42 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 31 May 2005 15:37:45 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 31 May 2005 02:06:42 -0700, wrote: etc. What part of that is not accurate, Leo? Maybe you are who you say you are, and maybe you aren't. Maybe "Arf!" is who he says he is - or maybe he ain't. Perhaps! Hmmm - let's see here....I wasn't agreeing with you, so perhaps I am not legitimate. Not at all. Your lack of verifiable ID means there's room for doubt. Same for "Arf" or any other anonymous poster. You seem to place a great deal of value on 'verifiability', Jim. Heh. Just because someone's callbook ID is verifiable doesn't mean that much else is. Take you, for example - other than what's in the QRZ database, how much do we know about you? Just what you have stated in your posts - that's all. Is what you say true ? Maybe - maybe not. Unless someone is willing to put in the effort, time and expense to research an individual's claims, they can be neither proven nor disproven. I disagree in part, as far as this newsgroup is concerned: Certain individuals in here (curiously coincidental on their attitudes favoring morse code testing!) are allowed free rein on whatever they CLAIM. Others, challenging that attitude are rained on...lately insofar as national patriotism is concerned. Fair enough. Not really. Len "rains on" anyone who disagrees with him... A very remote parallel sort-of exists in here, the PCTA bravely "fighting" to keep their royal RULE alive, yet are slowly losing. The much-touted near-Byzantine CLASS structure of U.S. amateur radio has not been decimated, it has been cut in HALF. [Roman Legions were never that severe with their "disciplinary" measures of decimation] Further, to add insult to their "injury," the beloved Title/Rank/Status of "20 WPM Tested" was reduced to a "mere" 5 WPM. [their cold, dead reasoning refuses to let their mental fingers release their code keys...tsk] Their "Empire" is falling and they curse the evil "sloth" in revenge; George Lucas couldn't make a film on this epic due to too many "Annakin" manmiquins abounding. [see "Revenge of the Sloth" who want only the "easy way to get a license...etc, etc, ad nauseum] Sad, isn't it - Jeez, it's just a hobby! Does "hobby" equate to "there must be no standards"? BTW, have you noticed that since he began posting via Google, his language has deteriorated significantly (i.e. his posts contain the word "bulls$%^" quite frequently now - which was quite a rarity in the past.. Len has made a habit of posting things about me that are simply not true. Such as his false claim that I have tried to ban all but licensed amateurs from posting here, or commenting to FCC. That claim is simply false. When asked for evidence or example of where I have done so, Len has nothing to show. Yet he keeps making that claim, and others. Leo, what word would be more appropriate than "bull****" to describe that claim? What words would be more appropriate than "jackass behavior" to describe the actions of the person making such claims? Leo, if you happen to chance upon an AOL screen name of "Juan Mortime" in the future, that will be me. [pronounce it to get the pun - mightier than the sword] No doubt that is, somewhere, already OUTRAGING and INSULTING (!) Spanish speakers for "unpatriotically defacing Latin customs" everywhere. Sigh. I have more names plus another Internet provider. Everywhere one goes we find the anal-retentive with figurative USB connectors jammed up their I/O ports. Heh....No problem, Juan - won't bother me a bit! Juwanna Bet You guys are pikers. Look at just some of the folks who have gone befo From PHC: Sandy Beech Paige Turner Sarah Bellum From Car Talk: Heywood Jabuzzoff Peekip Andropov (chauffer service) Marge Inovera (research dept) Erasmus b. Dragon (really overworked staffer) Even from QST: Noah Q. Essels (claims he has DXCC but no verification) Lotta Chazzeez (homebrewer of many small projects) Harry Uppensine (makes very long CQs) And many more. Lots more of course, those are just the ones I recall offhand. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shortwave random-wire antenna question | Shortwave |